Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
10/17/2007GZHANG GCSNC C:\Presentation\2008\GEA_ Tough Accountability Situation Great GCS Achievement P resentation for Guilford Education.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Instructions for Use This presentation slideshow is intended for school and district leaders to use to explain Adequate Yearly Progress to faculty, school.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
The Context of Education in North Carolina. Today We’ll Look At… Just the numbers (i.e., schools, students, employees) The changing face of our students.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Bailey Elementary Title I Parent Information Meeting Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Michigan School Report Card Update
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008 Testing and Accountability www.ncforum.org

It Is Not an Exaggeration to Look at North Carolina Education Having Two Major Phases . . . Pre-Testing & Accountability (i.e., before 1989) And Post-Testing & Accountability (1989 to today)

The Post-Testing Era . . . Schools Are Held Accountable for Performance of All Students. The Pressure is On to Succeed With Students Who Have Historically Not Succeeded in Schools. The federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation has raised the accountability bar even higher.

Troubling Trends In Recent Scores NC Student Performance Across All Subjects Is Flat or Dropping Problems with Falling Scores After Introduction of New EOG/EOC Tests and Scoring Benchmarks

Math tests and standards become more challenging Start of ABCs model Data from DPI’s reporting tools for disaggregated student performance (http://disag.ncpublicschools.org/2007); search based on composite math/reading schools for grades 3-8

Let’s Take a Quick Look at NC’s Testing Program: The State ABC Program 1) Is a “growth” model 2) Provides financial incentives & consequences

Major Provisions of the “No Child Left Behind” Legislation NCLB Will Hold Schools Accountable for: Average performance of ALL students and 9 subgroups White Students Black Student Native American Students Asian/Pacific Islander Students Hispanic Students Multiracial Students Student with Disabilities Limited English Proficiency Students Economically Disadvantaged Students (free and reduced-priced lunch) 95% of students in a subgroup must be tested Attendance (elementary & middle) or graduation rates (high school)

Taken from DPI’s schedule for achieving AYP benchmarks under NCLB; this information schedule will remain constant through 2014 or until the reauthorization/amendment of the NCLB Act

ABCs v. NCLB YES NO* NO Components ABCs (1996) NCLB (2002) Growth model YES NO* Financial Incentives for Student Performance NO Consequences for Student Performance *NC is one of US Dept. of Education pilots for growth models.

Sharon Elementary School School DID Make AYP Met 9 of 9 targets (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools) All White 95% Reading  95% Math Reading Math Attendance Data from NC School Report Card, http://www.ncschoolreportcard.org/src/

Crown Point El. (Charlotte-Mecklenburg) Crown Point Elementary School School DID NOT Make AYP & Must Offer School Choice School met 26 (96.3%) of 27 goals Crown Point El. (Charlotte-Mecklenburg) All Black Hispanic White ED LEP SWD 95% Reading  95% Math Reading n/a Math NO Attendance Data from NC School Report Card, http://www.ncschoolreportcard.org/src/

Lexington Middle School DID NOT Make AYP & Must Offer School Choice 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 27/31=87.1% 31/33=93.9% 29/29=100% Students w/ Disabilities Reading Limited English Proficient Math Hispanic Asian Data from NC School Report Card, http://www.ncschoolreportcard.org/src/

Data from DPI’s reporting tools for disaggregated student performance (http://disag.ncpublicschools.org/2007); search based on composite reading schools for grades 3-8

Data from DPI’s reporting tools for disaggregated student performance (http://disag.ncpublicschools.org/2007); search based on composite math schools for grades 3-8

NC’s Gains on SAT Scores Lead the Nation NC data from DPI’s 2007 SAT report, http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/sat/2007; US data from College Board

While NC’s ABCs Accountability Program Is Ranked Among the Nation’s Best, Critics Are Quick to Point Out That . . . Schools Seem Overly Focused on Preparing for “the Tests” Subjects Not Tested (art, music, foreign languages, science, etc.) At the Elementary or Middle School Level Are Under-emphasized Planned High School Exit Exams Could Drive Drop Out Rates Up

“Framework for Change” Adopted by State Board in June Ends statewide writing tests Requires review of curricula and tests in alignment with 21st Century educational goals Broadens high schools’ assessment measures to include graduation rates, Graduation Projects, etc. Moves to a 5-year graduation rate for measuring AYP

John Dornan jdornan@ncforum.org 919-781-6833 www.ncforum.org