Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BioVIEW Suite P Automated Chicago Analysis. Automated Chicago Classification Analysis Advanced Analysis Tutorial.
Advertisements

Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Achalasia
Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distention in reflux patients with hiatal hernia  Peter J. Kahrilas*,
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 148, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2015)
An Update on Anorectal Disorders for Gastroenterologists
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages e2 (February 2013)
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Obesity: A Challenge to Esophagogastric Junction Integrity
Reproducibility and Agreement of Pharyngeal Automated Impedance Manometry With Videofluoroscopy  Taher I. Omari, Athanasios Papathanasopoulos, Eddy Dejaeger,
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Biomarkers of Reflux Disease
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages e17-e18 (April 2013)
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages e7 (April 2012)
Figure 3 High-resolution manometry of achalasia subtypes
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Figure 2 Key metrics of pressure topography (Clouse)
Achalasia With Dense Eosinophilic Infiltrate Responds to Steroid Therapy  Edoardo Savarino, Lorenzo Gemignani, Patrizia Zentilin, Nicola De Bortoli, Alberto.
Jaime A. Duffield, Peter W. Hamer, Richard Heddle, Richard H
An Involuntary and Unexpected Treatment of Nutcracker Esophagus
Normal Values of Pharyngeal and Esophageal 24-Hour pH Impedance in Individuals on and off Therapy and Interobserver Reproducibility  Frank Zerbib, Sabine.
Clinical Challenges and Images in GI
Volume 150, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
High-Resolution Manometry Studies Are Frequently Imperfect but Usually Still Interpretable  Sabine Roman, Peter J. Kahrilas, Lubomyr Boris, Kiran Bidari,
Sibu Varghese, Pierre Lao–Sirieix, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald 
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Figure 5 High-resolution manometry studies performed
Erroneous Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Achalasia
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Peter J. Kahrilas, Guy Boeckxstaens  Gastroenterology 
A 78-Year-Old Man With Difficulty Swallowing
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Many Patients Continue Using Proton Pump Inhibitors After Negative Results From Tests for Reflux Disease  Andrew J. Gawron, Jami Rothe, Angela J. Fought,
Benjamin Basseri, MD, Jeffrey L
Challenging the Limits of Esophageal Manometry
Radu Tutuian, Donald O Castell 
A Comparison of Symptom Severity and Bolus Retention With Chicago Classification Esophageal Pressure Topography Metrics in Patients With Achalasia  Frédéric.
How to Effectively Use High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry
High-Resolution Manometry and Impedance-pH/Manometry: Valuable Tools in Clinical and Investigational Esophagology  Peter J. Kahrilas, Daniel Sifrim  Gastroenterology 
Veniamin Y. Sidorov, Marcella C. Woods, John P. Wikswo 
AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy and simultaneous diverticuloseptotomy in coincident epiphrenic diverticulum and achalasia  Torsten Beyna, MD, Jennis Kandler,
Development of Esophageal Peristalsis in Preterm and Term Neonates
Esophageal function testing
Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004–2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry  Salih Samo, Dustin A. Carlson,
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Normal Values of Esophageal Distensibility and Distension-Induced Contractility Measured by Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry  Dustin A. Carlson,
Volume 133, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves
Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry 
Distal Esophageal Spasm Evolving to Achalasia in High Resolution
Caitlin C. Murphy, Kristin Wallace, Robert S. Sandler, John A. Baron 
Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages 7-10 (January 2019)
Baby-Epsilon Steps Toward the Triple Aim
Reflux Is Unlikely to Occur During Stable Sleep
Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Normal or Minor Motor Function Abnormalities Detected by High-resolution Esophageal Manometry  Karthik Ravi, Laurel.
Abdominal Pain With Fluctuating Elevation of Amylase and AST
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
Electronic Clinical Challenges and Images in GI
Foregut function before and after lung transplant
The Future of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Statin Use Is Associated With a Decreased Risk of Barrett’s Esophagus
Abnormal Gastrointestinal Imaging in a Patient With Dyspepsia
Presentation transcript:

Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages 469-475 (August 2011) Distal Esophageal Spasm in High-Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography: Defining Clinical Phenotypes  John E. Pandolfino, Sabine Roman, Dustin Carlson, Daniel Luger, Kiran Bidari, Lubomyr Boris, Monika A. Kwiatek, Peter J. Kahrilas  Gastroenterology  Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages 469-475 (August 2011) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058 Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The concept of reduced distal latency in spasm as described by Behar and Biancani.11 (A) The latency of propagation for normal controls (blue circles) and a patient with spasm (white circles) adapted from Behar and Biancani. The latency interval was measured using conventional manometry as time from onset of contraction at sensor 21 to onset of contraction at sensor 1. The latency interval was determined to be a marker of the inhibitory ganglionic integrity, suggesting that patients with spasm had evidence of reduced latency and premature contraction. In the right panels, the latency interval plots from the conventional manometry study are superimposed on EPT tracings of a swallow with normal latency (top) and short latency (bottom). In each case, the time and sensor position scales are adjusted to approximate those of the conventional manometry tracing. Gastroenterology 2011 141, 469-475DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Measurement of DL and CFV in an EPT plot of a normal swallow. The black line is the 30-mm Hg isobaric contour circumscribing areas on the plot with intraluminal pressure >30 mm Hg. The peristaltic esophageal contraction has 2 pressure troughs, 1 centered proximally at P and 1 distally at D. The CDP represents the inflexion point in the contractile front propagation. It is localized by fitting 2 tangential lines to the initial and terminal portions of the 30-mm Hg isobaric contours and noting intersection of the lines (white dot). The CFV is calculated by taking the best-fit tangent of the 30-mm Hg isobaric contour between P and CDP. The distal latency is measured from UES relaxation to the CDP. Gastroenterology 2011 141, 469-475DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 EPT phenotypes of abnormal propagation based on DL and CFV measurements. The most common phenotypes were A and B with normal latency and a large defect in the 30-mm Hg isobaric contour. The swallow in (A) with a rapid contraction and a large proximal break fulfills criteria for both weak peristalsis and rapid contraction. (B) Illustrates the problem with measuring CFV with weak peristalsis and a nonpropagating segmental contraction. Although the CDP provides a reasonable temporal end point for measuring velocity, the large break eliminates any appropriate proximal landmark resulting in what would be a negative CFV. However, the DL is normal suggesting this to be an artifact of weak peristalsis. The swallow in (C) is also associated with a large break (7.5 cm); however, it is also associated with short latency (3.0 s) and rapid CFV (45 cm/s), thereby representing a distinct phenotype compared to (A) and (B). The swallow in (D) is premature (DL = 4.4 s) with a normal CFV (6 cm/s). This swallow is associated with impaired EGJ relaxation and bolus pressurization consistent with functional EGJ obstruction or an achalasia variant. Gastroenterology 2011 141, 469-475DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Blinded diagnoses of 91 EPT studies with rapid propagation subdivided into studies with short distal latency (<4.5 s) or rapid CFV. Patients with premature contractions defined by a distal latency <4.5 seconds were uniformly diagnosed with a spastic disorder of the distal esophagus. In contrast, patients with only a rapid CFV were likely to have a nonspastic disorder, especially weak peristalsis. Gastroenterology 2011 141, 469-475DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions