The influence of the length of lower-limb prosthesis on spinal kinematics1 Raymond Y Lee, PhD, Alan Turner-Smith, DPhil Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 84, Issue 9, Pages 1357-1362 (September 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4
Fig 1 Change in pelvic positions when the 30-mm wood block was placed under the prosthetic and sound feet. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)
Fig 2 Change in positions of the lumbar spine when the 30-mm wood block was placed under the prosthetic and sound feet. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)
Fig 3 Mean maximum movements of the lumbar spine under the normal condition. The figures provided are the mean values (thick line). Dashed lines are 1 SD on either side of the mean. Abbreviations: P, prosthetic side; S, sound side. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)
Fig 4 Mean maximum movements of the lumbar spine when a 30-mm wood block was placed under the prosthetic foot. The figures provided are the mean values (thick line). Dashed lines are 1 SD on either side of the mean. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)
Fig 5 Mean maximum movements of the lumbar spine when a 30-mm wood block was placed under the sound foot. The figures provided are the mean values (thick line). Dashed lines are 1 SD on either side of the mean. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)
Fig 6 Mean maximum movements of the lumbar spine when subjects stood up from a chair. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1357-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00259-4)