Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Advertisements

Structural Analysis of Nanoscale Self-Assembled Discoidal Lipid Bilayers by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy  Ying Li, Aleksandra Z. Kijac, Stephen G. Sligar,
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Solid-State NMR Characterization of Gas Vesicle Structure
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Modeling an In-Register, Parallel “Iowa” Aβ Fibril Structure Using Solid-State NMR Data from Labeled Samples with Rosetta  Nikolaos G. Sgourakis, Wai-Ming.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Michael Adrian, Fernaldo Richtia Winnerdy, Brahim Heddi, Anh Tuân Phan 
Tae-Joon Park, Ji-Sun Kim, Hee-Chul Ahn, Yongae Kim 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Jefferson D. Knight, Joseph J. Falke  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
PH-Dependent Conformation, Dynamics, and Aromatic Interaction of the Gating Tryptophan Residue of the Influenza M2 Proton Channel from Solid-State NMR 
Interactions between Charged Polypeptides and Nonionic Surfactants
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Extracting the Excitonic Hamiltonian of the Fenna-Matthews-Olson Complex Using Three-Dimensional Third-Order Electronic Spectroscopy  Dugan Hayes, Gregory S.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
Spectral Snapshots of Bacterial Cell-Wall Composition and the Influence of Antibiotics by Whole-Cell NMR  Rie Nygaard, Joseph A.H. Romaniuk, David M.
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Sofia Yu. Khaitlina, Hanna Strzelecka-Gołaszewska  Biophysical Journal 
Haden L. Scott, Justin M. Westerfield, Francisco N. Barrera 
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Cyclic N-Terminal Loop of Amylin Forms Non Amyloid Fibers
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Biophysical Characterization of Styryl Dye-Membrane Interactions
Volume 96, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
K.J. Tielrooij, D. Paparo, L. Piatkowski, H.J. Bakker, M. Bonn 
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Two Latent and Two Hyperstable Polymeric Forms of Human Neuroserpin
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Vesna Serrano, Wenge Liu, Stefan Franzen  Biophysical Journal 
Time-Resolved NMR: Extracting the Topology of Complex Enzyme Networks
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Time-Resolved NMR: Extracting the Topology of Complex Enzyme Networks
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Saroj Kumar, Andreas Barth  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 180-191 (January 2009) Induced Secondary Structure and Polymorphism in an Intrinsically Disordered Structural Linker of the CNS: Solid-State NMR and FTIR Spectroscopy of Myelin Basic Protein Bound to Actin  Mumdooh A.M. Ahmed, Vladimir V. Bamm, Lichi Shi, Marta Steiner-Mosonyi, John F. Dawson, Leonid Brown, George Harauz, Vladimir Ladizhansky  Biophysical Journal  Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 180-191 (January 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Assessment of actin polymerization by salt using SDS-PAGE. Lanes 1 and 2 are the actin and rmMBP controls, respectively. Lanes 3 and 4 are the supernatant and pellet, respectively, obtained by ultracentrifugation of the G-actin sample. The absence of any actin in the pellet indicates minimal polymerization in the absence of rmMBP. Lanes 5 and 6 represent the supernatant and pellet fractions, respectively, of salt-induced F-actin, confirming the integrity of the original G-actin preparation; 20 μL of each protein sample (actin at 5 μM concentration) were applied to lanes 1–6. (B) Interaction of rmMBP with G-actin. In lanes 7–12, each adjacent pair of lanes marked S and P represents supernatant and pellet, respectively, obtained by ultracentrifugation of the complex formed by the interaction of rmMBP and G-actin in G-buffer under nonpolymerizing conditions. The molar ratio of [G-actin]/[MBP] was 1:1.6 (lanes 7 and 8), 1:1.7 (lanes 9 and 10), and 1:1.8 (lanes 11 and 12). (C) Interaction of rmMBP with F-actin. Lanes 13–20 represent the result of bundling of salt-produced F-actin by rmMBP. The molar ratios of [actin]/[MBP] were 1:0.9 (lanes 13 and 14), 1:1.0 (lanes 15 and 16), 1:1.1 (lanes 17 and 18), and 1:1.2 (lanes 19 and 20). The final actin concentration in all samples was 10 μM. The samples were mixed with loading dye at 1:1 volume ratio, reducing the actin concentration in all samples to 5 μM, and the rmMBP concentration was as indicated above. Lanes 7–20: 10 μL of sample were applied to each lane. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TEM of rmMBP-actin bundles obtained at a 1:1.5 molar ratio of actin to rmMBP and negatively stained with uranyl acetate. The image was captured on a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope, using a fourfold-diluted fraction of a preparation typical of that used for NMR spectroscopy. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATR-FTIR spectroscopic measurements of amide-proton exchange in the rmMBP-F-actin assemblies. (A) Spectra for the dry film before soaking with D2O (black curve) and at 6 h after adding D2O (red curve). Amide I and II bands for both fully isotopically labeled rmMBP and unlabeled actin (two major bands for β-and α-structures are observed) in the protonated state, as well as amide I′ and II′ bands for the deuterated fractions of both rmMBP and actin, are indicated. (B) A series of FTIR spectra at different time points after adding D2O as indicated. The spectra in both panels A and B are normalized to the integrated peak intensity of the amide I band. The amide II′ band for deuterated rmMBP increases very rapidly within the first second of the time course, as compared to the increase in the corresponding band in actin. Later on, the intensity of the rmMBP amide II′ band very quickly reaches near-saturation, whereas that of the actin amide II′ band continues to increase almost linearly. (C) The absorbance as a function of time for deuterated rmMBP amide II′ (red curve), deuterated actin amide II′ (green curve), and deuterated rmMBP amide I′ (blue curve). The solid lines are the global exponential fitting results, whereas the scattered points are the experimental values of the absolute absorbance. The points are not normalized. The initial drop in intensity is due to the swelling effect on the addition of D2O to the dry film. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 13C CP-MAS spectra (A and B), 15N CP-MAS spectra (C and D), and INEPT-MAS spectra (E and F) of uniformly 13C,15N-labeled 18.5 kDa rmMBP in rmMBP-actin complex as a function of temperature, as indicated in the figure. The 13C CP-MAS spectra were collected with an acquisition time of 30 ms, with 256 scans and a CP proton-carbon contact time of 2 ms. The 15N CP-MAS spectra were collected with an acquisition time of 25 ms, with 64 and 256 scans for C and D, respectively, and with a CP contact time of 2 ms. The INEPT-MAS spectra were collected with an acquisition time of 30 ms and 512 scans. All 13C spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance III 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with a triple-resonance 3.2 mm E-free probe at a 14 kHz MAS rate, whereas 15N spectra were collected on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz equipped with a triple-resonance 3.2 mm probe at 12 kHz MAS. Data were processed with 10 Hz exponential line-broadening before Fourier transformation. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Series of 2D 13C-13C correlation spectra of uniformly 13C,15N-labeled rmMBP in the rmMBP-actin complex. In all experiments, the indirect and direct acquisition times were 7.6 and 12 ms, and the spectra were apodized with a π/2-shifted sine-squared window function before Fourier transformation. The first contour is cut at 4.5 times the noise floor and each subsequent contour level is multiplied by 1.15. The regions indicated by dashed rectangles are expanded in Fig. 6 for secondary structure analysis. (A and B) Aliphatic regions of DARR experiments collected at 274K and 255K, respectively, at 600 MHz. Both DARR spectra were acquired with 64 scans per t1 point. (C) Aliphatic region of the SPC53 double-quantum correlation spectrum collected at 600 MHz, 248K, and with 56 scans per t1 point. All crosspeaks in this spectrum are negative, indicating that they are all due to one-bond correlations. (D) Aliphatic region of TOBSY spectrum collected at 278K, at 800 MHz, with 128 scans per t1 point. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Formation of the secondary structure in rmMBP bound to actin and comparisons with the 2D plots constructed using chemical shift assignments of rmMBP dissolved in 30% TFE (37) (BMRB accession number 6100) and in aqueous 100 mM KCl solution (55) (BMRB accession number 15131). (A) The Ala Cα-Cβ region extracted from the TOBSY spectrum shown in Fig. 5D. (B) The Thr Cβ-Cγ region. (C) The Pro/Val Cα-Cβ region. The dashed squares indicate random coil regions, and the arrows indicate expected trends for crosspeaks due to α-helices and β-strands (60). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison between the secondary structure elements formed in rmMBP upon association with lipids or with actin. The black zigzag represents the amphipathic α-helix that forms in the immunodominant epitope (Asn81–Thr92) upon binding lipid vesicles (12,13). The proline-rich segment immediately following (and slightly overlapping) this epitope forms a transient polyproline type II helix (6). The potential regions that might undergo changes in secondary structure upon binding actin are shaded. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 180-191DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.003) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions