CARACAL 12 13-14 March 2013 valentina.bertato@ec.europa.eu COM Project – “The potential impact on industrial competitiveness of restrictions on certain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selected Health, Safety & Environment Issues F. VAN HOUTE (CPIV/EDG) ICF Technical Exchange Conference Waterford/Ireland October 2002.
Advertisements

Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Reviewing the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 Crop Protection European Regulatory Conference
Identifying and addressing chemicals of concern under REACH and CLP.
REACH: Protecting Your Supply Chain Georjean L. Adams EHS Strategies, Inc. November 17,
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
Pre-registration, data-sharing and SIEFs Geert Dancet REACH Workshop – Brussels 18/09/2008.
1 UNECE – UNESCAP By Michalis P. Adamantiadis UNECE Regional Adviser on Transport Criteria for prioritization of projects.
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
EU Nickel Risk Assessment under EU Regulation 793/93 Human Health Classification a review by Dr. Tony Hart – Nickel Institute Consultant Given to the Nickel.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
European Union’s regulatory activities on PFCs Peter Korytár European Commission – DG Environment 27 October 2010.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
Can REACH become the New Global Model? Helsinki Chemicals Forum 20 May 2010 Jukka Malm, Director ECHA – Directorate of Assessment.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.
Harmonisation of Information for Poison Centres COM review Art. 45(4) CLP Regulation CARACAL November 2013, Brussels Roberto Scazzola DG Enterprise.
Outcome of the Workshop on PFOA organised by the Commission 4 th of May 2010 Christine Wistuba, DG ENV, D3.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
Identifying and addressing chemicals of concern under REACH and CLP
GADSL developments. CLEPA Materials Regulations Event 2017
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Representation of the European battery and recycling industry
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Prof. Maria Loizidou Nicosia, Hilton Park Hotel, 15th June, 2006
Summary Outcome of Regional Awareness Raising Workshops, Responses to Questionnaires and Regional Resolutions on Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs)
REACH – Textiles and leather articles
REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006
European Commission DG Environment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Study on the Impact of Authorisation NeRSAP 7 Bilbao, Spain February 2018 Pavel Prokes European Commission DG for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship.
Fitness check on chemicals legislation (excluding REACH)
Industry view on self-classification issues
REACH 2018 Registration How to prepare and mitigate Supply Chain Disruption REGISTRATION under REACH provides data on a chemical substance relating to.
MID-TERM REPORT ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
Substitution of substances of high concern
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
State of play in the EU for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Wooden Floor Coverings
Development of guidance Meeting of the IED Article 13 Forum subgroup
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Review of REACH – follow-up
WG E on Priority Substances
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
Green Infrastructure: Working method
Defense exemption in REACH CARACAL 12, Brussels, March 2013
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Changed 3rd to next Dean Leverett Graham Merrington
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment of Hazard Classes in the CLH Process
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Water Director's Meeting December 2013, Vilnius DG Environment
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

CARACAL 12 13-14 March 2013 valentina.bertato@ec.europa.eu COM Project – “The potential impact on industrial competitiveness of restrictions on certain CMR 1A and 1B substances in articles” CARACAL 12 13-14 March 2013 valentina.bertato@ec.europa.eu

Background for the project REACH foresees a specific restriction procedure under art. 68(2): COM proposal No involvement of RAC and SEAC It may apply to CMR cat. 1A and 1B in articles that could be used by consumers This procedure is proposed by COM for the first time to restrict 8 PAHs that can be found in consumers' articles COM and MS believe that there is a need for criteria on how to apply art. 68(2) Before formulating the criteria: building experience on a concrete group of substances

Status and timeline of the project A contract with ICF International was signed in December 2012 The kick-off meeting took place in January 2013 The Commission, in collaboration with ECHA, prepared a list of 44 CMRs 1A-1B potentially present in articles From this list, a shorter list of substances will be defined for a more detailed analysis The final report is due by November 2013

The "starting" list of CMR 1A-1B substances On the basis of the outcome of ECHA project, and of further considerations, 44 substances were selected. The substances have been divided into 3 groups: 1st group: substances on which to focus; these are substances more likely to be found in consumers articles 2nd group: substances on which the presence in articles needs to be confirmed in the first part of the study 3rd group: substances already in Annex XIV

Groups of substances in the study Substances more likely to be in consumers' articles Some substances in candidate list and considered/proposed for prioritisation by ECHA Phthalates, mostly not registered (concern: presence in imported articles) Some "newly classified" CMRs or substances under discussion for future classification Monomers that could be present in final articles Substances for which presence in consumers' articles needs to be checked Substances already in Annex XIV: to investigate presence in imported articles

Data to be collected on the "starting" list Articles in which the substance might be present Market information for the articles (volume, value of the market, EU production, import/export) Market players Identification and initial assessment of alternatives Potential for consumers' exposure (to help selection of substances for the 2nd part of the project) On the second group of substances, data should be collected only if there is evidence of presence in articles

The questionnaire for data collection ICF sent a questionnaire to stakeholders to collect the data needed for the first part of the study Deadline is end of March More detailed information will be collected via ad-hoc consultation of some stakeholders Please transmit the questionnaire to organisations/individual companies that might provide useful information

Second part of the project On the basis of the information collected in the first part of the project, the Commission, with the collaboration of ECHA, will select some substances: Presence in articles and economic importance of the substance Possible exposure to consumers Socio-economic aspects will be investigated: Impact of a possible restriction on main actors: manufacturers (substances and articles), formulators, users, consumers Impact in the EU and/or in relation to third countries Cost/benefit analysis Social impacts (loss/gain of jobs)

Expected outcome of the project The main objective of the project is to gather experience on practical examples and suggest criteria for identifying substances for a restriction procedure following art. 68(2) Which information could indicate if a substance is or isn't a good candidate for this procedure? Information on exposure and socio-economic impact? The criteria proposed by the consultant will be used by COM as a thought starter

CARACAL involvement Presentation of the results of the project in November CARACAL Consultation of CARACAL when elaborating on the criteria? Any comment/suggestion?