Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Identification of Structural Mechanisms of HIV-1 Protease Specificity Using Computational Peptide Docking: Implications for Drug Resistance  Sidhartha.
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Parsimony in Protein Conformational Change
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Yizhou Liu, Richard A. Kahn, James H. Prestegard  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
A Functional Proline Switch in Cytochrome P450cam
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Omar Davulcu, Peter F. Flynn, Michael S. Chapman, Jack J. Skalicky 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The Dynamic Basis for Signal Propagation in Human Pin1-WW
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e7 (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures of the pol β apoenzyme (3UXN-A (5)), binary complex (3ISB (30)) with ... Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures.
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Mixed-Linkage Ubiquitin Chains Send Mixed Messages
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1155-1166 (July 2016) Dissecting Dynamic Allosteric Pathways Using Chemically Related Small-Molecule Activators  George P. Lisi, Gregory A. Manley, Heidi Hendrickson, Ivan Rivalta, Victor S. Batista, J. Patrick Loria  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1155-1166 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 IGPS Reaction The T. maritima IGPS complex contains two enzyme subunits: HisH (blue), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of glutamine (the Gln analog acivicin is shown in orange sticks) near a conserved catalytic triad (green spheres), and HisF (gray), which catalyzes the cleavage and cyclization of the allosteric activator and substrate PRFAR (purple sticks). The inverted arrow depicts the path of NH3 travel, and key secondary structural elements of IGPS are labeled. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ligand Binding to IGPS by ITC Changes in free energy (black), enthalpy (red), and entropy (blue) are shown for the formation of ternary complexes through binding of AICAR, IGP, or PRFAR to acivicin-conjugated IGPS. The catalytic rate enhancements caused by each allosteric ligand are shown under the ligand label. See also Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ligand-Induced Chemical Shift Perturbations (A–H) Shown are changes in (A) AICAR, (B) IGP, (E) AICAR and IGP, and (F) PRFAR effector-bound ternary complexes relative to apo IGPS. Black lines represent 1.5σ from the 10% trimmed mean of the four combined datasets. Significant changes (above the black line) are mapped onto the HisF structure (C, D, G, and H) (PDB: 1GPW) (Douangamath et al., 2002). See also Figures S3–S5. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ligand-Induced Exchange Broadening of hG50 and hG52 Located in the HisH PGVG Loop (A) The ligand titration ranges from red (apo) to purple (effector-saturated), and the percentage decrease in peak intensity is shown. (B) One-dimensional slices of the hG50 resonance showing the decrease in peak intensity from PRFAR binding. Relative peaks heights of the ligand-bound resonances (red and blue asterisks) are shown by arrows in the bottom panel. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Ligand-Induced Exchange Broadening in HisF (A–E) Representative 1H,15N HSQC spectrum of apo IGPS (orange) and PRFAR-bound IGPS (purple) (A). Residues that are significantly broadened in the presence of allosteric effectors are mapped onto the IGPS structure for AICAR (B), IGP (C), AICAR and IGP (D), and PRFAR (E) complexes. See also Figure S3. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ligand-Induced Millisecond Motions in IGPS (A and B) Representative CPMG curves for (A) effector-bound binary and (B) ternary complexes of IGPS for apo (black), AICAR (red), IGP (blue), AICAR and IGP (green), and PRFAR (purple) IGPS. Error bars were determined from duplicate experiments. See also Table S1 and Figure S8. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural Clustering of kex from NMR Relaxation Dispersion (A) The magnitudes of kex are mapped onto the structure of the IGP (left and middle) and PRFAR (right) ternary complexes for all residues undergoing millisecond exchange. Other IGPS complexes are in Figure S7. (B) Distribution of kex values for the apoenzyme (left), IGP ternary complex (middle), and PRFAR ternary complex (right). Colors in each histogram correlate with (A). Optimal bin sizing for these data were determined using the protocol outlined in Scott (1979). IGP and PRFAR are represented by blue and purple sticks, respectively. See also Tables S2–S7 and Figure S6. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Flexible Residues and Catalytic Rate Enhancement in IGPS (A) Correlation of kcat/KM versus the number of ILV residues that experience millisecond motions as determined from CPMG relaxation dispersion measurements for AICAR, IGP, AICAR and IGP, and PRFAR ternary complexes. (B–J) Flexible residues that show ligand-induced ILV dispersion curves or amide exchange broadened (beyond detection) in each of the ternary complexes. (C, E, G, and I) Rotated views of (B), (D), (F), and (H), respectively. Residues are shown as a surface rendering with each active site labeled. The allosteric ligands are shown as wire mesh. The HisH subunit is shown in cyan. See also Figures S7 and S8. Structure 2016 24, 1155-1166DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions