Spokespersons P. Bosted, R. Ent,, E. Kinney and H. Mkrtchyan Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production E12-09-017 Spokespersons P. Bosted, R. Ent,, E. Kinney and H. Mkrtchyan Not much is known about the orbital motion of partons Significant net orbital angular momentum of valence quarks implies significant transverse momentum of quarks Main goal: Map the pT dependence (pT ~ L < 0.5 GeV) of p+ and p- production off proton and deuteron targets to study the kT dependence of (unpolarized) up and down quarks Beam Time Request: 6.5 days at 8.8 GeV 25.5 days at 11.0 GeV Total: 32 days About 2/3 of running time scheduled for 2017 in Hall C

Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production Outline: SIDIS: general remarks and framework Transverse momentum dependence of charged pions - Results from E00-108 & simple model analysis E12-09-017 Kinematics and Projected Results Spin-off relevant for the general SIDIS program Radiative correction modeling: linking to z = 1 Single-spin asymmetries Low-energy (x,z) factorization for charged kaons The upcoming run preparations

Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering Use advantages of multi-hall approach! Hall B: Large acceptance (CLAS12), polarized H and D targets  azimuthal distributions of final-state particles  cross sections, single & double-spin asymmetries  start kaon SIDIS program with RICH detector Hall A: Large acceptance in forward region with SOLID, Polarized 3He target  longitudinal & transversely polarized 3He  pion & kaon run with BigBite and SBS  Access to n structure at high-x and high-Q2 Hall C: Precision magnetic-spectrometer setup, p and K, high luminosity  L/T separations in SIDIS  precision cross sections and ratios of p+ and p- (and K+, K-)

SIDIS – kT Dependence Pt = pt + z kt + O(kt2/Q2) TMDu(x,kT) Final transverse momentum of the detected pion Pt arises from convolution of the struck quark transverse momentum kt with the transverse momentum generated during the fragmentation pt. Pt = pt + z kt + O(kt2/Q2) Linked to framework of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions TMDu(x,kT) f1,g1,f1T ,g1T h1, h1T ,h1L ,h1 p m x TMD

Transverse momentum dependence of SIDIS Linked to framework of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions p m X TMD N q U L T f1 h1 g1 h1 L f1T g1T h1 h1T Unpolarized target Longitudinally pol. target TMDq(x,kT) Transversely pol. target Unpolarized kT-dependent SIDIS: in framework of Anselmino et al. described in terms of convolution of quark distributions q and (one or more) fragmentation functions D, each with own characteristic (Gaussian) width  Emerging new area of study I. Integrated over pT and f Hall C: PRL 98:022001 (2007) Hall B: PRD 80:032004 (2009) II. PT and f dependence Hall B: PRD 80:032004 (2009) Hall C: PL B665 (2008) 20 Hall C: PR C85 (2012) 015202 

SIDIS Formalism General formalism for (e,e’h) coincidence reaction w. polarized beam: [A. Bacchetta et al., JHEP 0702 (2007) 093] (Y = azimuthal angle of e’ around the electron beam axis w.r.t. an arbitrary fixed direction) Use of polarized beams will provide useful azimuthal beam asymmetry measurements (FLU) at low pT complementing CLAS12 data

Transverse momentum dependence of SIDIS General formalism for (e,e’h) coincidence reaction w. polarized beam: [A. Bacchetta et al., JHEP 0702 (2007) 093] (Y = azimuthal angle of e’ around the electron beam axis w.r.t. an arbitrary fixed direction) Azimuthal fh dependence crucial to separate out kinematic effects (Cahn effect) from twist-2 correlations and higher twist effects. data fit on EMC (1987) and Fermilab (1993) data assuming Cahn effect → <m02> = 0.25 GeV2 (assuming m0,u = m0,d)

Transverse momentum dependence of SIDIS Pt dependence very similar for proton and deuterium targets Pt dependence very similar for proton and deuterium targets, but deuterium slopes systematically smaller?

Unpolarized SIDIS – JLab E00-108 data Constrain kT dependence of up and down quarks separately 1) Probe p+ and p- final states 2) Use both proton and neutron (d) targets 3) Combination allows, in principle, separation of quark width from fragmentation widths Example 1st example: Hall C, PL B665 (2008) 20 Numbers are close to expectations! But, simple model only with many assumptions (factorization valid, fragmentation functions do not depend on quark flavor, transverse momentum widths of quark and fragmentation functions are gaussian and can be added in quadrature, sea quarks are negligible, assume Cahn effect, etc.), incomplete cos(f) coverage, uncertainties in exclusive event & diffractive r contributions. <pt2> (favored) <kt2> (up) x = 0.32 z = 0.55 Example

Transverse Momentum Dependence: E00-108 Summary E00-108 results were only suggestive at best: limited kinematic coverage - assumed (PT,f) dependency ~ Cahn effect very simple model assumptions but PT dependence off D seems shallower than H Many limitations could be removed with 12 GeV: wider range in Q2, higher W, Mx improved/full coverage in f (at low pT) larger range in PT wider range in x and z (to separate quark from fragmentation widths) possibility to check various model assumptions Power of (1-z) for D-/D+, quantitative contribution of Cahn term Dup+ = Ddp-, Higher-twist contributions consistency of various kinematics (global fit vs. single-point fits)

Choice of E12-09-017 Kinematics W2 = 5.08 GeV2 and larger (up to 11.38 GeV2) Use SHMS angle down to 5.5 degrees (for p detection) HMS angle down to 10.5 degrees (e- detection) separation HMS-SHMS > 17.5 degrees MX2 = Mp2 + Q2(1/x – 1)(1 – z) > 2.9 GeV2 (up to 7.8 GeV2) Choice to keep Q2/x fixed  qg ~ constant exception are data scanning Q2 at fixed x All kinematics both for p+ (and K+) and p- (and K-), both for LH2 and LD2 (and Al dummy) Choose z > 0.3 (pp > 1.7 GeV) to be able to neglect differences in s(p+N) and s(p-N)

Choice of Kinematics HMS + SHMS Accessible Phase Space for Deep Exclusive Scattering All together: data base of precise SIDIS cross sections over nice range of x and Q2! 11 GeV phase space E12-06-104 Scan in (z,pT) No scan in Q2 at fixed x: RDIS(Q2) known 6 GeV phase space E12-09-017 Scan in (x,z,pT) E00-108 + scan in Q2 at fixed x C12-09-002 + scans in z For semi-inclusive, less Q2 phase space at fixed x due to: i) MX2 > 2.5 GeV2; and ii) need to measure at both sides of Qg

Choice of Kinematics – cont. x Q2 (GeV2) Z Pp (GeV) Qp (deg) I 0.2 2.0 0.3 -0.6 1.7 – 3.3 8.0 – 23.0 II 0.3 3.0 1.7 – 3.4 5.5 – 25.5 III 0.4 4.0 IV 0.5 5.0 1.7 – 3.5 8.0 – 28.0 V 1.8 1.1 – 2.1 8.0 – 30.5 VI 4.5 2.5 – 5.0 5.5 – 20.5 Map of pT dependence in x and z, in Q2 to check (pT/Q) and (pT2/Q2) behavior Kinematics I, II, III, and IV are identical to those where this collaboration also plans to map R (= sL/sT) in SIDIS in E12-06-104. These are the priority for 2017 run.

E12-09-017: PT coverage f = 90o Excellent f coverage Can do meaningful measurements at low pT (down to 0.05 GeV) due to excellent momentum and angle resolutions! f = 90o Excellent f coverage up to pT = 0.2 GeV Sufficient f coverage up to pT = 0.4 GeV (compared to the E00-108 case below, now also good coverage at f ~ 0o) Limited f coverage up to pT = 1 GeV pT = 0.6 pT = 0.4 f = 180o f = 0o E00-108 f = 270o PT ~ 0.5 GeV: use f dependencies measured in CLAS12 experiments (Run group A in particular)

C12-09-017 Projected Results - I III IV II VI I V

Kaon Identification Particle identification in SHMS: 0) TOF at low momentum (~1.5 GeV) Heavy (C4F8O) Gas Cherenkov to select p+ (> 3 GeV) 60 cm of empty space can be used for two aerogel detectors, e.g.: - n = 1.015 to select p+ (> 1 GeV) select K+ (> 3 GeV) - n = 1.055 to select K+ (>1.5 GeV) NSF-MRI grant to Catholic U (lead) U South Carolina Mississippi State Florida Intern. U (+ Yerevan + JLab)

Spin-off: study x-z Factorization for kaons P.J. Mulders, hep-ph/0010199 (EPIC Workshop, MIT, 2000) At large z-values easier to separate current and target fragmentation region  for fast hadrons factorization (Berger Criterion) “works” at lower energies If same arguments as validated for p apply to K: At W = 2.5 GeV: z > 0.6 (but, z < 0.65 limit may not apply for kaons!)

E12-09-017 Projected Results - Kaons III IV II VI I V

Systematic Uncertainties – the z  1 Limit From: G. Huber’s presentation on PR12-06-101 “Measurement of the Charged Pion Form Factor to High Q2” Projected Systematic Uncertainty Source Pt-Pt ε-random t-random ε-uncorrelated common to all t-bins Scale ε-global t-global Spectrometer Acceptance 0.4% 1.0% Target Thickness 0.2% 0.8% Beam Charge - 0.5% HMS+SHMS Tracking 0.1% 1.5% Coincidence Blocking PID Pion Decay Correction 0.03% Pion Absorption Correction MC Model Dependence Radiative Corrections 2.0% Kinematic Offsets Added in quadrature: 1.8%

The beam helicity asymmetry Proportional to sin(f), must go to zero at Pt=0 Interference term (L-T prime) Very sensitive to details of interactions Example: dramatic influence of Roper resonance in exclusive p+ electroproduction Typical asymmetry 0.05: need lots of statistics

Run Preparations Re-optimize run plan taking into account: 2x higher accidental rates than in proposal Data at 4-pass and maybe 3-pass for radiative correction modeling. Also, Need some data at 0.6<z<1 at 5-pass. Difficulties in going to small SHMS angles 5 pass energy of 10.6 GeV

Adding option of measurements w/Carbon Run Preparations Adding option of measurements w/Carbon Plan to add to “dummy” target and Use z-resolution of HMS to distinguish Needed for CLAS12 analysis with polarized ammonia Physics: Propogation of quarks through nuclei

Personael and Collaboration Run Preparations Personael and Collaboration Great opportunity for PhD thesis! Great opportunity for post-docs! And for young faculty members too.