Should we be concerned about student attendance or their engagement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for the Work-Study Supervisor
Advertisements

“W HAT ?! Y OU A CTUALLY E XPECT A LL OF U S TO T ALK IN C LASS ?” E NGAGING S TUDENTS IN A L ARGE L ECTURE C LASS M ELANIE S. J ONES D EPARTMENT OF P.
1 Leading Change - Making it Happen!. 2 –“You can make a change and it triggers failure but if you don’t change, failure is inevitable anyway. You are.
Introduction CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Academic Year 2014/15 Attendance Requirements End of Module Assessment & Continuous Assessment Self-Discipline & Learning Attitude Briefing Content.
Financial Management 2BUS0197 Introduction to Module.
Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
PEER ADVICE ON LEARNING (PAL): WHAT’S IN IT FOR ALL OF US? Debbie Witney, Faculty of Business Tatia Batsikadze, Business and Management Spot the PAL leader.
Effective Use of Instructional Time Jane A. Stallings Stephanie L. Knight Texas A&M University.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
How to mark 100 assignments and give feedback in an hour Seb Savory UCL Electronic & Electrical Engineering.
Perspectives of student engagement Learning and Teaching Conference Faculty of Science and Engineering 30th March 2015 Mark Langan (School of Science.
April 2012 Learning and Teaching Lunchtime forum April 2012 Learning and Teaching Lunchtime forum.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Year 13 Tutor Training – Reports Reports for Y13 are issued on 11 th February. This training is about your role in helping to ensure that the process is.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CLT Conference th July 2015 Nudge! A structured programme of support aimed at improving student achievement where average grades are just below.
2015 NACADA International Conference Rayna Tagalicod, M.Ed. Chair, Mānoa Sophomore Experience Academic Advisor, Mānoa Advising Center Don’t Gamble With.
Clerks to Governing Bodies One to One Tuition Overview.
CISB113 Fundamentals of Information Systems Introduction.
Active learning –Students create, answer, discuss and rank questions –High student engagement –Benefits from large class numbers –Minimal instructor intervention.
Enhancing Cohort Identity in Legal Education
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Constructing knowledge using patchwork text assessments with a critical twist (workshop) Dr Alfredo Gaitán Dept of Psychology Thirteenth CRA Annual Residential.
Certificate IV in Project Management Assessment Outline Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Certificate IV in Project Management Assessment Outline Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Students Centered Learning as a Behaviour Change Approach: Practices in Our Institutions of Higher Learning, Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Faisal H.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research ( MRD1423A ) Instructor: Frederick Ansoff Andrea Chisholm.
Current Business Issues Introduction to Module Module Tutor: Nigel Bryant Session1 14th January 2016.
Study Methods in the UK: Highlighting the differences you can expect from Study Abroad Dr Leon Vinokur.
Peer Advice on Learning (PAL): What’s in it for all of us?
Practice learning and assessment for V150 programme
Training for Master Trainers: Learning Engagement & Motivation
Benefits and challenges at The University of Edinburgh IFP
Transitions through higher education:
Learning Performance Achievement
New developments in the UK Higher Education
Engaging students in seminars
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
IMPACTS OF ICT IN EDUCATION
NDLR Symposium 2012 Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School.
NATIONALS IN A NUTSHELL THE GROWTH MINDSET Session
Still Building a Brighter Future for Young People through Sport
Effective educational strategies of resilient schools
Learning Performance Achievement
Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTA) Program
The One-Two-Three Feedback Cycle
Using Coaching Skills to Maximise Student Progress
Staff Feedback Forum 3pm-5pm, 22 March 2017
New State Law goes into effect July 1, 2018 (HB1091)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
There is Life in Black Letter Land Law Yet
Module 5 Engagement Engagement by Design.
Interest-Based Problem Solving
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
The Heart of Student Success
Kat Hearn and Dawn Reilly
Distance students’ preference for type of tutorial participation
How will my Degree be Classified
Tutors: providing feedback Students: using tutor feedback
HEA Development Day Student Engagement.
Dr Gina Pauli Department of Psychology University of Roehampton
Media Project 4 Assessment and Learning
The role of the UK HEI Impact “officer” pre- and post REF….
Managing People In Organisations
Asset-based rather than deficit-based student support
The Impact of Peer Learning on Assessment Literacy and Feedback Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Should we be concerned about student attendance or their engagement Should we be concerned about student attendance or their engagement? . . . (or either??) A pilot for Accounting students: Student engagement via regular summative assessment Gary Stead: Senior Lecturer in Accounting g.stead@shu.ac.uk Glen Cookson: Senior Lecturer in Accounting g.cookson@shu.ac.uk

Learning Objectives Gain insight into; The positive and negative effects of using this approach to improve student engagement The subsequent impact on the students' journey to becoming independent learners

The situation BA Accounting and Finance BA Forensic Accounting 2 x modules (Level 4) Financial Accounting Management Accounting

The challenge So, lets maximise attendance? . . . . Physical attendance felt very low Concerns around professional behaviours Lack of fundamental accounting knowledge at level 5 and in some cases level 6 So, lets maximise attendance? . . . .

Students need to be engaged Our solution Students need to be engaged

Intervention - focus on "Engagement" Decision made to award marks for prior seminar work and submit it IN CLASS FORMATIVE SUMMATIVE Isn't this what we do already?

Intervention - the specifics Financial Accounting assessment profile Prior to intervention 40% Phase Test 60% Exam (Influenced by professional body exemptions)

Intervention - the specifics Financial Accounting assessment profile Post intervention 10% Phase Test (Semester 1) 10% Phase Test (Semester 2) 10% for engagement (Semester 1) 10% for engagement (Semester 2) 60% Exam Phase Test split to allow feedforward 20 x set of engagement questions (1 set for each seminar)

Engagement - what is it? 'Student engagement is concerned with the interaction between the time, effort and other relevant resources invested by both students and their institutions intended to optimise the student experience and enhance the learning outcomes and development of students and the performance, and reputation of the institution.' (Trowler, 2010)

Engagement - Our incarnation "In order to engage in the module and be awarded marks each week you will be required to: Attend the seminar and attempt the tutorial questions BEFORE every seminar and be prepared to discuss and/or present them to your seminar tutor during the seminar".   Attempt: An attempt at a question is not where a perfect answer is achieved. You will be deemed to have attempted your pre seminar work if you have made a valid attempt at answering ALL THE PRE-SEMINAR QUESTIONS and be able to discuss any difficulties/challenges you faced whilst doing so.   

Engagement - Our incarnation What happens if a student fails to make a valid attempt? "There are two outcomes from not engaging: Outcome 1 - Marks still awarded: If you fail to attend your seminar and/or fail to make a valid attempt your module tutor will expect you to contact them, via email, explaining the reasons for non-engagement no later than 24 hours after your seminar. You will also be required to email your attempt to your seminar tutor for review within this 24 hour window. Outcome 2 - Marks not awarded: Should you fail to notify your tutor within 24 hours of your seminar finishing AND fail to email your pre seminar question attempt you will lose your mark for that week".

Engagement - Our incarnation What if a student has a genuine reason for missing consecutive seminars?   "If you feel you are likely to miss more than one seminar in succession we urge you to make contact with your Student Support Officer (SSO)". If regular non-attendance is for a justifiable reason an exception can be made whereby marks can still be awarded via electronic submission ONLY as long as this is BEFORE the seminar".

Findings

Data collected - academic year 2016/17 Prior accountancy experience Post 16 educational background UCAS points Semester 1 and 2 engagement marks Phase test 1 and 2 marks (%)

Focussing on Engagement Engagement one and phase test one b = 4.90 Engagement two and phase test two b = 3.78

Focussing on Engagement So submitting all the engagement marks is associated with an increase in phase test marks of: 49 percent points for phase test one 37.8 percent points for phase test two This equates to an increase of 8.68 percent points for the overall module mark

Was it worth it?

Short group discussion Are we prohibiting the ownership of learning by using regular summative assessment as a tool? Are we encouraging or discouraging independent learning? (Discussions per table followed by 5 minute plenary)

References HEFCE (2008) Tender for a Study into Student Engagement. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What We're Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35:2, 24-32. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children's Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493-525. Trowler, V. (2010). Student Engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf