MIRACLES budget: Summary of the 3 configurations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource Sources and Optics for XAS Apurva Mehta.
Advertisements

A.Lagoyannis I.N.P.P. NCSR “Demokritos” Nuclear Physics Applications at the Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics A. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Setup for large area low-fluence irradiations with quasi-monoenergetic 0.1−5 MeV light ions M. Laitinen 1, T. Sajavaara 1, M. Santala 2 and Harry J. Whitlow.
Hardware Progress Doug Abernathy ARCS Instrument Scientist ARCS IDT Meeting Lujan Center, LANL September 30, 2002 SNS Instrument SystemsArgonne/Oak Ridge.
Transfer reactions Resonant Elastic scattering Inelastic scattering: GR.
LCLS Studies of Laser Initiated Dynamics Jorgen Larsson, David Reis, Thomas Tschentscher, and Kelly Gaffney provided LUSI management with preliminary Specifications.
experimental platform
Polarized Beams Using He-3 at the NCNR Triple-Axis Spectrometers Ross Erwin Tom Gentile Wangchun Chen Sarah McKenney.
Progress on the New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer, MACS C. Broholm 1,2, T. D. Pike 1,2, P. K. Hundertmark 1,2, P. C. Brand 2, J. W. Lynn 2,
Conceptual Design: MACS is designed to maximize the efficiency for energy resolved surveys of Q-space in the sub-thermal energy range. Two innovations.
Neutron Diffraction Studies at the IBR2 Reactor Status and Future Geologisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, Albertstr. 23b, Freiburg, Germany.
Fast Timing with Diamond Detectors Lianne Scruton.
HYSPEC HYSPEC INSTRUMENT DESIGN – OUTLINE  The two “models” considered for HYSPEC – inside & outside (Mark)  A breakdown of the components of the two.
Potential Portuguese Contributions to the ESS Project Areas and topics of interest for the ITN Pedro Vaz (ITN) Workshop “Towards a Portuguese Participation.
MACS –a New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST February 17, 2003Timothy D. Pike1 Developing MACS A Third Generation Cold Neutron Spectrometer.
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
5th workshop on scientific collaboration/JINR/Dubna HJL Basis HFR IBR-2 user policy collaboration Project REMUR: Investigation of the structure.
Choosing the Right Neutron Spectrometer Dan Neumann NIST Center for Neutron Research
Building MACS  Goals of the MACS project  Funding and time line  Technical overview  Possible IDG contributions  Process for IDG involvement in MACS.
Recommendations of the Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics 20th meeting, April 2004 Wojciech Nawrocik JINR Scientific Council,
The HYSPEC Polarized Beam Spectrometer Mark Hagen, Barry Winn, Melissa Graves-Brook Neutron Scattering Science Division David Anderson, Xin Tony Tong Neutron.
February 21-21, 2008JINR Scientific Council 103-d session IREN project status.
Polarized Neutrons in ANSTO – From LONGPOL to Pelican, Taipan, Sika, Platypus and Quake Dehong Yu and Shane Kennedy Bragg Institute, ANSTO, Australia.
MACS Concept and Project Status Making best use of CW source MACS-imizing incident flux MACS-imizing detection efficiency From concept to reality Collin.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
The NCNR Spin-Polarized Triple-Axis Spectrometer (SPINS) The SPINS instrument is located at the heart of the cold neutron guide hall of the NIST Center.
MACS –a New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST September 24, 2002Collin L. Broholm Timothy D. Pike 1 Scientific Program and Requirements.
Parameters of the new diffractometer “ARES” Aleksey E. Sokolov PNPI NRC “KI”
Conceptual design and performance of high throughput cold spectrometer : MACS Why MACS Layout and key elements Performance Data collection Scientific program.
Past and Future Insights from Neutron Scattering Collin Broholm * Johns Hopkins University and NIST Center for Neutron Research  Virtues and Limitations.
Neutron Scattering Group February, 2001 A High Performance Instrument for the Single Crystal Spectroscopy at the Pulsed SNS. n What is the spectrometer.
A New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST J. A. Rodriguez 1,3, P. Brand 3, C. Broholm 2,3, J.C. Cook 3, Z. Huang 3, P. Hundertmark 3, J. Lynn.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
1 Photo, dated 2006, courtesy of Arthur Schultz. Flux Increase at Neutron Sources 2 J-PARC.
Presentations for this session Anton – Detector concept and rate estimations Scott – Readout Jonathan – Data Management.
Neutron Scattering Group March, 2001 A High Performance Hybrid Spectrometer for the Single Crystal Spectroscopy at the Pulsed SNS  Scientific case and.
HYSPEC IDT Options for polarization analysis with 3 He for the Hybrid Spectrometer (HYSPEC) L. Passell, V.J. Ghosh, I. Zaliznyak, S. Shapiro, W. Leonhardt,
HYSPEC IDT HYSPEC: Our Instrument at the Spallation Neutron Source. Outline Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the BNL Overview of the SNS instrument.
HYSPEC IDT Polarized Beam Mode for the Hybrid Spectrometer (HYSPEC) at the Spallation Neutron Source. Outline Polarization analysis and the HYSPEC place.
Electrical Engineering for NSS - Status and Planning- Thomas Gahl Electrical Engineering Group Leader February 26, 2014.
ESS TDR Internal Review Chapter and 12. October 2012 Oliver Kirstein.
Phase 1 Design for LOKI at ESS: performance evaluation of suitable detector technologies Or how to build detectors for ESS Kalliopi Kanaki Andrew Jackson.
October, 2001 Hybrid Spectrometer for Single Crystal Studies at the Pulsed SNS: an update. n Principal features of the proposed hybrid spectrometer. n.
International Conference on Science and Technology for FAIR in Europe 2014 APPA Cave Instrumentation for Plasma Physics Vincent Bagnoud, GSI and Helmholtz.
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
Backscattering on Pulsed Sources
Very Cold Moderator Development at LENS
Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation
EBSD system installation and commissioning
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
PSI’s high intensity proton accelerator – an overview Mike Seidel, PSI
The NPDGamma Experiment at the SNS FnPB
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Diagnosis of a High Harmonic Beam Using
Sample environment for Spectroscopy (TEFI, PREMP)
ESS Freia Scope Setting ESS - Lund - 17/10/2016.
Software for Neutron Imaging Analysis
Action List.
Secondary Spectrometer, Motion Control, Infrastructure
Primary Spectrometer & Sample Environment
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
Heavy Ion Laboratory Warsaw University Eryk Piasecki.
Path to BEER upgrades STAP meeting – Phase 2.
Scope Setting Meeting MIRACLES
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Presentation transcript:

MIRACLES budget: Summary of the 3 configurations

+ MANPOWER

Three budget Configurations Configuration 1, within cost category B: 12.9 M€ Configuration 2, world-class scope (competitive): 15.9 M€ Configuration 3, full scope: 17.7 M€

Configuration 1: 12.9 M€ What it has: Primary Spectrometer 30º Secondary Spectrometer (4 panels of Si(111) analyzers / 3He detectors covering 30º) 1 beam monitor (pre-sample) Secondary cave (half cylinder) + shielding

Configuration 1: 12.9 M€ What it does NOT have: Beam monitors to track the neutron beam in the guide Space for upgrade in the tank A competitive Secondary Spectrometer, (narrow Q-range, signal to the detectors) Diffraction detector Radial collimator (no good signal-to-noise ratio)

Configuration 1: 12.9 M€ What it does NOT have: Own sample environment Science case development will depend on availability from SEE pool Sample environment equipment (SEE), recommendations of the STAP report (p. 3): “The STAP recommends that each spectroscopy instrument should have its own cryofurnace as a minimum”.

Configuration 1: 12.9 M€ Low Q  t ~10-100 ns  Diffusion, magnetic scattering (high background) High Q  t ~10-100 ps  Rotation Recommendation from STAP committee (STAP report, p. 2): “We would like to stress that the current budget will result in serious damage to the user program as the instruments will not be able to take full advantage of the ESS source.” MIRACLES

Configuration 2: 15.9 M€ What it has: Primary Spectrometer Secondary cave (full tank) + shielding 120º Secondary Spectrometer (14 panels Si(111) analyzers / 3He detectors covering 120º) 3 beam monitor (pre-sample, transmitted, PWD-PS choppers) Diffraction detector Electronics detectors (to discuss costs) Detectors, the STAP report states: “Spectroscopy detectors: PSD’s are essential on day 1 for good E and Q resolution. Diffraction detectors: due to a relatively small price, it is advised to have them on day 1.”

Configuration 2: 15.9 M€ What it has: Radial collimator Day-one sample environment: Sample holders Cryofurnace (4-600 K) and furnace (<1600ºC) Top-loading cryogen-free CCR (closed-cycle refrigerator): 10-400 K Gas pressure cell and Humidity chamber. + SAD collaboration design + commissioning To improve the signal to noise ratio, the STAP report recommends (p. 7): “As a minimum, a radial collimator should be installed for day 1.”

Configuration 2: 15.9 M€ What it does NOT have: 4 beam monitors tracking the neutron beam in the guide Be filter (background and good signal-to-noise ratio) Frequent user of pool’s sample environment

Configuration 2: 15.9 M€ Upgrade: Beam monitors to track the neutron beam in the guide (space was allocated in advance). Half coverage of analyzers in the Secondary Spectrometer, (120º  150º, parameter that all the pulsed-neutron-source backscattering instruments possess) Be filter (space was allocated in advance) Additional sample environment equipment by sharing costs between other spectroscopy instruments (Minipool) or by collaborations / external grants.

Configuration 2: 15.9 M€ Life sciences: Energy sciences: methyl group & main chain dynamics in proteins Energy sciences: methyl iodide clathrate hydrate Zaccai G, Bagyan I, Combet J, et al. Scientific Reports. 2016, 6, 31434. A. Desmedt et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 12689 (2011).

Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ What it has: Primary Spectrometer 150º Secondary Spectrometer (18 panels Si(111) analyzers / 3He detectors covering 150º) 7 beam monitor (pre-sample, transmitted, 5 in the guide after choppers device to track neutron beam) Diffraction detector Electronics detectors (to discuss costs)

Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ What it has: Radial collimator & Be filter Full suite Day-one sample environment, including: All from Configuration 2, plus Clamped pressure cell In-situ gas adsorption measurements High magnetic field (up to 9 T) through SAD pool Dilution (down to 4 mK) through SAD pool + SAD coolaboration design + commission + continuous user operation

Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ Upgrade: Full coverage with analyzers in the Secondary Spectrometer, (150º Si(111) + 150º Si(311)) Addition of 3He tube arrays for full coverage. Additional sample environment equipment by sharing costs between other spectroscopy instruments (Minipool) or by collaborations / external grants. STAP committee in relation to the secondary spectrometer (p. 7): “The STAP recommends starting with an analyzer crystal coverage of one full side. This will save cost and allow testing the Si(311) upgrade option on the empty side.”

Secondary Spectrometer Angular Coverage [deg] Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ Benchmark angular coverage of secondary spectrometer (+detectors): competitive option  A good starting point! BASIS OSIRIS DNA MIRACLES Facility Pulsed Source Energy Transfer Range ± 200 μeV 15 meV ± 600 μeV Q-range 0.2 Å⁻¹ < Q < 2.0 Å⁻¹ PG002: 0.18-1.8 Å⁻¹ PG004: 0.37 - 3.6 Å⁻¹ 0.08 - 1.98 Å⁻¹ Si(111): 0.2 - 2 Å⁻¹ Dynamic range 0.5 Å PG002: -0.4 -0.4 meV PG004: -3.5 -4 meV 1 - 2.5 Å 1.6Å nBS Bragg Angle 88º 85º 87.5º Collimation Radial Collimator No Radial collimator Filter Be Filter Be filter Secondary Spectrometer Angular Coverage [deg] 150º 137º 156º

Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ Benchmark angular coverage of secondary spectrometer (+detectors): competitive option  Starting point DNA (JPARC) BASIS (SNS)

Configuration 3: 17.7 M€ Matchless flux Excellent sample environment Outstanding signal/noise ratio Very large Q-range Even broader elastic energy resolution coverage

Multiple spectrometers-beamtime-etc… HFBS IRIS AGNES Miyatsu et al, Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2014

Time for (more) discussion Scope setting meeting MIRACLES: outline Time for (more) discussion MIRACLES Closed session (Conference Room Tänkartanken) NSS Closed session (Conference Room Scheele) Discussion Wrap up