Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binding Thermodynamics of Ferredoxin:NADP+ Reductase: Two Different Protein Substrates and One Energetics  Marta Martínez-Júlvez, Milagros Medina, Adrián.
Advertisements

Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Unsteady Motion, Finite Reynolds Numbers, and Wall Effect on Vorticella convallaria Contribute Contraction Force Greater than the Stokes Drag  Sangjin.
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Adam G. Larson, Nariman Naber, Roger Cooke, Edward Pate, Sarah E. Rice 
Iman M Shammat, Sharona E Gordon  Neuron 
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Jefferson D. Knight, Joseph J. Falke  Biophysical Journal 
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
CW and CCW Conformations of the E
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Liqiang Dai, Holger Flechsig, Jin Yu  Biophysical Journal 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Shu-Chun Cheng, Gu-Gang Chang, Chi-Yuan Chou  Biophysical Journal 
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Calmodulin Modulates Initiation but Not Termination of Spontaneous Ca2+ Sparks in Frog Skeletal Muscle  George G. Rodney, Martin F. Schneider  Biophysical.
Janin Glaenzer, Martin F. Peter, Gavin H. Thomas, Gregor Hagelueken 
Modeling Diverse Range of Potassium Channels with Brownian Dynamics
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Ancestral Interactions of Ribosomal RNA and Ribosomal Proteins
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Kinetics of Surface-Driven Self-Assembly and Fatigue-Induced Disassembly of a Virus- Based Nanocoating  Alejandro Valbuena, Mauricio G. Mateu  Biophysical.
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Dirk Gillespie, Le Xu, Gerhard Meissner  Biophysical Journal 
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Rikiya Watanabe, Makoto Genda, Yasuyuki Kato-Yamada, Hiroyuki Noji 
Angular Approach Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Cooperative Nucleotide Binding in Hsp90 and Its Regulation by Aha1
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Stimulatory Action of Internal Protons on Slo1 BK Channels
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1957-1966 (May 2016) A Microfluidic Platform for Real-Time Detection and Quantification of Protein-Ligand Interactions  Therese W. Herling, David J. O’Connell, Mikael C. Bauer, Jonas Persson, Ulrich Weininger, Tuomas P.J. Knowles, Sara Linse  Biophysical Journal  Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1957-1966 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental design. (A) The design of the microfluidic free-flow electrophoresis device used in this study. Integrated metal electrodes are shown in gray. Inlets for the sample and buffer are indicated. Support pillars for the channel ceiling and the pillar array utilized for the electrode integration and alignment are also shown. The sample deflection is measured at the end of the electrophoresis channel (blue shaded area). (B) A pseudo-three-dimensional representation of the device showing a cross section of the main electrophoresis channel. Upon application of an electric potential, the sample is deflected from its path at the center of the channel. The scale bar refers to the vertical dimension. (C) Fluorescence image of 1 μM calmodulin in the buffer containing EDTA at 0 V. (D) Fluorescence image of 1 μM calmodulin in the buffer containing EDTA at an applied potential of 4 V. The negatively charged protein is deflected toward the anode. (E) The structure of calmodulin in the absence of Ca2+ shown as a ribbon diagram (top) and as a surface plot with hydrophobic residues (isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and methionine) in yellow, acidic residues in red, and basic residues in blue (PDB: 1CFD) (22). (F) The structure of calmodulin with four Ca2+ (gray spheres), chelated by the four EF-hands, can be seen in the ribbon diagram (top), whereas the surface representation (bottom) reveals the exposure of two hydrophobic patches upon Ca2+ binding (PDB: 3CLN) (23). Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 1957-1966DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Protein array screen for calmodulin-binding proteins. Fluorescence image of the areas of the protein array containing the immobilized brain isoform for experiments performed in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+ (left) or 1 mM EDTA (right). Every protein is present in duplicate dots. The creatine kinase spots have been highlighted with a red bounding box. The very bright spots to the left of the brain isoform in the presence of Ca2+ are calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1 (Q14012), a known and highly Ca2+-sensitive binding target of calmodulin. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 1957-1966DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Electrophoresis experiments in buffer containing EDTA. (A) Sample deflection is monitored via fluorescence. Fluorescence intensity profiles for the isolated protein: 1 μM calmodulin (CaM) for four repeats of a voltage ramp. The color bar above (A) shows the applied voltage for each profile and applies to (A) and (B). The profiles are recorded for a cross section of the separation channel. (B) Fluorescence intensity profiles for 1 μM labeled calmodulin in the presence of 20 μM unlabeled creatine kinase B (CaM + CKB). (C) The measured sample deflection after passing between the electrodes against the measured current for 1 μM calmodulin and 0–27 μM creatine kinase B. Throughout the figure, data points are colored according to the creatine kinase concentration, going from low (black) to high (red). The color bar applies to (C) and (D). (D) Sample deflection velocity against the electric field across the solution for calmodulin and creatine kinase in the absence of Ca2+. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 1957-1966DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Creatine kinase interaction with calmodulin monitored by free-flow electrophoresis. (A) The electrophoretic mobility of 1 μM calmodulin shown against an increasing creatine kinase B concentration in the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+. The dashed line shows a least-squares fit of Eq. 2 to the data. The diagram at the top shows calmodulin (black), calcium ions as gray spheres, the label as a star, and creatine kinase (lighter color). (B) Electrophoretic mobility of 1 μM calmodulin against increasing creatine kinase B concentration in the presence of 0.1 mM EDTA. (C) The electrophoretic mobility of 1 μM calmodulin against increasing calbindin concentration in buffer containing 0.1 mM Ca2+. The diagram at the top shows calcium-bound calbindin and calmodulin. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 1957-1966DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Further investigation of the calmodulin-creatine kinase interaction. (A) SPR data for 5 μM creatine kinase in buffer containing Ca2+ (dark) or EDTA (light). The association data are shown at left, and the disassociation data are shown at right. The dashed lines represent the fits to determine kon and koff assuming a 1:1 binding event. (B) Michaelis-Menten kinetics of 0.5 μM creatine kinase at 37°C in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM KCl, 100 μM MgCl2, and 100 μM CaCl2 with (black) and without (light) 0.5 μM Ca2+-loaded calmodulin. The concentrations of creatine phosphate and ADP were altered in parallel, and the initial rate is plotted versus either substrate concentration. The black curve shows the best fits of the Michaelis-Menten model to the data in the presence of calmodulin, whereas the lighter colored curve shows a fit that includes a Hill parameter to account for allosteric coupling between subunits of the enzyme. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 1957-1966DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions