Activation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AB Supplementary Figure S1. (A) H1299 cells harboring pGC were transfected with I-SceI-expressing vector. Percentage of GFP + cells was assessed after.
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
MK-8776, a novel Chk1 inhibitor, exhibits an improved radiosensitizing effect compared to UCN-01 by exacerbating radiation-induced aberrant mitosis  Motofumi.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Jan-Philipp Mallm, Karsten Rippe  Cell Reports 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Condensin Is Required for Nonhistone Protein Assembly and Structural Integrity of Vertebrate Mitotic Chromosomes  Damien F. Hudson, Paola Vagnarelli,
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Christopher Bruhn, Zhong-Wei Zhou, Haiyan Ai, Zhao-Qi Wang 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
SYCE2 potentiates the steady-state DNA repair activity without affecting the cell cycle checkpoint. SYCE2 potentiates the steady-state DNA repair activity.
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Mahesh Ramamoorthy, Susan Smith  Cancer Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Activation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin Rebecca C. Burgess, Bharat Burman, Michael J. Kruhlak, Tom Misteli  Cell Reports  Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 1703-1717 (December 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Chromatin Undergoes Rapid Expansion and Compaction after DNA Damage, and Interference with These Chromatin Changes Attenuates DDR Signaling (A) Snapshots of a damaged chromatin region and recruitment of MRE11 at indicated time points. PAGFP-H2A, green; mCherry-tagged MRE11, red. The scale bar represents 3 μm. (B) Average area of damaged chromatin regions in vector control (green line) versus ASH2-overexpressing cells (black line) over time; an undamaged chromatin region is shown in red (no Hoechst sensitization). Error bars depict SD at each point. p values of ASH2 versus control are shown in heatmap below. Red, p < 0.01; orange, p < 0.05; green, not significant. n > 15 regions for each point. (C) Schematic of chromatin-protein-tethering system: 256 copies of the lac operator (lacO) and 96 copies of tet (tetO) flank an I-SceI cut site (I-SceIcs). Lac repressor fusions to either mCherry alone (LacR) or to chromatin proteins bind to the lac operator arrays after transient expression. (D) Maximum intensity projections of LacR- or ASH2-tethered arrays (red) stained for γ-H2AX (green) after DSB induction by CFP-GR-I-SceI. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Values show median integrated intensity of γ-H2AX at arrays ± median absolute deviation. (E) Percentage of LacR- or ASH2-tethered arrays with γ-H2AX or 53BP1 enrichment 20 min after DSB induction. Columns depict mean and error bars, SD. n ≥ 100 for each condition. ∗p < 0.05. (F) Ligation-mediated quantitative PCR detecting the quantity of DSBs in I-SceI-induced cells. Shown is the average ± SD of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. ∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Compacted Chromatin Triggers DDR Signaling (A) Maximum intensity projections of cells transfected with indicated mCherry-LacR constructs (red) stained with anti-γ-H2AX (green) and DAPI (blue). Green arrows indicate arrays enriched in γ-H2AX that are magnified 2× in the inset image. Gray arrows indicate arrays without significant γ-H2AX. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Percentages ± SD of arrays staining positive for γ-H2AX are shown in the top center of each panel. (B) Images of cells as in (A) but stained with anti-53BP1 (green) (C) Quantification of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 colocalization frequency at the arrays. Values represent fold change in averages ± SD from three experiments (n ≥ 300 for each condition). ∗p < 0.05 compared to LacR alone. (D) Images of cells as in (A) but expressing indicated chromatin-expansion factors or facultative heterochromatin proteins fused to the LacR protein. The scale bar represents 5 μm. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DDR Signaling from Arrays Is Not Due to Array Breakage or Replication Defects (A) Quantification of arrays showing positive TUNEL signals. I-SceI-transfected cells and MIS18α arrays provide positive controls for DNA end detection. Values represent averages ± SD from at least three experiments. ∗p < 0.05 compared to LacR alone; n > 200 for each. (B) Southern blot of genomic DNA isolated from indicated tethering conditions, using a probe to the lac array. I-SceI-transfected cells provide positive control for breaks; unrelated lanes from the blot between I-SceI and HP1α omitted for simplicity. (C) Ligation-mediated PCR assay detecting damage within the lac array. I-SceI used as a positive control for breaks. Normalized signal intensity of PCR reactions are depicted by averages ± SD from two independent trials. (D and E) Cells (D) prearrested in G1 by double thymidine block or (E) serum starved prior to transfection with LacR alone- or HP1γ-tethering constructs. Values represent averages ± SD of γ-H2AX or 53BP1 recruitment measured in cyclin A- or Ki67-negative cells, respectively, from two to five independent experiments. n > 150 per condition. ∗p < 0.05 compared to cycling cells. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Activation of Upstream DDR Signaling by Condensed Chromatin (A) Recruitment of MDC1 and NBS1 to condensed arrays, quantified as in Figure 2C. Values represent average fold change ± SD from three independent experiments (n ≥ 200 for each condition). ∗p < 0.05 compared to LacR alone. (B) Maximum intensity projections of phospho-ATM (S1981) immunostaining at LacR, HP1-, or SUV3-9 arrays. Green arrows, arrays enriched in phospho-ATM; gray arrows, no enrichment. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (C) γ-H2AX formation in condensed chromatin following siRNA depletion of ATM and/or ATR, depicted as average fold change to control siRNA (siControl) transfected with mCherry-LacR ± SD from two experiments (n = 40–150); ∗p < 0.05. Knockdown is shown in Figure S4. (D) DNA-PK, ATM, and ATR were inhibited with KU55933 (ATMi), VE-821 (ATRi), or NU7441 (DNA-PKi) after tethering. Average ± SD of γ-H2AX recruitment compared to DMSO-treated cells transfected with LacR from three independent trials. n > 175 per condition; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. (E) Immunoblot analysis of activated DDR factors detected by phospho-specific antibodies. Loading control, lamin A/C. (F and G) Cyclin A staining (F) and FACS cell cycle (G) profiling of cell populations with tethered chromatin factors. Shown is average percentage of cells positive (S/G2, M phases), or negative (G1) for cyclin A staining or as determined by DNA content. (F) Error bars represent SEM. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mitotic Chromosome Condensation Activates Chromatin-Induced DDR (A) γ-H2AX foci quantified by integrated density measurements. Box: quartiles 1–3; whiskers: value range; red bar: median values as follows: 487 (interphase) and 1,317 (mitosis). ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n > 300 foci for each. (B) Mitotic cells were harvested by shake off, and stained for γ-H2AX (red) and either MDC1 or 53BP1 (green). Shown are maximum intensity projections with DAPI overlay (blue). (C) Increased γ-H2AX foci in cells treated with 50 nM CalA for 60 min, fixed, and immunostained for γ-H2AX (red) and DAPI (blue). The scale bar represents 10 μm. (D) Total nuclear intensity of γ-H2AX from cells in indicated treatments. Box and whiskers as in (A). One single outlier (>1.5 times outside the interquartile range) is indicated by a gray dot, and the red bars indicate median values. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. AU, arbitrary units. See also Figure S5. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Persistent Condensation of Chromatin Enhances Upstream Signaling from Ionizing-Radiation-Induced Breaks but Reduces Cell Survival after Damage (A) Immunoblot of phospho-NBS1 in control or SUV3-9-overexpressing cells ± 5 Gy γ irradiation. β-actin shown as a loading control. (B) Quantification of phospho-NBS1 levels, normalized to β-actin. Values represent averages ± SD from three experiments. Unirradiated NBS1 levels are normalized to 1. ∗∗p < 0.01 compared to irradiated control. (C) Western blot of phospho-CHK2 in conditions as in (A). (D) Quantification of phospho-CHK2 as in (B). ∗p < 0.05 compared to irradiated control. (E) Clonogenic survival assays of cells expressing SUV3-9. Surviving colonies were normalized to unirradiated controls. Values represent median ± median average deviation from three experiments. ∗p < 0.05 compared to irradiated control. See also Figure S6. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1703-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions