Theme 2 – F – The Rejection of Religion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exam Layout.
Advertisements

The Design Argument Richard Dawkins – ( ) Richard Dawkins, FRS, FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular.
a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your.
Why Philosophy? Myron A. Penner. Overview I.How + What = Why II.Scholarship: Research Areas III.Scholarship: Teaching.
Philosophy of Religion Michael Lacewing
RS Exam Revision Stacked, 3-D text at dramatic angle (Intermediate)
Relationship between Science and Religion. Conflict Model Science and Religion are ‘at war’ – they have different methods of examining the same evidence,
Taking it further: new atheism. The new atheism (1) New atheism: ‘religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed.
Atheism and Critique of Religious belief!
Christian Philosophy and Applied Ethics. Is something boring because of it or because of you?
Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology Responding to the New Atheists March 13, 2015.
Perspectives on Religious Belief: Evidentialism-1  Definition: belief in God must be supported by objective evidence  Natural theology: attempt to prove.
This week’s aims To explain and analyse Bultmann’s approach to religious language To review the religious language unit To practise planning and writing.
1.The argument makes it likely that there are lots of worldmakers. Strength: Man made things often require many creators. For example a house needs many.
Religion and Philosophy Understanding the connection between religion and philosophy.
Recap  What is intelligent design?  What is irreducible complexity?
10MINUTES ANSWER QUESTIONS INTO BOOK THIS WILL BE MARKED AND GRADED 1.How do some Catholics combine the scientific explanation with belief in God? (4)
L/O: To explore Hume’s criticisms of the Design Argument.
Give definitions Give an opinion and justify that opinion Explain religious attitudes Respond to a statement – 2 sides.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
Effective participator Atheism and the Media Richard Dawkins Aim: To understand what Richard Dawkins says about religion(L4). Goal: To consider the factors.
Atheism Symbol designed by the Athiest International Alliance in 2007.
Believing in God (need only Christian knowledge in this unit)
AQA Religious Philosophical & Ethical Studies
Philosophy of Religion
Starter for 5! Which term means that our actions have consequences, i.e. good actions bring good consequences and bad actions bring bad consequences? Which.
Introduction to Religion
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
SCIENCE & KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Evaluation Questions Whether inductive arguments for God’s existence are persuasive. The extent to which the Kalam cosmological argument is convincing.
AO2 Questions Evaluating the Teleological Argument
Religious responses to the verification principle
DIL check 1. Complete all the tasks in the booklet up to page 10 Summary of analogy 2. Write a one page revision summary of ‘Religious language as non-
Issues relating to rejection of religion: Atheism
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
Taking it further: new atheism
Christianity Theme 3 D The relationship between religion and society: respect and recognition and the ways that religious traditions view other religions.
Think: Why did he say it was like confessing to a murder?
Welcome back to Religious Studies
Religious language as non-cognitive and mythical:
Christianity Theme 3 E Specification Content
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
CRITIQUES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF
What do these pictures have in common?
Component 2: Philosophy of Religion
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
Supportive evidence – different forms of myths to convey meaning: creation myths; myths of good against evil; heroic myths. Myths help to overcome.
CRITIQUES OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
DIL check 1. Complete all the tasks in the booklet up to page 10 Summary of analogy 2. Write a one page revision summary of ‘Religious language as non-
Do Now As you attempt the word search can you think of how you might use some of the 99 Islamic Names of God to answer some of the following GCSE questions.
Exam Skills Question 1 – Multiple choice question Worth 1 mark
Critiques of Religious belief .
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
ETHICS - Theme 2: Deontological Ethics Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
Religious Experience - Miracles
By the end of this lesson you will have:
Challenges against Inductive arguments
Christianity – Theme 3 – Challenges From Science
By the end of today’s lesson you will
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Miracles – A Comparative Study of Two Key Scholars
Argument for the existence of God
How do secularists think about decisions?
What is secularism? What is secularism?.
Ungraded quiz Unit 2.
Philosopher’s Views on Religious Experience - 2.
Ethics, Philosophy and Religion
Presentation transcript:

Theme 2 – F – The Rejection of Religion

AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Spec Check – Component 2: Philosophy Theme 2: Challenges to religious belief AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding E. Issues relating to the rejection of religion: Atheism: Rejection of belief in deities; the difference between agnosticism and atheism; the rise of New Atheism (antitheism); its main criticisms of religion: non-thinking; infantile worldview; impedes scientific progress. Religious responses to the challenge of New Atheism: rejection by religious groups of New Atheist claims regarding incompatibility of science and religion; increase in fundamentalist religious activity relating to morality and community; increase in religious apologists in media.

LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism. What is atheism? Atheism comes from the Greek meaning a (not/without) and theos (God). Atheism is therefore “a belief that there is no such thing as God.” What term is given to someone who supports atheism? Exam board’s definition LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism.

LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism. What is atheism? Atheism Strong atheism Explicit denial of the existence of God/gods. A position that asserts there is no God. Weak atheism An absence of belief in God. (This could include those who are too young, the mentally ill or those who have never given the question of God’s existence any thought.) LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism.

LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism. What is agnosticism? Read ‘the difference between agnosticism and atheism’ on page 35 of your EDUQAS textbook and answer the following: Which scholar first introduced the terms ‘weak and strong’ atheist? What is the difference between a weak and a strong atheist? Which author can we use to illustrate protest atheism? Who first used the term ‘agnosticism’? Complete this sentence ‘agnosticism is not a creed but a __________ ?’ LO1: To know the difference between atheism and agnosticism.

LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist. Why are people atheist? Beat the booklet! List reasons why people may be atheist. You get one point per reason that is mentioned in the booklet. You get two points for each reason that you think of that is not in the booklet. No looking in the booklet – that’s called cheating! You have 3 minutes … Go! LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist.

LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist. Why are people atheist? LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist.

LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist. Why are people atheist? Read pages 34 of your EDUQAS textbook to understand how a rejection of deities occurred Make notes as you read and condense into 5 key points DEITY = GOD LIKE LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist.

LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist. Why are people atheist? ‘Religulous’ is an American documentary film written by and starring comedian Bill Maher. The title is a combination of the words ‘religious’ and ‘ridiculous’. In the film, Maher interviews people from various religions and challenges their beliefs. Whilst watching, jot down any arguments that support atheism. Also, consider whether the way in which religious people are represented is fair? Is it objective? Is it offensive? Religulous LO2: To consider why people choose to be atheist.

The rise of New Atheism (antitheism); Anti-theism is the new atheism. It is the idea that religion is evil / wrong and religious believers become a subject of anger. The four horsemen of new atheism are: Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitches, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris

Its main criticisms of religion: non-thinking; infantile worldview; impedes scientific progress Religion as non-thinking – They think faith is irrational as it is opposed to evidence. Dawkins compares religion to the tooth fairy and Santa – people should grow out of it. Non-thinking is dangerous and leads to fanaticism.

Its main criticisms of religion: non-thinking; infantile worldview; impedes scientific progress Religion is an infantile worldview – Religious people are very naïve and not seeing the world for what it actually is. It encourages believers to only focus on their small world, not the whole universe.

Its main criticisms of religion: non-thinking; infantile worldview; impedes scientific progress Religion impedes scientific progress – Religion claims things whereas science has empirical evidence. Atheism is rational and religion is irrational and superstitious. Blind faith leads to violence which science doesn’t.

AO1 Skills Imagine you have the question: ‘Explain how new atheism challenges religious belief’ (20) You would have to talk about the following areas: Religion as non-thinking Religion as infantile worldview Religion as impeding scientific progress Using the PEEL structure, we are going to do an ‘essay snake’ – you write the Point, then pass it on and write the Explain on the next sheet and so forth

Challenges against New-Atheism

AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Spec Check AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding E. Issues relating to the rejection of religion: Atheism: Rejection of belief in deities; the difference between agnosticism and atheism; the rise of New Atheism (antitheism); its main criticisms of religion: non-thinking; infantile worldview; impedes scientific progress. Religious responses to the challenge of New Atheism: rejection by religious groups of New Atheist claims regarding incompatibility of science and religion; increase in fundamentalist religious activity relating to morality and community; increase in religious apologists in media.

Religious responses to the rejection of Atheism There are 3 responses to new atheism from religious thinkers 1. Science and religion can be compatible 2. There is an increase in fundamental religious activity relating to morality and community 3. There is an increase in religious apologists in the media Write these three headings in your workbook

Religious responses to the rejection of Atheism TASK: Read pages 38 – 39 of your EDUQAS textbook and place these key words under the right heading “A scientific explanation of the world may explain the big bang….the religious explanation might speak of God bringing the world into existence” “John Polkinghorne sees no competition…..different levels of explanation need weaving together to provide a rich and comprehensive whole” “However, [Islamic fundamentalism] can also apply to law abiding groups following Islam who seek to influence society through social and political action” “Alister McGrath commented that argument does not create conviction, but the lack of it destroys belief” “In the UK organisations such as the Christian Institute promote a conservative viewpoint founded on a belief in Biblical inerrancy”

Religious responses to the rejection of Atheism 1. Science and religion can be compatible 2. There is an increase in fundamental religious activity relating to morality and community 3. There is an increase in religious apologists in the media “John Polkinghorne sees no competition…..different levels of explanation need weaving together to provide a rich and comprehensive whole” “A scientific explanation of the world may explain the big bang….the religious explanation might speak of God bringing the world into existence” “In the UK organisations such as the Christian Institute promote a conservative viewpoint founded on a belief in Biblical inerrancy” “However, [Islamic fundamentalism] can also apply to law abiding groups following Islam who seek to influence society through social and political action” “Alister McGrath commented that argument does not create conviction, but the lack of it destroys belief”

AO2 Evaluation Points Dawkins the fundamentalist Some suggest that Dawkins, ironically, has become the fundamentalist that he so hates. He hates fundamentalists of religion, yet has he not become a fundamentalist of science? Melvin Tinker suggests that Dawkin’s claim that religion is a mental virus is a fallible analogy – viruses and genes are passed on through hereditary, religion is an idea not a genetic code Even, Tinker argues, if religion is seen as a meme (an idea) which is virulently passed on from one person to the next, then so can Dawkin’s arguments be seen as virulent memes

AO2 Evaluation Points Ontological Reductionism Tinker argues against Dawkin’s suggestion that the sole purpose of living is to pass on DNA (survival of the fittest) IF the only reason of living was to pass on DNA, why would we have sex for pleasure? Why would we pursue pleasure and hobbies that have nothing to do with our survival? To say that DNA is the only purpose of living, also reduces the problem of evil simply to DNA – Hitler/the Yorkshire Ripper/Salman Abedi would just all be ‘…dancing to the tune of their DNA’ (Tinker, 1989) Tinker addresses Dawkin’s accusation that religion is harmful: ‘He makes a value judgement that extremism and terror are bad but bad for whom? Not the terrorists who get to pass on their DNA’ It is undeniable that religion has caused pain and suffering in history – but so have many other institutions – is the answer to eradicate them all?

AO2 Evaluation Points Ockham’s Razor Ockham stated that ‘entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily’ For Ockham – the most simple solution is the best Ockham used the principle to argue against attempts to justify religion through reason alone He suggested that ‘faith’ is special in that it cuts out any attempt to justify it scientifically It admits that faith is separate to other lines of enquiry

AO2 Evaluation points The need for explanation Theism offers a system of belief which attempts to provide explanation for certain phenomena People crave an explanation because there are many different suggestions (religions) around the world It is arguably a metaphysical issue (not a scientific physical issue) what it is that started the world Psychologically, humans aren’t satisfied with ‘we just are’ when it comes to questions about our existence, religion offers a tool for us to explore these age old questions

AO2 - Skills Q. Have atheistic arguments been successful against religious belief? Q. Have the responses against new atheism been successful? Think, pair, share: Which arguments can we use for and against new atheism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of New Atheism? Now, EVALUATE the points TASK: AO2 write up. We will spend the next 35mins writing up an AO2 response We can then look at each others to see what we can learn for future AO2 questions ‘New Atheism is an effective challenge against Religious Belief’. Discuss this view (30)