Think, Pair, Share A: What is your intuition? B: Is intuition something we should rely on? A: Give an example to illustrate how we might use intuition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS Religious Ethics Revision
Advertisements

‘Good is a meaningless word. It attempts to define something non- existent.’ How might (a) Intuitionists and (b) Emotivists react to this statement?
Natural Law AS Revision
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
Meta-Ethics Non-Cognitivism.
Ethical non-naturalism
Intuitionism Just ‘know’ that something is ‘good’
Meta-Ethics and Ethical Language
Cognitivist and Non-Cognitivist LO: I will understand GE Moore’s idea of naturalistic fallacy. Ethical judgments, such as "We should all donate to charity,"
INTUITIONISM: GE Moore, PRITCHARD & ROSS LO: I will understand GE Moore’s idea of naturalistic fallacy. STARTER TASK: Read through the exam essay from.
 AJ Ayer’s emotivism Hmk: Revise for assessment for next WEEK. Additional Challenge: Produce a revision sheet on Naturalism, Intuitionism and Emotivism.
Introduction  Based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions  Unlike Egoism  People should act in their own self-interest  Unlike.
Meta-ethics What is Meta Ethics?.
{ Cognitive Theories of Meta Ethics Is ‘abortion is wrong’ a fact, or opinion? Jot down your thoughts on a mwb Can ethical statements be proved true or.
Philosophy 219 Introduction to Moral Theory. Theoretical vs. Practical  One of the ways in which philosophers (since Aristotle) subdivide the field of.
Meta Ethics The Language of Ethics.
Introduction to Moral Theory
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Moral Theory Review.
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Chapter 1 Understanding Ethics
‘Good’ Functional Moral Descriptive Prescriptive
Contemporary Moral Problems
Meta-ethics revision summary
Ethical Thought 1 e Intuitionism
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Introduction to Moral Theory
Situation ethics lesson 2
Pluralism and Particularism
Introduction to Ethical Theory
The Naturalistic Fallacy:
Prescriptivism “You cannot derive an ought from an is.”
Introduction to Moral Theory
Meta Ethics Revision.
On whiteboards… Write down everything a brief summary of ethical naturalism, including criticisms.
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Meta Ethics Meta ethics defined means ‘after or beyond ethics’
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
Do Religious Experiences prove God exists? Discuss in pairs.
What can you remember about Intuitionism?
Meta-Ethics Objectives:
CEDAR - DCT Meta ethics Theological voluntarism
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Think, pair, share A: What is the principle of sufficient reason? B: What does empiricism mean? A: What did Hume say about the cosmological argument? B:
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
Recap Normative Ethics
On whiteboards… Write down everything you remember about ethical naturalism. Include the criticisms and the difference between UT and VE.
What were the 3 arguments Hume gave against moral realism?
On your whiteboard: Define/explain these terms: Cognitivism
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
The Cosmological argument
Non-Cognitive theories of meta- ethics
Key terms recap Cognitivism
WORDS - fallacy, illogical, meaningless, empirical, verifiable
What were the 3 arguments Hume gave against moral realism?
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
‘A business does not have to act morally’
Outline the naturalistic fallacy
‘Torture is Good’ How does that phrase make you feel?
Do these phrases describe: Meta or Normative ethics?
Think, Pair, Share A: What is the Summum Bonum? B: What is the Categorical imperative? A: Who was J.S Mill? B: What is the Hedonic Calculus?
By the end of this lesson you will have:
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
The Meaning of Morality
Make a list of 5 things that you would say might be wrong in certain situations Compare your list with the person next to you and come up with a common.
The Last Module… eeeeek!
Intuitionism Explore and Evaluate the strengths and problems of Intuitionism as ethical language.
Meta-Ethics Intuitionism What is goodness? G.E. Moore
Introduction - Naturalism
Professional Ethics Exercise Questions.
Presentation transcript:

Think, Pair, Share A: What is your intuition? B: Is intuition something we should rely on? A: Give an example to illustrate how we might use intuition in an ethical dilemma. B: Give an example to illustrate how we might use intuition in an ethical dilemma.

Intuitionism

Learning Outcomes To be able to explain the general ethical theory of Intuitionism. To be able to analysis the different views of G.E Moore, W.D Ross and H.A Prichard. To be able to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of intuitionism.

Intuitionism (Cognitive) Ethical Intuitionism is an absolutist and realist theory. This approach to ethics was first put forward in the early 20th century by the English philosophers W.D Ross (1877-1971) and G.E Moore (1873-1958). Intuitionists believe that moral norms have an objective existence that is independent of human experience. Morality is intuitive.

G.E Moore Research Nietzsche’s criticisms of G.E Moore. What did he mean by the term ‘ethically colour blind’? Right acts are those that produce the most good BUT goodness cannot be defined. We cannot use our senses but we can use our moral intuition. We recognise goodness when we see it – ‘a simple notion’. According to Intuitionists, when we say something is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ we are referring to properties that we cannot define. However we intuitively know what they mean. Moore, writing in his Principia Ethica, sums it up in this way: ‘We know what yellow is and can recognise it whenever it is seen, but we cannot actually define yellow. In the same way we know what good is. But we cannot actually define it...’

Think, Pair, Share In the same way you do not have to experience a killing to know that ‘Murder is wrong’. A moral norm such as ‘you shall not kill’ is determined without reference to any murders. The starting point is self evident. What is the difference between the way intuitionism and Ethical Naturalism explain the phrase ‘Do not Murder’. Discuss in pairs. According to ethical naturalism, the statement can be verified by observing the act of murder and its consequences. For intuitionism, no such analysis is need; we know murder is bad through our intuition.

W. D. Ross: Prima Facie Can you find and research W.D Ross’ 7 prima facie principles? List them in your notes with an explanation of the meaning: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Intuitionists believe that there are foundation moral principles from which moral laws develop. Ross called these prima facie (at first appearance), meaning that on the face of it they are evidentially true. They are: Beneficence Faithfulness in relationships Gratitude for favours done to you. Justice Non-maleficence Promise keeping Self-improvement These core values are self-evident. If these conflict, follow the one we think is right in that situation. However, he doesn’t say how we decide this.

Intuitionism - Cognitive H.A Prichard No definition can be given to the word ‘ought’ however everyone can recognise when we ought to do a certain action. Two types of thinking – 1) reason (looks at the facts in a situation) and 2) intuition (decides what to do). However, due to the fact we have different morals to each other, it is not always appropriate to use intuition to prove intrinsic goodness of any action. Only the obligation in the situation. People’s morals differed as some people have clear intuitions than others.

Intuitionism in more detail… Read the extract and make a note of 5 key piece of information from it. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Stretch yourself: Research and find what Henry Sidgwick says about what our moral judgement is based on.

Evaluating Intuitionism Read through the arguments and sort them into strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Stretch yourself: Explain in your own words the differences between intuitionism and naturalism.

Opinion Line: ‘Intuitionism is a better way to discover what is good than naturalism is’ Read the Statement – Think carefully and silently for 1 minute – what do you think and feel about this and why? Post-it: Take your post-it note and clearly write your view with a reason for it. Try not to be vague about WHY you feel how you do. Stick your opinion to where you feel it best belongs on the opinion line at the front of our classroom.