Recruitment of the INO80 Complex by H2A Phosphorylation Links ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling with DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Haico van Attikum,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chromatin Signaling to Kinetochores: Transregulation of Dam1 Methylation by Histone H2B Ubiquitination  John A. Latham, Renée J. Chosed, Shanzhi Wang,
Advertisements

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
Hery Ratsima, Diego Serrano, Mirela Pascariu, Damien D’Amours 
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Branden Wolner, Stephen van Komen, Patrick Sung, Craig L. Peterson 
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages e7 (November 2016)
CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint
Interplay between Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and DNA Damage Response Pathways Reveals that Stn1 and Ten1 Are the Key CST Telomere-Cap Components  Eva-Maria.
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Jörg Renkawitz, Claudio A. Lademann, Marian Kalocsay, Stefan Jentsch 
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Proteasome Involvement in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Junko Kanoh, Mahito Sadaie, Takeshi Urano, Fuyuki Ishikawa 
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Recruitment of the INO80 Complex by H2A Phosphorylation Links ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling with DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Haico van Attikum, Olivier Fritsch, Barbara Hohn, Susan M. Gasser  Cell  Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages 777-788 (December 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033

Figure 1 INO80 Mutations Affect Survival but Not Checkpoint Response on MMS (A) Strains deficient for INO80, ARP5, and ARP8 are hypersensitive to DNA damage. Survival of the indicated isogenic yeast strains in the S288C background was determined by plating serial 10-fold dilutions on nonselective medium containing 0.03% methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or 100 mM hydroxyurea (HU). Growth was monitored after 4–5 days at 30°C. (B) Activation of the central checkpoint kinase Rad53 is normal in ino80, arp5, and arp8 cells. A polyclonal antibody against Rad53 detects the kinase and its hyperphosphorylated form (Rad53-P) in whole-cell extracts from wild-type, mec1, ino80, arp5, and arp8 cells treated or not with 0.05% MMS for 2 hr. (C) Venn diagram showing the number of genes whose expression levels were changed significantly in response to MMS treatment (0.1%) in isogenic ino80 and wild-type strains. The overlap represents commonly regulated genes. The table below shows the fold change in expression levels for differentially and commonly regulated genes. Specific genes are listed in Supplemental Table S3 on the Cell website. (D) As (C), but for isogenic arp8 and wild-type strains. (E) Venn diagrams showing the number of genes, known as repair, cell cycle, or DNA processing genes, whose expression was significantly changed (>1.5-fold induced or repressed) in response to MMS treatment in ino80 mutant versus wild-type. The overlap represents commonly regulated genes. Specific genes are mentioned in the text and in Supplemental Tables S2 and S4 on the Cell website. (F) As (E), but for isogenic arp8 and wild-type strains. Genes misregulated in the arp8 mutant are generally a subset of those misregulated in ino80 cells. Specific genes are mentioned in the text and in Supplemental Table S4 and are summarized in Supplemental Table S2 on the Cell website. Cell 2004 119, 777-788DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033)

Figure 2 Mutants Lacking a Functional INO80 Complex Are Hypersensitive to DSB Induction (A) Schematic representation of the features of Chr III in JKM179, a haploid yeast strain that contains a galactose-inducible HO endonuclease integrated at the ADE3 locus. Upon switch to galactose, HO endonuclease is expressed, inducing a DSB at the MAT locus. The HM donor loci HML and HMR were deleted, which prevents repair of the DSB by homologous recombination. Repair can occur through NHEJ until extensive processing prevents cleavage and religation. (B) arp5 mutants are sensitive to the induction of a single chromosomal DSB when the HO endonuclease is expressed from a galactose-inducible promoter. Survival of indicated, isogenic strains in the JKM179 background was determined by the ratio of the numbers of colonies formed on medium containing galactose versus glucose. (C) arp5 and arp8 mutants, like a yku70 mutant, are sensitive to the induction of a single DSB induced by a tetracycline-regulated HO endonuclease. Survival of the indicated strains was determined after plating serial 10-fold dilutions on selective medium with doxycycline (HO off) and without doxycycline (HO on). Cell 2004 119, 777-788DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033)

Figure 3 INO80 Recruitment to a DSB Requires H2A Phosphorylation (A) Schematic representation of the features of Chr III (upper panel) in the haploid yeast strain that expresses the galactose-inducible HO endonuclease and bears deletions for HML and HMR loci. The primer/probe sets at HO1 and HO2 indicated. These amplify different regions near the HO DSB by quantitative real-time PCR in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments. Efficiency of DSB formation at the MAT locus (lower panel). PCR was performed on input DNA from ChIP experiments using primers that span the HO cleavage site and primers that anneal to the SMC2 control locus on Chr VI. Appearance of the DSB is detected by loss of the product generated by the HO primers. PCR products were quantified and the cleavage efficiency calculated as the ratio of HO/SMC signal in induced cells normalized to that of uninduced cells. (B) Ino80 is recruited to a DSB at MAT. Shown is the relative fold enrichment of Ino80 at HO1 and HO2 0, 1, 2, and 4 hr after HO induction as the mean ± SD from multiple independent experiments, calculated as described in the Experimental Procedures. The signal at time 0, just prior to induction, is arbitrarily set as 1 for each condition. (C) Arp5 is recruited to a DSB at MAT. Relative fold enrichment of Arp5 at HO1 and HO2 0, 1, 2, and 4 hr after HO induction is shown. (D) Arp8 is recruited to a DSB at MAT. Relative fold enrichment of Arp8 at HO1 and HO2 0, 1, 2, and 4 hr after DSB induction is shown. (E) Histone H2A at MAT becomes phosphorylated in response to the induction of a DSB. Relative fold enrichment of phosphorylated histone H2A at HO1 0, 0.5, and 2 hr after HO induction is shown. HO2 values were slightly lower (data not shown), consistent with observations of Shroff et al. (2004). (F) Ino80 recruitment to the DSB at MAT requires phosphorylation of histone H2A. Relative fold enrichment at HO1 and HO2 0 and 4 hr after HO induction in the wild-type and hta1/2S129* double mutant are compared. The efficiency of DSB induction in wild-type and the H2A mutants was not completely identical, and therefore, the signal for Ino80 enrichment was normalized to the efficiency of DSB induction. Cell 2004 119, 777-788DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033)

Figure 4 Formation of ssDNA at the DSB Is Reduced in arp8 and hta1/2S129* Mutants (A) Schematic representation of the QAOS (quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA) method used to amplify ssDNA at the HO1 site near the DSB at MAT. At low temperatures the HO1-ss primer recognizes and binds to ssDNA within the HO1 region (1.6 kb away from the DSB), and a round of primer extension without denaturation creates a novel template molecule from the ssDNA template (1). This novel template molecule is quantified by real-time PCR using primers HO1-f and Tag (2). (B) Reduced ssDNA at the DSB in arp8 and hta1/2S129* mutants. The amount of ssDNA formed at the HO1 site 0, 1, 2, and 4 hr after HO induction in wild-type (black bars), arp8 (white bars), and hta1/2S129* (hatched bars) strains was determined by QAOS. The amount of ssDNA is corrected for the efficiency of strand cleavage in wild-type, arp8, and hta1/2S129* strains, respectively. (C) Ino80 recruitment to the DSB at MAT is slightly impaired in an arp8 mutant. Relative fold enrichment at HO1 and HO2 are compared at 0 and 4 hr after HO induction in wild-type and arp8 cells. The signal for Ino80 enrichment was normalized to the efficiency of DSB induction. Cell 2004 119, 777-788DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033)

Figure 5 Model for the Events Leading to the Recruitment of INO80 to a DSB and Its Role in Lesion Processing Schematic proposal for the events leading to the recruitment of INO80 to sites near a DSB, and its role in processing of this lesion. As described in the text, cleaved ends are rapidly bound by yKu and the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex (MRX), which may help recruit the ATM kinase Tel1. H2A Ser129 phosphorylation is achieved by either Tel1 and/or Mec1, creating a recognition site for the Nhp10 subunit of INO80 (Morrison et al., 2004). The INO80 remodeler could then alter histone position facilitating conversion to ssDNA (dashed green line) by either MRX, Exo1, or other enzymes. Alternatively, INO80 itself may contribute to helix unwinding. It is unclear whether INO80 spreads with phosphorylated H2A or remains localized at the break through other protein interactions. Cell 2004 119, 777-788DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033)