Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Neurotransmitter Transporters: Structure Meets Function
A Gate in the Selectivity Filter of Potassium Channels
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Thor Seneca Thorsen, Rachel Matt, William I. Weis, Brian K. Kobilka 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Complementary Structural Mass Spectrometry Techniques Reveal Local Dynamics in Functionally Important Regions of a Metastable Serpin  Xiaojing Zheng,
Modeling an In-Register, Parallel “Iowa” Aβ Fibril Structure Using Solid-State NMR Data from Labeled Samples with Rosetta  Nikolaos G. Sgourakis, Wai-Ming.
A View into the Blind Spot: Solution NMR Provides New Insights into Signal Transduction Across the Lipid Bilayer  Matthew E. Call, James J. Chou  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Flexible Architecture of IP3R1 by Cryo-EM
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free MthK Gating Ring: Insights into the Ligand Gating Mechanism of K+ Channels  Sheng Ye, Yang Li, Liping Chen, Youxing.
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
State-Dependent Network Connectivity Determines Gating in a K+ Channel
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Voltage-gated ion channels
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Topological Determinants of Protein Domain Swapping
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Histone H3 by the Survivin Subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  A. Arockia Jeyaprakash,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Structural Basis of Inward Rectification
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
An Efficient Null Model for Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 839-846 (July 2010) Conformational Changes During the Gating of a Potassium Channel Revealed by Structural Mass Spectrometry  Sayan Gupta, Vassiliy N. Bavro, Rhijuta D'Mello, Stephen J. Tucker, Catherine Vénien-Bryan, Mark R. Chance  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 839-846 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2010 18, 839-846DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Radiolytic Labeling Identifies Residues in KirBac3.1 with Increased Modification Rates in the Open State. (A) Experimental scheme. Dilute buffered solution of closed and open KirBac3.1 in TriDM detergent were irradiated with a focused synchrotron X-ray beam for 0–20 ms in a flow set-up for radiolytic labeling of the solvent accessible amino acid side chains. The exposed protein solution was rapidly quenched to stop secondary free radical reactions. The detergent was removed and controlled pepsin digestion was carried out to obtain peptide fragments of 4–10 amino acids. Reverse phase chromatography was used to separate the peptides and ESI-MS and MS/MS carried out to quantify the extent and identify site of modification. (B) Dose response plot. A representative dose response plot for peptide, 120-GML∗GL∗AVAASLI-131 (∗indicates modification identified by MS/MS). The closed and open states of KirBac3.1 were prepared in buffer containing 50 mM Mg2+ and 1 mM EDTA respectively. EDTA is an ⋅OH radical scavenger and reduces the X-ray dose by a factor of ∼2.5 (Figure S3). The observed rate constant kopen is corrected and kopen-corrected is compared with that of kclosed (Table 1). The solvent accessibility of L122 and L124 at the cavity of membrane pore are increased by a factor of ∼31 from close to open state of KirBac3.1. Rates were calculated for all the modified peptides and compared between the closed and open states to obtain information on conformation dynamics. Error bars represent standard deviation between experimental repeats. (C) Mapping the solvent accessibility changes. Modified residues are represented by sticks on the X-ray crystal structure of KirBac3.1 in the closed state (PDB 1XL4). The color codes indicate the changes in rates of modification or solvent accessibility on transition from the closed to open state. Only the residues with >2-fold increase are highlighted. Structure 2010 18, 839-846DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Modified Residues Highlight TM/Pore Domain Involved in KirBac Channel Gating The color codes are the same as for Figure 1C and residues with elemental color scheme (cpk) are not modified but involved in close packing interaction with the modified residues. (A) Conformational changes in TM2 and the pore-helix. For clarity only the TM section of two diagonally opposed monomers are shown. Note the proximity between M94 and G120 (the glycine gating hinge in TM2). (B) Dynamic gating near the selectivity filter. Top-down view of the pore domain. Note the clustering of these modified residues at an intersubunit interface. Residue K101 forms an intersubunit salt bridge with modified residue E76 in the closed state conformation. Structure 2010 18, 839-846DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Modification of Residues at the Membrane Interface and Intracellular Domain The color codes are the same as for Figure 2. (A) A potential gating interface between the TM/pore domain and the cytoplasmic domain. Note the interaction between the modified residues and the G-loop/CD-loop and the slide-helix/N-terminal linker. (B) Location of modified residues in the intracellular domain. Most of the residues identified in this domain show only minor changes in accessibility (shown in blue 2–3-fold changes) and may reflect the fact that the cytoplasmic domains do not undergo as large allosteric changes during channel gating as other domains (e.g., the slide-helix and TM2). Structure 2010 18, 839-846DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Proposed Gating Mechanism for Kir Channels Taken together the modified residues provide a picture of the dynamic motions involved in the transition between the open and closed state and support the proposed existence of three potential gates within the channel. Shown are schematic views of KirBac3.1 in the closed (left) and open (right) states. The regions that show the largest conformational changes during channel gating are circled in the closed state. Structure 2010 18, 839-846DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.04.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions