Thomas Bowling, Julien Meaud  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Effect of asymmetrical organ of Corti mechanics on the onset-delay of the cochlea Wenxiao Zhou1, and Jong-Hoon Nam1, 2 1Department of Mechanical.
Motor Regulation Results in Distal Forces that Bend Partially Disintegrated Chlamydomonas Axonemes into Circular Arcs  V. Mukundan, P. Sartori, V.F. Geyer,
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Mark Ospeck, Kuni H. Iwasa  Biophysical Journal 
Peng Du, Gregory O'Grady, Leo K. Cheng, Andrew J. Pullan 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Wenjun Zheng, Han Wen, Gary J. Iacobucci, Gabriela K. Popescu 
Underestimated Sensitivity of Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cells Due to Splay between Stereociliary Columns  Jong-Hoon Nam, Anthony W. Peng, Anthony J. Ricci 
Anders Fridberger, Jerker Widengren, Jacques Boutet de Monvel 
Wei Dong, Elizabeth S. Olson  Biophysical Journal 
Sound-Induced Motions of Individual Cochlear Hair Bundles
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
The Generation of Direction Selectivity in the Auditory System
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Waves on Reissner's Membrane: A Mechanism for the Propagation of Otoacoustic Emissions from the Cochlea  Tobias Reichenbach, Aleksandra Stefanovic, Fumiaki.
The Transfer Functions of Cardiac Tissue during Stochastic Pacing
Preceding Inhibition Silences Layer 6 Neurons in Auditory Cortex
David W. Allender, M. Schick  Biophysical Journal 
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Marc Jendrny, Thijs J. Aartsma, Jürgen Köhler  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanisms of Receptor/Coreceptor-Mediated Entry of Enveloped Viruses
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Hirokazu Tanimoto, Masaki Sano  Biophysical Journal 
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Simulation Studies of Protein-Induced Bilayer Deformations, and Lipid-Induced Protein Tilting, on a Mesoscopic Model for Lipid Bilayers with Embedded.
Detection of Cochlear Amplification and Its Activation
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Kathryn Manakova, Huaming Yan, John Lowengrub, Jun Allard 
Adaptive Response of Actin Bundles under Mechanical Stress
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Dylan K. Chan, A.J. Hudspeth  Biophysical Journal 
Power Dissipation in the Subtectorial Space of the Mammalian Cochlea Is Modulated by Inner Hair Cell Stereocilia  Srdjan Prodanovic, Sheryl Gracewski,
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Mouse Otocyst Transuterine Gene Transfer Restores Hearing in Mice With Connexin 30 Deletion-associated Hearing Loss  Toru Miwa, Ryosei Minoda, Momoko.
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Mesoscopic Modeling of Bacterial Flagellar Microhydrodynamics
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
X.-x. Dong, D. Ehrenstein, K.H. Iwasa  Biophysical Journal 
Sripriya Ramamoorthy, Alfred L. Nuttall  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Three-Dimensional Motion of the Organ of Corti
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
R. Gueta, D. Barlam, R.Z. Shneck, I. Rousso  Biophysical Journal 
Julien Meaud, Karl Grosh  Biophysical Journal 
Thomas Bowling, Julien Meaud  Biophysical Journal 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Peng Du, Gregory O'Grady, Leo K. Cheng, Andrew J. Pullan 
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Quantitative Morphology of Epithelial Folds
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Dylan K. Chan, A.J. Hudspeth  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Imaging Electrically Evoked Micromechanical Motion within the Organ of Corti of the Excised Gerbil Cochlea  K. Domenica Karavitaki, David C. Mountain 
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure  Thomas Bowling, Julien Meaud  Biophysical Journal  Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages 747-757 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematics of wave propagation in the cochlea. (A) Here we show response to an acoustic stimulus. Given here are proposed hypotheses for DP propagation as (B) slow reverse wave and (C) fast compression wave. BM, basilar membrane. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Schematic of the cochlear model fluid, structural, and electrical domains. TM, tectorial membrane; RL, reticular lamina; BM, basilar membrane; ST, scala tympani; SV, scala vestibuli; OHC, outer hair cell; MET, mechanoelectrical transduction. Fsomact is the force applied by the OHCs on the RL and BM, and Ubm is the displacement of the BM. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of BM pure tone response for model and experimental data was taken from (43,44). (A and B). Gain of the BM velocity relative to the stapes velocity. The model gain was normalized by the gain predicted by the model at low SPL at CF (55 dB in A and 60 dB in B); the experimental gain was normalized by the gain seen at CF in the low SPL experiments (53 dB in A and 49 dB in C). (C and D) Phase of the BM velocity relative to the stapes velocity. (A and C) Experimental data from (44) is given. (B and D) Experimental data from (43) is given. (A and C) Results for 30- and 90 dB SPL and 50- and 90 dB SPL stimuli, respectively. (B and D) Results for 30- and 100 dB SPL stimuli. The vertical black dashed lines denote CF. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A–D) BM velocity of the DP and primaries as a function of longitudinal position for primary frequency ratios, f2/f1, of 1.05 and 1.35, f2 = 24 kHz, and primary stimuli levels of 80 dB SPL. The vertical dashed lines from left to right indicate the f2, f1, and fDP best places, respectively. The red shading indicates when the phase has a positive slope and the cyan shading indicates when the phase has a negative slope. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (A and B) Box models are given with planes indicating where the pressure is shown in (C–F) and (G–I), respectively. Total and antisymmetric pressure component magnitudes for pure-tone (C and D) and two-tone stimuli are given (E and F). Cross sections of pressure magnitude at several positions are given (G–I). The pure-tone stimuli (C and D) was at 16 kHz and 40 dB SPL and the two-tone stimuli (E–I) has 2f1 – f2 = 16 kHz, primary frequency ratio f2/f1 = 1.20, and primary stimulus level of 80 dB SPL. The horizontal black line represents the cochlear partition. The vertical dashed line in (C), (D), and (F) denotes the 16 kHz best place. The arrows and vertical dashed lines on (E) from left to right denote the positions shown in (G–I), respectively. The three positions shown in (G–I) are an arbitrarily chosen basal position, xb = 0.08 cm; the f2 best place (x2 = 0.26 cm); and the DP best place (xDP = 0.37 cm), respectively. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Shown here is the magnitude (A and B) and phase (C and D) of the ratio of the DP pressure in the ST, 10 μm from the BM, to the DP pressure in the SV next to the stapes (halfway between the BM and the top of the SV) as a function of f2. (A and C) Model results are given. (B and D) Measurements from (33) are shown. All results are at the 20-kHz best place. Model and experimental DPs had primary stimuli levels of 80 dB SPL. For reference, the response to a pure tone with a 40 dB SPL stimulus is also shown. The vertical dashed lines indicate f2 when fDP (or f for the pure tone) corresponds to the CF of 20 kHz. Vertical arrows mark the transition from reverse to forward waves. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Given here is decomposition of the DP pressure for equilevel primaries of 80 dB SPL with f2/f1 = 1.20 and f2 = 24 kHz. (A and B) Magnitude and phase of the total pressure, PT; symmetric pressure, Ps; antisymmetric pressure Pas; forward wave component of the antisymmetric pressure, Pasf; and reverse wave component of the antisymmetric pressure, Pasr are all taken directly above the BM in the SV. (C–E) Magnitude of the antisymmetric pressure (C), reverse wave component of antisymmetric pressure (D), and forward wave component of antisymmetric pressure (E) are shown. The vertical dashed lines indicate, from left to right, the f2, f1, and fDP best places. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Schematics of DP propagation. The figure from (13) was redrawn and extended to include the fast wave, the long wavelength region, and the short wavelength wave region. Note that (D) is the distortion source; (BP) is the DP best place, xDP; and (x2) is the f2 best place. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 747-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions