System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Force limits and layout design.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Adhesive ability of the biorobotic remora disc prototypes.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Tfr cells’ transcriptomic profile distinguishes them from Treg and Tfh cells. Tfr cells’ transcriptomic profile distinguishes them from Treg and Tfh cells.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Force limits and layout design.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Fig. 1 Experimental apparatus used to train and test free-flying bees on their capacity to learn addition and subtraction. Experimental apparatus used.

Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.

Experimental setup. Experimental setup. (A) Chair with a human-like robotic arm on its side. (B) Ball-balancing board containing color-shape markers. (C)

Fig. 6 External drivers and model response.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Experimental setup for HIL Bayesian optimization.

The prototype and working mechanism.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

Technological framework of the multidirectional gravity-assist

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

by Ye Ding, Myunghee Kim, Scott Kuindersma, and Conor J. Walsh

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

Fig. 4 CO2 emission changes triggered by the JJJ clean air policy.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Force and angular speed profiles in the normal collision (contact angle, 90°) at 1.2 m/s for the naked and origami-protected configurations on the rough.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Fig. 1. Overview of a soft wearable robot (exosuit) designed to augment paretic limb function during hemiparetic walking. Overview of a soft wearable robot.

Robot-assisted intervention system.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. (A) TPAD system setup. (B) EMG data, (C) lower limb angles for hip, knee, and ankle, (D) pelvic translational ROM and trunk angle, and (E) vertical GRFs during session 1 including free walking before training, during training with force, and free walking after training. Data during training (black line) were recorded at the seventh minute of training, and data after training (blue line) were recorded at the third minute after training. Yellow shaded area presents the stance phase of the gait cycle. Trunk ankle is defined by two markers attached to the seventh cervical vertebra and sacrum, averaged over the gait cycle. J. Kang et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan2634 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works