MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 July 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Synchronization Requirements Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE /870r2 July 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /430 March 2015 TGax MU ad-hoc groupSlide 1 TGax MU ad-hoc March 2015 Agenda Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0331r1 March 2016 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Power Control for Multi-User Transmission in ax Date:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Data Rate Selection for Wake-up Receiver
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Considerations on AP Coordination
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Purpose of MAC calibration test cases
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Simulation Results for Box5
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Comments on Relay Date: Authors: Month Year
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Issues related to OCW management
Considerations on AP Coordination
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Synchronization Requirements
Flexible Group ID Allocation
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
EHT Feature Discussion
UL MU Random Access Analysis
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Block Addressed WUR Frame
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Presentation transcript:

MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Month Year doc: IEEE 802.11-13/xxxxr0 MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: 2015-03-08 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Email Yonggang Fang ZTE yfang@ztetx.com Bo Sun sun.bo1@zte.com.cn Ke Yao ke.yao@zte.com.cn Kaiying Lv lv.kaiying@zte.com.cn Liu Yang yang.liu@zte.com.cn Jiadong Du CATR dujiadong@catr.cn Yonggang Fang, ZTETX

Abstract The contribution [1] analyzed the impact on OFDM system performance due to residual errors of frequency and timing synchronization between AP and multiple STAs for features like UL OFDMA, UL MU MIMO and CSMA enhancement. In order to control OFDM system performance, [1] suggests to define requirements of frequency and timing synchronization. This contribution is to follow up that proposal and recommend to define synchronization requirements in IEEE 802.11 AX specification framework document.

Overview of UL MU Multi-User features have been suggested in SFD [2] in IEEE 802.11 San Antonio meeting. So far some UL MU features [3][4][5] have been discussed in the 802.11 TGax, and recommended in 11ax SFD. Since OFDM system is sensitive to synchronization error, the contribution [1] suggests to define requirements for frequency and timing synchronization error between AP and multiple STAs so as to keep residual error of synchronizations within a given threshold.

Overview of UL MU Straw Poll Results in [1] Do you support to add the requirement about the residual error of frequency synchronization between the carrier frequency of STA and the carrier frequency received from the AP for UL OFDMA and UL MU MIMO? Result: 54/2/64 Do you support to add the requirement about the transmit timing alignment with the symbol boundary of received frame from AP for UL OFDMA and UL MU MIMO? Result: 41/5/75

Proposal - 1 We suggest to add the follow requirements in SFD Requirement of Carrier Frequency Accuracy For 5GHz band, the accuracy of transmit carrier frequency of STA (and AP) shall be within ±N1 ppm (TBD) for UL MU. For the 2.4GHz band, the accuracy of transmit carrier frequency of STA (and AP) shall be within ±N2 ppm (TBD) for UL MU. Motion-1 Do you support to add in SFD the above frequency requirement for UL MU features? Move: Second: Y/N/A:

Proposal - 2 We suggest to add following requirements in SFD Requirement of Carrier Frequency Synchronization For 5GHz band, the carrier frequency synchronization error between the carrier frequency of STA and the carrier frequency of signal received from the AP shall be within ±N3 ppm (TBD) For the 2.4GHz band, the carrier frequency synchronization error between the carrier frequency of STA and the carrier frequency of signal received from the AP shall be within ±N4 ppm (TBD) Motion-2 Do you support to add in SFD the above frequency synchronization requirement for UL MU transmission? Move: Second: Y/N/A:

Proposal - 3 We suggest to add the follow requirements in SFD Timing Synchronization Requirement The symbol timing synchronization between the transmit symbol boundary of STA and the received symbol boundary from the AP shall be aligned within M ns (TBD) for a given CP length. Motion-3 Do you support to add in SFD the above timing requirement for UL MU transmission? Move: Second: Y/N/A:

References IEEE 802.11 11-14-0818-01-00ax-requirements-for-synchronization IEEE 802.11 11-14-1453-02-00ax-spec-framework-proposal IEEE 802.11 11-13-1388-00-0hew-ul-mu-transmission IEEE 802.11 11-09-0852-00-00ac-ul-mu-mimo-for-11ac IEEE 802.11 11-14-0616-00-00ax-CSMA-enhancement-suggestion