Formative Evaluation cs3724: HCI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPING A METHODOLOGY FOR MS3305 CW2 Some guidance.
Advertisements

Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
CS305: HCI in SW Development Evaluation (Return to…)
Dialog on - Usability Düsseldorf / PVpage 1 USABILITY Based on a lecture by Raino Vastamäki, Research Director Adage Oy in Kiljava on May 2003.
CS305: HCI in SW Development Continuing Evaluation: Asking Experts Inspections and walkthroughs.
Ch 11 Cognitive Walkthroughs and Heuristic Evaluation Yonglei Tao School of Computing and Info Systems GVSU.
Evaluation (cont.): Heuristic Evaluation Cognitive Walkthrough CS352.
Semester in review. The Final May 7, 6:30pm – 9:45 pm Closed book, ONE PAGE OF NOTES Cumulative Similar format to midterm (probably about 25% longer)
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept. Cal Poly San.
Heuristic Evaluation. Sources for today’s lecture: Professor James Landay: stic-evaluation/heuristic-evaluation.ppt.
1 User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept. Cal Poly San Luis Obispo FJK 2009.
Empirical Methods in Human- Computer Interaction.
Interactive Systems Technical Design
Heuristic Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques  Basis: Observing users can be time- consuming and expensive Try to predict.
Evaluation Through Expert Analysis U U U
Evaluating with experts
Heuristic Evaluation.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Analytical Evaluations 2. Field Studies
1 SKODA-AUTO.CZ prototype evaluation Poznań, 23th of March 2015.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
SBD: Usability Evaluation
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Design Chris North cs3724: HCI. Quiz What are the 3 steps in producing a UI?
Formative Evaluation cs3724: HCI. Problem scenarios summative evaluation Information scenarios claims about current practice analysis of stakeholders,
Chapter 26 Inspections of the UI. Heuristic inspection Recommended before but in lieu of user observations Sort of like an expert evaluation Heuristics.
Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics
Usability Evaluation/LP Usability: how to judge it.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2012 / Semester 1 / week 5 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Level 2 Prepared by: RHR First Prepared on: Nov 23, 2006 Last Modified on: Quality checked by: MOH Copyright 2004 Asia Pacific Institute of Information.
Y ASER G HANAM Heuristic Evaluation. Roadmap Introduction How it works Advantages Shortcomings Conclusion Exercise.
COMPSCI 345 / SOFTENG 350 Review for mid-semester test AProf Beryl Plimmer.
Usability Testing Chris North cs3724: HCI. Presentations karen molye, steve kovalak Vote: UI Hall of Fame/Shame?
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Analytical evaluation Prepared by Dr. Nor Azman Ismail Department of Computer Graphics and Multimedia Faculty of Computer Science & Information System.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
SBD: Usability Evaluation Chris North cs3724: HCI.
Early Design Process Chris North cs3724: HCI. Presentations mohamed hassoun, aaron dalton Vote: UI Hall of Fame/Shame?
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
SBD: Usability Evaluation Chris North CS 3724: HCI.
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
Introduction to Evaluation “Informal” approaches.
Fall 2002CS/PSY Predictive Evaluation (Evaluation Without Users) Gathering data about usability of a design by a specified group of users for a particular.
Ten Usability Heuristics with Example.. Page 2 Heuristic Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is the most popular of the usability inspection methods. Heuristic.
SBD: Analyzing Requirements Chris North cs3724: HCI.
Discount Evaluation User Interface Design. Startup Weekend Wellington CALLING ALL DESIGNERS, DEVELOPERS AND IDEAS FOLK: Startup Weekend returns to Wellington.
Asking Users and Experts Li Zhang (Jacey) Yuewei Zhou (Joanna)
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Chapter 16: User Interface Design
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
CS3205: HCI in SW Development Evaluation (Return to…)
SBD: Usability Evaluation
Introduction to Human Computer Interaction
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Usability and HCI Topics
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
Unit 14 Website Design HND in Computing and Systems Development
Heuristic Evaluation Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design.
Software Engineering D7025E
Evaluation ECE 695 Alexander J. Quinn March 30, 2018.
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
Evaluation.
Nilesen 10 hueristics.
CSM18 Usability Engineering
15. Human-Computer Interaction
COMP444 Human Computer Interaction Evaluation
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Presentation transcript:

Formative Evaluation cs3724: HCI

User Interface Metrics Ease of learning learning time, … Ease of use perf time, error rates… User satisfaction surveys… Not “user friendly”

Scenario-Based Design ANALYZE analysis of stakeholders, field studies claims about current practice Problem scenarios Scenario-Based Design DESIGN Activity scenarios metaphors, information technology, HCI theory, guidelines iterative analysis of usability claims and re-design Information scenarios Interaction scenarios PROTOTYPE & EVALUATE summative evaluation formative evaluation Usability specifications

Usability Engineering Reqs Analysis Design Evaluate Develop

Usability Engineering Reqs Analysis Design Evaluate Develop many iterations

Usability Engineering Formative evaluation Summative evaluation

Claims Analysis + advantages - disadvantages E.g. file management: + fast learning + spatial learning aid memory switching between devices long to locate a known file… + flexible, power + fast for experts Learning commands aesthetics lacking?...

Usability Evaluation Analytic Methods: Empirical Methods: Heuristic Evaluation Models: GOMS, Fitts Law Empirical Methods: Usability Testing Wizard of Oz Controlled Experiment

Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics Visible status, feedback wysiwyg User control, undo, exits wizards Familiar, speak user’s language Acrobat error msg Consistent, standards Word, PPT Recognition over recall web nav, phone menu Efficient, expert shortcuts Word bold Aesthetic, minimalist phone book Prevent errors HomeFinder Error recovery undo, back Help, task-based IIS help doc

Speak the User’s Language

Help documentation Context help, help doc, UI

Applying Heuristics Lets look at a website…

Early Usability Testing Formative: helps guide design Early in design process when architecture is finalized, then its too late! A few users (3-5) Identify usability problems, incidents Qualitative feedback from users Quantitative usability measures

Usability Test Procedure Wizard of Oz: act out the system Benchmark task set No cheating! Don’t teach them how to use the UI Repeat: Give user a task Ask user to “think aloud” Observe, note mistakes and problems Avoid interfering, hint only if completely stuck Interview Verbal feedback Questionnaire 30 min - 1 hour / user

Analyze Results Initial reaction: Mature reaction: “stupid user!”, “that’s developer X’s fault!”, “this sucks” Mature reaction: “how can we redesign UI to solve that usability problem?” the user is always right Identify usability problems Learning issues: e.g. can’t figure out or didn’t notice feature Performance issues: e.g. arduous, tiring to solve tasks Subjective issues: e.g. annoying, ugly Problem severity: critical vs. minor Redesign

In action: Pizza Ordering System Scenario: VT students, studying/busy/tired, poor, wants discounts, starving, credit card / hokie card/ no cash, 2 in together, half-n-half, split cost Volunteers! Design ideas Wizard of Oz usability test Redesign

Pizza R Us Drag your toppings: Whole peperoni Half-n-half mushrooms pineapple checkout PRICE: $10.00

Size of pizza: First half: 2nd half: Toppings: Toppings: Price: 0.00 large Small First half: Toppings: Peperoni Mushrooms Pineapple Price: 0.00 2nd half: Toppings: Peperoni Mushrooms pineapple

% pza –ppm –large -…