Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heterogeneous Coding of Temporally Discounted Values in the Dorsal and Ventral Striatum during Intertemporal Choice  Xinying Cai, Soyoun Kim, Daeyeol.
Advertisements

Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
David L. Barack, Steve W.C. Chang, Michael L. Platt  Neuron 
Elizabeth V. Goldfarb, Marvin M. Chun, Elizabeth A. Phelps  Neuron 
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Neuronal Correlates of Metacognition in Primate Frontal Cortex
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2005)
René Quilodran, Marie Rothé, Emmanuel Procyk  Neuron 
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Alan N. Hampton, Ralph Adolphs, J. Michael Tyszka, John P. O'Doherty 
Daphna Shohamy, Anthony D. Wagner  Neuron 
Habit Learning by Naive Macaques Is Marked by Response Sharpening of Striatal Neurons Representing the Cost and Outcome of Acquired Action Sequences 
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz  Neuron 
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Perceptual Learning and Decision-Making in Human Medial Frontal Cortex
Neural Correlates of Knowledge: Stable Representation of Stimulus Associations across Variations in Behavioral Performance  Adam Messinger, Larry R. Squire,
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Roman F. Loonis, Scott L. Brincat, Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
Hannah M. Bayer, Paul W. Glimcher  Neuron 
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space
Differences between Neural Activity in Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum during Learning of Novel Abstract Categories  Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
A. Saez, M. Rigotti, S. Ostojic, S. Fusi, C.D. Salzman  Neuron 
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Independent Category and Spatial Encoding in Parietal Cortex
Kyoko Yoshida, Nobuhito Saito, Atsushi Iriki, Masaki Isoda 
Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory  Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague, John T.
Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Yoshihisa Tachibana, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain
Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior
Georgia G. Gregoriou, Stephen J. Gotts, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Sarah R. Heilbronner, Michael L. Platt  Neuron 
Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes Autonomously Selected Motor Plans
Prefrontal Neurons Coding Suppression of Specific Saccades
Jude F. Mitchell, Kristy A. Sundberg, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Masayuki Matsumoto, Masahiko Takada  Neuron 
Predictive Neural Coding of Reward Preference Involves Dissociable Responses in Human Ventral Midbrain and Ventral Striatum  John P. O'Doherty, Tony W.
Arielle Tambini, Nicholas Ketz, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Selection, Integration, and Conflict Monitoring
Phase Locking of Single Neuron Activity to Theta Oscillations during Working Memory in Monkey Extrastriate Visual Cortex  Han Lee, Gregory V. Simpson,
The Human Basal Forebrain Integrates the Old and the New
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
Caroline A. Montojo, Susan M. Courtney  Neuron 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Striatal Activity Underlies Novelty-Based Choice in Humans
Mariam Aly, Charan Ranganath, Andrew P. Yonelinas  Neuron 
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 743-752 (May 2012) Conserved fMRI and LFP Signals during New Associative Learning in the Human and Macaque Monkey Medial Temporal Lobe  Eric L. Hargreaves, Aaron T. Mattfeld, Craig E.L. Stark, Wendy A. Suzuki  Neuron  Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 743-752 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram Depicting the within Trial Sequence of the Conditional Motor Association Tasks Used for Monkeys and Humans (A) Monkeys initiated trials by fixating on a central spot for 500 ms. Fixation was followed by a 500 ms scene period, during which four targets were shown superimposed over a large complex visual scene that took up much of the computer monitor. The scene period was followed by a 700 ms delay period during which the scene disappeared but the four targets remained. At the end of the delay period the monkeys were cued by the disappearance of the fixation spot, and had 300 ms to make a saccade to one of the four targets. If correct, the monkeys received several drops of juice as a reward over ∼1,000 ms. The reward period was followed by an inter-trial-interval (ITI) period of 1,000 ms after which the next trial was started. If the monkeys made an error, the ITI period began immediately. (B) Human subjects initiated each trial by fixating on a centrally located “+” for 300 ms. Fixation was followed by a 500 ms stimulus period during which four targets placed in a horizontal array appeared superimposed across abstract kaleidoscopic images. The stimulus period was followed by a 700 ms wait period during which the kaleidoscopic images were removed, but the targets remained. At the end of the delay period the subjects were cued by replacing the fixation cross with the cue (“Go!”), subsequent to which they had 700 ms to press one of four button response keys that matched the horizontal array. Directly following their response the selected box was filled on the screen and feedback was presented for 800 ms: “yes” (shown in green) if they were correct, and “no” (shown in red) if they made an error. (C and D) Selected T2 weighted coronal MRI sections displaying the entorhinal and hippocampal locations (red circles) of the LFP recording sessions from monkeys A and B. In this illustration, the left side of the MRI image reflects the left hemisphere and the right side reflects the right hemisphere. Anterior-posterior locations of the slices are based on the surgical coordinates for centering the grid. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 New versus Highly Familiar Signals of the Monkey LFP and Human fMRI Individual bar graphs depict the comparisons between mean reference (red) versus mean new (blue) trials (±SEM of the differences). Top row of graphs show the results of the multiple regression analyses for different bandwidth spectra in monkeys, whereas the lower row of graphs show the results of the multiple regression analyses of the mean β values for the same bandwidth spectra for humans. (A) Results for the monkey entorhinal LFP signal multiple regression analyses for different bandwidth spectra comparing the mean β values. (B) Results for the monkey hippocampal LFP signal multiple regression analyses for different bandwidth spectra in monkeys comparing the mean β values. (C) Results of the human entorhinal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. (D) Results of the human hippocampal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. ∗∗∗p < 0.0005, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗p < 0.05. See also Figures S1 and S3. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Immediate Novelty Signals of the Monkey LFP Individual bar graphs depict the fixation task comparisons between first (gray) versus the second, third, fourth, and fifth (red) trials (±SEM of the differences). (A) Results for the monkey entorhinal LFP signal analyses showing the mean log power for the beta (left) and gamma (right) bandwidth spectra. (B) Results for the monkey hippocampal LFP signal analyses showing the mean log power for the beta (left) and gamma (right) bandwidth spectra. ∗∗∗p < 0.0005 and ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S3. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Trial Outcome Signals of the Monkey LFP and Human fMRI Individual bar graphs depict the comparisons between mean correct (blue) versus mean error (red) trials (±SEM of the differences). (A) Results for the monkey entorhinal LFP signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. (B) Results for the monkey hippocampal LFP signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. (C) Results of the human entorhinal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. (D) Results of the human hippocampal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. See also Figure S3. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Trial Outcome in the Human Striatum Bar graphs depict the mean response of striatal ROIs to correct (blue) versus error (red) trials (±SEM of the differences). The striatum was anatomically divided into the anterior (ant.) putamen (A), posterior (post.) putamen (B), nucleus accumbens (C), and caudate (D). Results reflect the mean β values obtained by multiple linear regression averaged across all voxels defined by the anatomical mask. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. See also Figure S3. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Learning and Immediate Novelty Signals of the Monkey LFP and Human fMRI (A) Bar graphs depicting the results of the monkey entorhinal LFP multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values across the different learning strengths (red), reference (blue), and initial presentation (gray) trials for the different bandwidth spectra. The panel shows the beta bandwidth comparison, whereas the right panel shows the gamma bandwidth comparison. (B) Results for the monkey hippocampal LFP multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values across the different learning strengths (red), reference (blue), and initial presentation (gray) trials for the different bandwidth spectra using the same organization as described for (C). (C) Results of the human entorhinal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values across the different learning strengths (red), reference (blue), and initial presentation (gray) trials. (D) Results of the human hippocampal fMRI BOLD signal multiple regression analyses comparing the mean β values as in (C). ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. See also Figures S2 and S3. Neuron 2012 74, 743-752DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.029) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions