Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
pH Dependence of Sphingosine Aggregation
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Rainer A. Böckmann, Amedeo Caflisch  Biophysical Journal 
Structure and Dynamics of Calmodulin in Solution
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene fromNicotiana alata  Martin.
Linas Urnavicius, Scott A. McPhee, David M.J. Lilley, David G. Norman 
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Tae-Joon Park, Ji-Sun Kim, Hee-Chul Ahn, Yongae Kim 
Sanguk Kim, Aaron K. Chamberlain, James U. Bowie  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Richard C. Page, Sanguk Kim, Timothy A. Cross  Structure 
Calculating the Free Energy of Association of Transmembrane Helices
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Structure and Topology of the Huntingtin 1–17 Membrane Anchor by a Combined Solution and Solid-State NMR Approach  Matthias Michalek, Evgeniy S. Salnikov,
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Hydrogen Bonding in Helical Polypeptides from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Amide Hydrogen Exchange Analysis: Alamethicin and Melittin in Methanol 
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
NMR Structures of the Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Glycine Receptor α1 Subunit: Model of Pore Architecture and Channel Gating  Pei Tang, Pravat.
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages R95-R106 (October 1996)
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Computed Pore Potentials of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 762-771 (February 2002) Spatial Structure of Zervamicin IIB Bound to DPC Micelles: Implications for Voltage- Gating  Z.O. Shenkarev, T.A. Balashova, R.G. Efremov, Z.A. Yakimenko, T.V. Ovchinnikova, J. Raap, A.S. Arseniev  Biophysical Journal  Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 762-771 (February 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6 Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of the NMR data collected for 1.8mM Zrv-IIB in 72mM DPC at pH 6.8 and 30°C. The amino acid sequence is given in the one letter code, where acetyl, Aib (α-aminoisobutyric acid), Iva (d-isovaline), Hyp (4-hydroxyproline), Phl (α-aminophenylalaninol) are abbreviated as Ac, U, J, O, and Foh, respectively, and the other residues as usual. The NOE connectivities are denoted as usual: dAB (i, j) is the connectivity between the proton types A and B located in amino acid residues i and j, respectively. N, α, and β denote amide (CδH2 for O10, O13, and P15 residues), Hα (Cα-CH3 for J4, U7, U9, U12, and U14 residues), and Hβ protons, respectively. Lines, half- and full-size squares denote low, medium, and high intensity of corresponding crosspeaks in the NOESY 100ms spectrum, respectively. The circle indicates overlapping crosspeaks. The number of distance constraints, used in the structure calculation, is shown at the top of the figure. White, light-gray, and black rectangles correspond to intraresidue, sequential, and medium-range (1<i-j≤4) constraints, respectively. Values of 3JNα coupling constants, temperature coefficients of chemical shifts of amide proton signals (Δδ/ΔT), and half-exchange times of amide protons with solvent deuterons (t1/2HD, pH 4.8, 30°C) are shown in corresponding lines. Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Scatter plot of the φ, ψ, χ1 angles for 20 of the best DYANA structures (after energy minimization) of Zrv-IIB in DPC micelles. The ranges of the corresponding angles for the Zrv-IIB in methanol solution (Balashova et al., 2000) are indicated by the bounding rectangles. Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Stereoview of 20 of the best DYANA structures (after energy minimization) of Zrv IIB, superimpozed over the backbone atoms of residues 1–16. Only heavy atoms are shown. Hydrogen bonds are shown with gray dotted lines. Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Hydrophobic properties of the pore-forming helix of Zrv-IIB. (Top), 2-D isopotential map of the MHP on the peptide surface. The value on the x axis is the rotation angle about the helix axis; the parameter on y axis is the distance along the helix axis. MHP is given in relative numbers. Only the hydrophobic areas with MHP >0.09 are shown. Contour intervals are 0.015. The positions of residues are indicated by letters. (Bottom), 1-D MHP plot: angular distribution of MHP created by the peptide atoms on its surface, calculated as described in Efremov and Vergoten (1995). Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Attenuation (%) of intensity of selected crosspeaks (HN/Cα-CH3 (corresponding β protons) for J4, U7, U9, U12, and U14; CδH1/CδH2 for O10, O13, and P15; NH/CαH for other residues) in the NOESY τm=100ms spectra of the Zrv-IIB/DPC complex by the 16-doxylstearate (detergent/stearate ratio 63:1, 30°C, pH 6.8). (Insert), Model of the Zrv-IIB/DPC complex; the arc belongs to a circle drawn from the virtual micelle center and has the radius of ∼26Å. Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model for Zrv-IIB pore formation. In the absence of a TM potential, monomeric Zrv-IIB molecules are bound in the membrane/water interface. After application of a cis-positive potential the N-termini of peptides insert into bilayer, the TM molecules aggregate and form pores according to the BS model. Biophysical Journal 2002 82, 762-771DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75438-6) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions