Lucija peterlin mašič, fakulteta za farmacijo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Advertisements

1 17/3/2009 European Commission Directorate General Information Society & Media Funding Instrument Briefing for Remote Reading.
European R&D Support Programme ACCESSING EUROPEAN FUNDING FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Large-scale integrating projects (IPs)
Structure of the Application Evaluation Criteria Oskar Otsus January 2013 Moldova.
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
1 Conference, How does research integration work? 17 June 2008 The issue of ‘research integration’ and the role of IPs and NoE in the social sciences and.
Horizon 2020 Energy Efficiency Information Day 12 December 2014 Essentials on how to submit a good proposal EASME Project Advisors: Francesca Harris,
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
FP6 PROPOSAL WRITING. What makes a good proposal - A strong proposal idea - Avoiding common weaknesses and pitfalls What to know about evaluation - Process.
Capitalising the full potential of online-collaboration for SME innovation support Horizon 2020 call Innosup (Participant Portal code: H2020-INNOSUP )
EAS 299 Writing research papers
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Training & research for academic newcomers A project of the King Baudouin Foundation.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
Dr. Margaretha Mazura (EMF) ICT Day Opportunities to participate in EU ICT research projects San José, 16 February 2010 Principles of EU Research Funding.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
Assessment of project proposals within EU grant schemes 17 & 18 December 2013 Government Office for Cooperation with NGOs Zagreb VLADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Short introduction to IDEAS Programme Maria Koutrokoi Hellenic NCP of ICT, IDEAS and Research Infrastructures Programmes Department for Strategy, Planning.
Case study of a successful proposal Rob Davies. Parts of a proposal Part A - Proposal Administrative Overview - forms Part B- Description of objectives.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
Guidelines for drafting a research project (theory and laboratory) Carlo Polidori Aurélie Pancera.
Writing the Proposal: Scientific and technological objectives PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Research DG European Commission Expressions of interest / Dedicated call mechanism.
VR’s four base criteria for review 1. Novelty and originality 2. Scientific quality of the proposed research 3. Merits of applicant(s) 4. Feasibility For.
Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.
Network of Excellence in Internet Science Network of Excellence in Internet Science (EINS) 1 st REVIEW Brussels, 12th April 2013 FP7-ICT
MSCA – European Joint Doctorate – Gijs Du Laing – Information session MSCA ITN grants MSCA – European Joint Doctorate (EJD) Gijs Du Laing Laboratory of.
Angelica Valente, PhD Department of Human Physiology Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
STRUCTURE SCIENTIFIC REPORT / MANAGEMENT REPORT −Progress / objectives (WP and project level) −Progress / milestones (WP and project level) −Progress /
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
Practical Aspects of Preparation FP 6 projects Senter/EG-Liaison Nationaal Contact Punt voor het 6de Kaderprogramma Sandra de Wild 11 december 2002.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Date: in 12 pts Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Award criteria Education and Culture Policy Officers DG EAC.C3 People NCPs Training on H2020, Brussels,
RISE Proposal. Acronym: JEPIF: Japan-Europe Physics at Intensity Frontier ??? Merge WP 1 & 3 ? – Sell as cross-fertilization and networking of flavour.
Training Event, Sofia – Feb 22 nd, 23 rd 2007 Recommendations for building successful proposals in FP7* Dipl.-Ing. Pierre.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
ARTEMIS Industry Association Title Presentation - 1 e.g. SCALOPES e.g. SCAlable LOw Power Embedded PlatformS.
The Assessment Process 11/07/2016. Types of calls and proposals Calls are challenge-based, and therefore more open to innovative proposals − Calls are.
Internal Funds: Some practical suggestions from OR-member(s) Matthias E. Storme Facultaire onderzoeksdag 19 mei 2015.
B1.1 Scientific and technological quality, incl. interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary aspects ……
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) FET-Open
Information Session May 2016
Innovative Training Networks
Eligibility and evaluation
European Research Council (ERC)
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
Marie Curie Research Training Networks Mid-Term Review Meeting
Template Guidelines Please use this template to create your LDRD presentation- we highly recommend that you address all aspects of the proposal as outlined.
How to approach a top-down call topic in Horizon 2020?
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Astrid Kaemena European Commission
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Innovation in H2020 Net Futures
Trainings and Individual Research Support at UL Tjaša Nabergoj Senior Adviser, Research Office February 2019.
The Evaluation Phase Juras Ulbikas.
Presentation transcript:

Lucija peterlin mašič, fakulteta za farmacijo CELSA Discovery of new leads modulating voltage gated potassium ion channels as emerging cancer targets Lucija peterlin mašič, fakulteta za farmacijo lucija.peterlin@ffa.uni-lj.si

Priprava projektne prijave: 5 poglavij The project proposal has to contain the following parts: Cover page (max. 1p): predloga Attachment 1: the project description (max. 4p) Attachment 2: Resources (max. 1p) Attachment 3: Added value of the collaboration (max. 1p) Attachment 4: Potential towards a future EU funding application (max. 1p) Attachment 5: CV of the involved researchers (max. 1p per participating researcher)

Ocenjevanje prijav: Selection criteria Scientific quality (60% of the scoring): To what extent does the proposed research address important challenges? To what extent are the objectives ambitious and beyond the state of the art (e.g. novel concepts and approaches or development between or across disciplines)? To what extent is the outlined scientific approach feasible? To what extent is the proposed research methodology appropriate to achieve the goals of the project? To what extent are the proposed timescales and resources necessary and properly justified?

Ocenjevanje prijav: Selection criteria Added value of the collaboration (20% of the scoring): To what extent is the proposed partnership relevant to the proposed project objectives? To what extent do the involved researchers have complementary expertise? To what extent has the proposed partnership the potential to become sustainable?

Ocenjevanje prijav: Selection criteria Potential towards future acquisition of European competitive funding (20% of the scoring): Does the proposed activity greatly help move the research collaboration towards the initial steps of a process leading to a future European collaborative research project?    Does the proposal indicate a suitable and credible process that is designed to result in a concrete application for a European competitive program? Where relevant for the indicated European competitive funding program call, are aspects like innovation and socio-economic impact sufficiently addressed?

Strukturirana projekta prijava Attachment 1: the project description (max. 4p): problem statement & objectives, envisaged progress beyond the state of the art, methodology, anticipated results, managerial aspects and timing. Strukturiran projekt: Problem statement & objectives (predstavitev problematike in cilji, slika: Scientific overview and workflow) Methodology (WPs and Tasks, kdo je odgovoren za posamezne naloge) Envisaged progress beyond the state of the art (originalnost, izvirnost) Anticipated results  (pričakovani rezultati, zakaj bodo uporabni in zakaj) Managerial aspects and timing IDEJA IZVEDLJIVOST PROJEKTA; ČASOVNICA; IP;

PROJEKTNA IDEJA ORIGINALNOST KONCEPTA; INOVATIVNOST IDEJE; POTENCIAL IDEJE.

Strukturirana projekta prijava Attachment 3: Added value of the collaboration Description of the consortium of researchers from the CELSA partners Added value of the collaboration to the envisaged research activities Attachment 4: Potential towards a future EU funding application PREDHODNE SKUPNE OBJAVE. KOMPLEMENTARNOST PARTNERJEV, DEFINIRATI SKUPNE EU PRIJAVE; DEFINIRATI PARTNERJE ZA SKUPNE EU PROJEKTE;

Innovative Training Networks (ITN) Call: H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 Training Network on Discovery of New Leads for Emerging Cancer Targets