Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Grounded: Transcriptional Pausing in Naive mESCs
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
A New Map for Navigating the Yeast Epigenome
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
The Curious Case of Bivalent Marks
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Splicing-Dependent RNA Polymerase Pausing in Yeast
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Cell-Type-Specific Control of Enhancer Activity by H3K9 Trimethylation
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Epigenetic Silencing of the p16INK4a Tumor Suppressor Is Associated with Loss of CTCF Binding and a Chromatin Boundary  Michael Witcher, Beverly M. Emerson 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Proteins Kinases: Chromatin-Associated Enzymes?
Spatial and Temporal Recruitment of Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivators Involves Chromosomal Looping and Polymerase Tracking  Qianben Wang, Jason S.
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Epigenetic Control of the S100A6 (Calcyclin) Gene Expression
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
A Role for Mammalian Sin3 in Permanent Gene Silencing
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Yongfeng Shang, Xiao Hu, James DiRenzo, Mitchell A Lazar, Myles Brown 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 381-391 (August 2005) Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation and HP1γ Are Associated with Transcription Elongation through Mammalian Chromatin  Christopher R. Vakoc, Sean A. Mandat, Benjamin A. Olenchock, Gerd A. Blobel  Molecular Cell  Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 381-391 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Levels of H3K9 Trimethylation Correlate with Transcriptional Activity in Mammalian Chromatin (A) ChIP assay with three anti-H3K9-trimethyl antibodies and control IgG in G1E cells before or after differentiation induction with tamoxifen (OHT) for 21 hr. PCR primers were specific for promoters and transcribed regions in genes that are activated (β-major, band3), repressed (GATA-2, c-myc), or unchanged (GAPDH). Major satellite repeats served as positive controls. Results are the average of two or three independent experiments. Error bars denote standard deviation. IgG signals that appear absent are less than 0.001. (B) ChIP with anti-dimethyl H3K9 at the β-major gene, the GATA-2 gene, and major satellite repeats. (C and D) ChIP with anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab8898) and anti-pol II in primary erythroid cells and primary T cells, respectively. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Distribution of H3K9 Methylation in Mammalian Chromatin Is Distinct from Other Histone Trimethyl-Lysine Marks (A) ChIP analysis in G1E cells with anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab8898), anti-trimethyl H3K27 (07-449), and anti-trimethyl H4K20 (07-463) at the β-major gene and, as controls, major satellite repeats and MYT1. (B) ChIP analysis of the IL-2 gene with anti-trimethyl H3K4 (07-473) and anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab8898) before and after T cell activation. Position of primer pairs are indicated below. (C) Trimethyl HK9-specific antibodies (ab8898, ab1186, and 07-442) fail to react with transcriptionally active chromatin in S. cerevisiae. ChIP analysis with chromatin from cells grown in glucose- or galactose-containing media. A trimethyl H3K4 antibody served as a positive control. Primers were specific for the GAL10 5′-transcribed region. ChIP analysis of the active β-major gene in G1E cells was performed in parallel for comparison. (D) Double ChIP of the β-major globin gene in differentiated G1E cells with anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab1186) antibody for the first immunoprecipitation (1st IP) followed by elution and reimmunoprecipitation with the indicated second antibody (IgG or anti-trimethyl H3K4 07-473). The graph shown is the average of two independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 HP1γ Is Associated with Active Genes ChIP Analysis with Anti-HP1γ and Anti-trimethyl H3K9: (A), at the c-kit gene in G1E cells (07-442) (B), at the IL-2 gene in primary T cells (ab8898) (C), at the β-major gene in primary proerythroblasts (ab8898). Position of primer pairs is indicated below. The graphs shown are the averages of three (A) or two (B and C) independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. (D) HP1γ is physically associated with RNA polymerase II. Immunoprecipitation with anti-HP1γ antibodies or nonimmune IgG (IgG) followed by Western blot with antibodies raised against unphosphorylated RNA polymerase II (8wg16), RNA polymerase II phosphorylated on serine 5 (H14), or on serine 2 (H5). 10% of unprecipitated material was analyzed in parallel (input). Of note, the H5 antibody may recognize serine 5 CTD phosphorylation in addition to serine 2 phosphorylation (Jones et al., 2004). Molecular Cell 2005 19, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 H3K9 Trimethylation and HP1γ Association Is Dynamic and Depends on Elongating RNA Polymerase II (A) Time-course ChIP of the transcribed region of the GATA-2 gene with anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab8898) and HP1γ at indicated time points after tamoxifen treatment of G1E cells. Result shown is a representative experiment. (B) ChIP with anti-trimethyl H3K9 (ab1186 and ab8898), anti-HP1γ, and anti-RNA polymerase II at the induced β-major gene after DRB treatment in MEL cells. The graph shown is the average of two independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 381-391DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions