Current Progress in Therapeutic Gene Editing for Monogenic Diseases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Jin-Soo Kim Dept. of Chemistry, Seoul National Univ. Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science Genome Editing: Challenges and Opportunities.
Advertisements

Genome Editing by Matthew Porteus Department of Pediatrics,
METHODS OF GENOME ENGINEERING: A NEW ERA OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Pluripotent stem cell based gene therapy for hematological diseases
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Yasuhiro Kazuki, Mitsuo Oshimura  Molecular Therapy 
Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
Mouse Models in Preclinical Studies for Pachyonychia Congenita
Functional neutrophils from human ES cells
Figure 2 Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing
Purloined Mechanisms of Bacterial Immunity Can Cure Muscular Dystrophy
162. Stability of Polymer/Plasmid DNA Complexes In Vitro and In Vivo
281. Rapid Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) from the Urine of a Patient with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy    Molecular Therapy  Volume.
Figure 3 Endogenous repair of double-strand DNA breaks
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
Gaelen T. Hess, Josh Tycko, David Yao, Michael C. Bassik 
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer: Biology and Clinical Implications
Donald B. Kohn, MD, Caroline Y. Kuo, MD 
Research Techniques Made Simple: The Application of CRISPR-Cas9 and Genome Editing in Investigative Dermatology  Joan Ramon Guitart, Jodi L. Johnson,
Florian T. Merkle, Kevin Eggan  Cell Stem Cell 
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
HIV Receives a “One Two Knockout Punch”
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
CRISPR-Cas9 for in vivo Gene Therapy: Promise and Hurdles
Therapeutic editing of hepatocyte genome in vivo
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
CRISPR genome-editing: A medical revolution
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Correction of Patient Fibroblasts
CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
S. Tamir Rashid, Graeme J.M. Alexander  Journal of Hepatology 
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Somatic Hypermutation of Immunoglobulin Genes
Gang Wang, Na Zhao, Ben Berkhout, Atze T Das  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
William T. Hendriks, Curtis R. Warren, Chad A. Cowan  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Moonjung Jung, Cynthia E Dunbar, Thomas Winkler  Molecular Therapy 
Ignazio Maggio, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves  Trends in Biotechnology 
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
318. Targeted Genome Editing of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using CRISPR/CAS9 to Generate a Knock-in Type II Collagen Reporter for the Purification.
Mouse Models in Preclinical Studies for Pachyonychia Congenita
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy 
740. Prevention of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury by Administration of Gene-Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cells    Molecular Therapy  Volume 20, Pages S285-S286.
Molecular Therapy  Volume 21, Pages S247-S248 (May 2013)
Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence replacement. Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Natalay Kouprina, Vladimir Larionov 
Polq-Mediated End Joining Is Essential for Surviving DNA Double-Strand Breaks during Early Zebrafish Development  Summer B. Thyme, Alexander F. Schier 
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Shigeki Yagyu, Malcolm K. Brenner
CRISPR/Cas9: Transcending the Reality of Genome Editing
Nuclease Target Site Selection for Maximizing On-target Activity and Minimizing Off- target Effects in Genome Editing  Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick,
Thomas Gaj, Benjamin E Epstein, David V Schaffer  Molecular Therapy 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
New Tools for Genome Modification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
CRISPR Craze to Transform Cardiac Biology
Engineering Globin Gene Expression
Presentation transcript:

Current Progress in Therapeutic Gene Editing for Monogenic Diseases Versha Prakash, Marc Moore, Rafael J Yáñez-Muñoz  Molecular Therapy  Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 465-474 (March 2016) DOI: 10.1038/mt.2016.5 Copyright © 2016 American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of therapeutic gene editing. (a) DNA repair pathways for the resolution of a double stranded break (DSB). A nuclease is targeted toward a defined genomic locus, introducing a DSB. This may undergo one of two major repair pathways known as nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR), depending on cell cycle stage and availability of a DNA donor template. NHEJ is an error-prone mechanism, which causes small insertions or deletions (Indels) upon ligating the ends of the DNA break. HDR is a precise mechanism which repairs the break by using a homologous donor template. (b) Functional gene-editing strategies using DNA repair pathways. 1) NHEJ can be used to disrupt genomic sequences as a consequence of Indels. This can cause frameshift mutations leading to an early stop codon (or restoration of the reading frame by splice site disruption). 2) NHEJ can mediate targeted deletions. This requires generation of DSBs on both sides of the target genomic sequence, which then deletes the intervening sequence while NHEJ re-joins the DNA ends. 3) HDR can be used to correct a specific mutation by introducing a nuclease-mediated DSB (in proximity to the target site) in the presence of a homologous donor DNA containing corrective sequence. Upon recombination, the repair template corrects the mutated locus. 4) Likewise, by supplying exogenous DNA on the donor template flanked between regions of homology, HDR can be used to mediate targeted gene insertion or knock-in. (c) Schematic diagram comparing ex vivo and in vivo approaches. In vivo approaches involve direct transfer (denoted by the syringe) of genome-editing reagents such as programmable nucleases and donor templates to the human body. In this instance, two prominent gene transfer agents, viral vectors, and liposomes are shown. Ex vivo is centered on correction of the genetic defect outside of the body. This is a staged-approach whereby: 1) Patient cells are obtained. 2) Gene editing is performed in vitro. This involves delivery of nucleases on their own or concomitantly with repair template. The patient cells can be programmed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) before or after gene editing. Once corrected, iPSCs may be differentiated into cell types of interest. 3) The genetically corrected cells are characterized and expanded. 4) The corrected cells are then re-grafted back into the patient through autologous transplantation. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 465-474DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.5) Copyright © 2016 American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions