Scientific Panel Study Approval Process

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Academic Promotion at the University of Warwick

Advertisements

4/25/20151 The Code-Making Process National Electrical Contractors Association.

Enquiry Progress Give your vendor code In case of incorrect vendor code / no id registered with us, you will get this error message In case of correct.

NAVIGATING THE LAW 2012 Leadership Training

Academic Principles and Regulations Periodic Review Quality, Standards, Review and Enhancement.

Flow Chart for Initial Proposal Approval Process.

Draft Voluntary Severance Scheme May As part of Strategic review to reduce payroll costs To remain a sustainable institution To be responsive to.

A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley

HOW TO PROPOSE A COURSE OR CURRICULUM Tina Good, College Curriculum Committee Updated Fall 2014.

Ontario Colleges Multi- college Ethics Review Process On behalf of the Multi-college ethics working group Lynda Atack, Centennial College Jill Dennis,

The Cat II Review Cat IIs are normally reviewed by (in order): College (either a person or committee) Curriculum Coordinator Curriculum Council Representative.

Evaluation Process. Why an Evaluation plan now at the beginning of our project? Now that you have been successful it allows you to re-confirm the objectives.

Organizational Graphics This presentation covers why it is important to submit your logo to the survey office and the specifications of submitting your.

EDRN Biomarker Review Process Heather Kincaid, Andrew Hart, Kristen Anton, Mark Thornquist, Dan Crichton and Christos Patriotis.

On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.

Work Package 5 The way forward Utrecht 17 th January 2014 Timeline for the High Resolution study Jan Maarten van der Zwan.

WEEK 1 You have 10 seconds to name…

EDCM update Mo Sukumaran On behalf of DNOs ( WSB Chair) 1 December | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.

STSM guide COST Action FP Fibre suspension flow modelling... 1 COST Action FP1005 Fibre suspension flow modelling - a key for innovation & competitiveness.

Transfer Process from Statements of Special Educational Needs (SEN) to Education Health and Care (EHC) Plans June/July 2015.

W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, Upgrade MB, Sept. 9, 2011 Proposal Reviews - 1 Upgrade Peer Review Report Wesley H. Smith U. Wisconsin CMS Upgrade Peer Review.

Re-chartering BFD – IETF 78 Jeffrey Haas, Dave Ward,

By Caroline Kithinji KEMRI/Ethics Review Committee February, 2014 MOI IREC Annual Committee Members Workshop Kisumu Hotel KEMRI Research Review Process.

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.

Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.

CJA 354 Week 4 Learning Team Sentencing Proposal (Preparation) NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at NEW/CJA-354-Week-4-Learning-Team-

EDD 581 Week 5 Individual Action Research Proposal, Section Two To purchase this material click 581-Week-5-Individual-Action-Research-Proposal-

EDD 581 Week 7 Individual Action Research Proposal, Section Four Finalize and submit Section Four of the Action Research Proposal. To purchase this material.

EDL 535 Week 2 Learning Team Topic Selection Resources: Course textbooks and Internet search Select a topic for the staff training session assignment (due.

Taught Postgraduate Program Review

Session Sponsorship Request Procedure

Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA

Procedures for Taught Degree students seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval Does the research involve living human participants, their tissue or their.

NFHS RULES writing Process

LAS Diagnostic Timetable April May June July August

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

The final steps to the HDA project

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PHASE – Steps for PIs 3-6 months or longer

NEW DEALER APPLICATION & APPROVAL PROCESS

Report by the VICH Steering Committee on issues raised by Forum members during the 1st Outreach Forum meeting Hervé Marion, DVM VICH Secretariat.

Interim Policy for Promotion to Senior Technical Officer Process Map

IEEE 802 Process for Interactions with ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6

IBC Review Pathway Approximate Timeline Online status Online“Sub”State

Performance Process STEP PROCESS GUIDELINE DATES ACTION

Application for membership of an ISO registration body

Visual Guide to Governance & Strategy Motions Process

BSc Computing Dissertation

GHANA NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION OECD 10TH PLENARY SESSION

Registration Process for new messages

HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects

Approve a Grant Proposal

Whakatāne District Business Recovery Grant application process

Proposed WGCV CARD4L assessment process

Terms of Reference – Project Design Authority

Officer Lecturer Student Calendar 1: submit 2 : announce

Performance Evaluation 2015 Performance Evaluation Cycle

EHC process for parental requests

CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process

CSW-JETS Supplier Registration and System Use

Taught Postgraduate Program Review

Registration Process for new message variants

PROPOSED BILL IS SUBMITTED TO CLERK

DCUSA PARTY PANEL SECRETARIAT OFGEM CHANGE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

The Code-Making Process

Chair Intro/Welcome Our Objectives

JGCRP WG on Heat States and the Impact on Notification Times

Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 FULL SURVEY PROCESS

Start writing full proposal

Presentation transcript:

Scientific Panel Study Approval Process Prospective Study Lead submits completed Data Search Form and Data Sharing Agreement Project Manager forwards completed forms to Scientific Panel Scientific Panel consider proposal and completed Feedback Form (2 weeks) Feedback forms collated by Project Manager (1 week) Collated Feedback Forms Approved by Chair of Scientific Panel Collated Feedback Form sent To Study Lead for Response (1 week) Project Manager send Study Lead’s response to Chair of Scientific Panel Chair of Scientific Panel approves/asks for further clarifications on study proposal Study leads informed of outcome by Project Manager