Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant: balancing personality and control Drs. B.W. Meerbeek, PDEng. (Philips research) Drs. H.C.M. Hoonhout (Philips.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9: Customer Service via Technology
Advertisements

Information Technology Quiz Questions with Answers Part 9
IB Oral Presentation Presentation dates: January-February (tentative)
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
HELP:Listen to a website Discovering new design solutions for Web accessibility Paolo Paolini, Nicoletta Di Blas, Politecnico di Milano (Italy) Marco Speroni.
1 1 S ession 3 How to Effectively Implement Learning Objectives.
Live Chat for Information & Referral Panelists: Shye Louis, 2-1-1/LIFE LINE, Rochester NY Laura Zink Marx, NJ Partnership.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 5 Q 6Q 16Q 11Q 21 Q 7Q 12Q 17Q 22 Q 8Q 13Q 18 Q 23 Q 9 Q 14Q 19Q 24 Q 10Q 15Q 20Q 25 Final Jeopardy Writing Terms.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
March 2011 Department of Children & Families March 2011.
0 - 0.
Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.
Addition Facts
3. Sensorimotor Intelligence
CS4026 Formal Models of Computation Running Haskell Programs – power.
Google Earth Tours GoogleEarthDesign.blogspot.com Richard Treves January 2011.
Skills for Life Support Programme T: F: E: W: The Skills for Life.
Assessment, Marking & Feedback
|1 How to use this presentation? This presentation forms the basis for your own presentation Remove the slides you don't need Add your own slides in this.
Configuration management
Software change management
Alina Pommeranz, MSc in Interactive System Engineering supervised by Dr. ir. Pascal Wiggers and Prof. Dr. Catholijn M. Jonker.
Discovering Computers Fundamentals, 2012 Edition
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Creating a Multimodal Design Environment Using Speech and Sketching Aaron Adler Student Oxygen Workshop September 12, 2003.
Cognitive Systems, ICANN panel, Q1 What is machine intelligence, as beyond pattern matching, classification and prediction. What is machine intelligence,
MP Office Activity Awareness Ian Li Machine Perception Spring 2005.
TU e technische universiteit eindhoven / department of mathematics and computer science 1 Empirical Evaluation of Learning Styles Adaptation Language Natalia.
Semantic AudiovisuaL Entertainment Reusable Objects Georg Thallinger JOANNEUM RESEARCH, Austria INFSO.E2 Dissemination and Awareness Strategy Meeting,
Ability can, could and be able to.
to Effective Communication
COMPUTER INTERFACES.
SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
1 I-globe: integration. 2 scenario 3 infrastructure.
Event Reporting Discussion Workshop Template 1. Agenda 13:00 – 13:15 Introduction and overview 13:15 – 14:00 Event Reporting Lecture 14:00 – 15:00 Small.
Addition 1’s to 20.
1 By Terence James Haydock Manufacturing Cell A simulated response in Arena.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
The T ELECOM W ORLD 2006 Dr Tim Kelly, Head, Forum Team Exhibitor ’ s Meeting, 21 March 2006.
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
Interpersonal Skills Mr. Vivek Bindra Director - Global ACT
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
Definitions types added-value tutor role building-up informal learning awareness raising examples 1 Astrid Quasebart ESTA-Bildungswerk gGmbH senior project.
05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager.
1 Faculty of Construction & Land Use Teaching and Learning Forum on Outcome-based Curriculum and Criterion-referenced Assessment 1 April 2006.
Graphical User Interface Design
User Interface Design Main issues: What is the user interface How to design a user interface.
Business Analytics BI applications to support human and automated decision making Business Analytics—predict future outcomes Decision Support Systems.
Persuasive Listener in a Conversation Elisabetta Bevacqua, Chris Peters, Catherine Pelachaud (IUT de Montreuil - Paris 8)
 INTRODUCTION  STEPS OF GESTURE RECOGNITION  TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES  SPEECH WITH GESTURE  APPLICATIONS.
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
Robotics.
Bringing Robots To Life Applying Principles Of Animation To Robots Albert J.N. van Breemen Software Architecture Group Philips Research, Eindhoven, The.
Chapter 6 Building Healthy Relationships Lesson 1 Building Communication Skills >> Main Menu Next >> >> Chapter 6 Assessment Click for: Teacher’s notes.
Artificial Intelligence
Building the Design Studio of the Future Aaron Adler Jacob Eisenstein Michael Oltmans Lisa Guttentag Randall Davis October 23, 2004.
A project to develop software to assist people with autism to recognise, understand and express emotions through facial expressions,
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Management Skills Section A 1.
MS. SUHA JAWABREH LECTURE # 16 Oral Communication.
Lecture 15 – Social ‘Robots’. Lecture outline This week Selecting interfaces for robots. Personal robotics Chatbots AIML.
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO A.I. WORKING OF A.I. APPLICATIONS OF A.I. CONCLUSIONS ON A.I.
Intelligent Robot Architecture (1-3)  Background of research  Research objectives  By recognizing and analyzing user’s utterances and actions, an intelligent.
KaaShiv InfoTech presents ROBOTICS For Inplant Training / Internship, please download the "Inplant training registration form"
Strategies to develop speaking skills. Introduction Oral communication.
Slide no 1 Cognitive Systems in FP6 scope and focus Colette Maloney DG Information Society.
Artificial Intelligence
Interacting with AI Module 3 Working and living with AI
Presentation transcript:

Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant: balancing personality and control Drs. B.W. Meerbeek, PDEng. (Philips research) Drs. H.C.M. Hoonhout (Philips research) Ir. P. Bingley (Philips research) Dr. J.M.B. Terken (TU/e) First iCat user workshop – 27 th March 2006, Eindhoven

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 2 / 15 Overview Introduction Research questions and hypotheses Designing personality and levels of control Experiments in HomeLab Main findings

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 3 / 15 Background More robots in domestic environment (UNECE) –Human-robot interaction more important Media Equation (Reeves & Nass) –Social response encouraged if machine: uses full-sentence text or speech demonstrates task knowledge as well as reasoning can act autonomously on behalf of the user –Human-robot interaction human-human interaction –People assign personality to robots (a.o. Dautenhahn)

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 4 / 15 Personality and Control Personality of a machine can help users to form mental model and to interpret and predict its behaviour (Norman) –What personality do users prefer? As machines (personal robots) become more intelligent they can take over more tasks from humans –Who should be in control?

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 5 / 15 Context iCat, platform for human-robot interaction research Application: TV-assistant Facial expressions Head movement Multi-colour LEDs Camera (see) Microphone (hear) Touch sensors (feel) Speakers (speak)

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 6 / 15 Research questions Preliminary question: Is it possible to convey personality with a robot? And if so, What personality do users prefer? What level of control do users prefer? Is there an interaction between preferences for personality and for level of control?

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 7 / 15 Expectations No main preference for personality or level of control Personality should match the level of user control Low preferenceHigh preference Low preference Introvert, formal conscientious robot Extravert, agreeable, friendly robot Low user controlHigh user control Extrapolating from observations of human-human interaction:

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 8 / 15 Personality design (1) Facial expression, e.g. eyes move away Motion, e.g. head to chest Speech, e.g. low fundamental frequency (pitch) Linguistic style, e.g. use more formal words Catherine

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 9 / 15 Personality design (2) Lizzy Facial expression, e.g. more eyebrow movement Motion, e.g. faster head movements Speech, e.g. faster speech rate Linguistic style, e.g. chitchat

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 10 / 15 Levels of control Low user control –System-driven interaction style –Natural language dialogue High user control –User-driven interaction style –Command and control

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 11 / 15 Movie TV-assistant recommends programme to user Second clip First clip Catherine Lizzy Low user controlHigh user control Movie available on community website: play

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 12 / 15 Experiments Preliminary experiment demonstrated that personalities were recognized as intended Main experiment –Combinations of two personalities and two levels of control (2x2-design) –32 participants in experiment of 2 hours –Personality assessment –User preference

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 13 / 15 Summary of main findings Overall, there seemed to be a preference for Lizzy In initial interactions, low user control slightly preferred over high user control In longer term, preference may shift from low to high control Lizzy seemed most preferred with low user control Catherine matched better with high user control than with low user control People perceived more control with Lizzy than with Catherine (identical level of objective control)

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 14 / 15 Discussion Personality perception less clear in main experiment –Distributed attention Limited functionality of TV-assistant Relatively short interactions Single user

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 15 / 15 Thanks for your attention

First iCat users workshop Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant 16 / 15 Personal robots More than 6 million personal robots in 2007 Both for entertainment and household tasks Number of robots for domestic use Source: UNECE x 1 million Entertainme nt & Leisure Vacuum cleaner lawn mower Other cleaning a robot is a mechanical device which performs automated tasks, either according to direct human supervision, a pre-defined program or, a set of general guidelines, using artificial intelligence techniques.artificial intelligence