Joint analysis of historic leveling data and permanent GPS observations for subsidence determination over the Netherlands R. Grebenitcharsky, R. Hanssen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Modelling of Dust Events for DODO and the Development of a New Dust Scheme in the UM Duncan Ackerley Ellie Highwood Mark Harrison Claire McConnell.
Advertisements

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS FITTING METHODS AND SMOOTH PIECEWISE ALGEBRAIC APPROXIMATION AS APPLIED TO DETERMINE POSTGLACIAL TILT IN THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES Azadeh.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
© red ©
T T18-05 Trend Adjusted Exponential Smoothing Forecast Purpose Allows the analyst to create and analyze the "Trend Adjusted Exponential Smoothing"
Assessment of OIB 2009 Data over Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers K. Jezek OIB Science Team Meeting.
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Comparative analysis of climatic variability characteristics of the Svalbard archipelago and the North European region based on meteorological stations.
Background to >10 years of BIFROST activities Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck 1, Rüdiger Haas 1, Sten Bergstrand 1 Martin Lidberg 1,2, Lotti Jivall.
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,
A More Accurate and Powerful Tool for Managing Groundwater Resources and Predicting Land Subsidence: an application to Las Vegas Valley Zhang, Meijing.
Disputable non-DC components of several strong earthquakes Petra Adamová Jan Šílený.
CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Variance One-way ANOVA
How Errors Propagate Error in a Series Errors in a Sum Error in Redundant Measurement.
Original objective = quantify intraplate deformation –Pros: Larger number of sites High density of sites in some areas Minimal cost… –Cons: Density varies.
Slow Slip Events v. Earthquakes Using geodetic data to estimate source parameters.
Technical Specifications for Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project K. Lakakis, P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
Herbicides in Metro Atlanta Streams and Rivers Data Analysis Cristal Moon.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AN INTRODUCTION TO
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
1 Rosalia Daví 1 Václav Vavryčuk 2 Elli-Maria Charalampidou 2 Grzegorz Kwiatek 1 Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha 2 GFZ German Research.
Lessons from the Math Zone: TITLE Click to Start Lesson.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
Determination of the Mean Dynamic Topography at the Coast using the Geodetic and Ocean Approaches and Consequences for Worldwide Height System Unification.
Global predictors of regression fidelity A single number to characterize the overall quality of the surrogate. Equivalence measures –Coefficient of multiple.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of leveling data (red open squares) and the InSAR time series (blue dots).
Global predictors of regression fidelity A single number to characterize the overall quality of the surrogate. Equivalence measures –Coefficient of multiple.
Chapter 4 Demand Estimation
Vectors.
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
Signal and Image Processing Lab
Vertical Land Movements in the Canary Island using Continuous GPS Time Series Analysis: First Results García-Cañada, Laura(1), Teferle, F. Norman(2),
Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.
Impact of the Antenna Model Change on IGS Products
Spatial Modes of Salinity and Temperature Comparison with PDO index
The Chi-Squared Test Learning outcomes
Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation
Argo Delayed-Mode Salinity Data
module Using DInSAR to assess vertical ground motions at Tide Gauges
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Motion with Constant Acceleration
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geological Survey of Estonia
FOMI Satellite Geodetic Observatory
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Low Dimensionality in Gene Expression Data Enables the Accurate Extraction of Transcriptional Programs from Shallow Sequencing  Graham Heimberg, Rajat.
Chapter 4 Demand Estimation
Components of the yield trend.
Let’s work through a visualization of how velocities from three PBO GPS stations can be used to determine the local rate of infinitesimal strain.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling.
Crustal Deformation Analysis from Permanent GPS Networks
Comparison of N. gonorrhoeae gene expression during infection in men and women in vivo. Comparison of N. gonorrhoeae gene expression during infection in.
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks
California Geodetic Advisor,
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks
GPS: GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM Satellites transmit radio signals Receivers on ground record signals and find their position from the time the signals arrive.
Models of the Earth Earth Science Chapter 3.
“Hey, Is This Thing Moving?”
Maps and Grid Reference
Fig. 2 Average 3D velocity field across the SFBA from 13 July 2007 to 17 October Average 3D velocity field across the SFBA from 13 July 2007 to 17.
Fig. 2 Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL. Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL.
Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.
Presentation transcript:

Joint analysis of historic leveling data and permanent GPS observations for subsidence determination over the Netherlands R. Grebenitcharsky, R. Hanssen and P. Ditmar [R.Grebenitcharsky@tudelft.nl,R.F.Hanssen@tudelft.nl, P.Ditmar@tudelft.nl], DESCRIPTION: A joint analysis of historic leveling data together with permanent GPS vertical observations is conducted. Conclusions are drawn about the absolute and relative vertical movements over the Netherlands. This analysis is used to formulate a joint model for subsidence determination using leveling, GPS permanent observations and InSAR. PERMANENT GPS DATA DATA: Time series of ellipsoidal heights for 13 permanent GPS stations in the Netherlands and neighbor countries are used. We use time series from global solutions for stations KOSG, WSRT and BRUS and time series for all local baselines w.r.t. KOSG from weekly EUREF solutions. EFFECT OF PERIODICS ON VERTICAL RATE RESULTS: For local time series a wavelet decomposition up to 12 level is applied. It allows to investigate and remove the effect of periodics less than 39 years and to estimate the remaining trend. The final vertical rate estimations for the EUREF stations is the sum of the global vertical rate for KOSG and the relative rates w.r.t. KOSG. COMPARISON BETWEEN RATES GPS AND LEVELING UNITS:[CM/CENTURY] * Background counters by TNO – National Geological Survey Agreement between the rates due to periodics larger than 39 years and trend and the rates determined by leveling (TNO – National Geological Survey) is observed. HISTORICAL LEVELING DATA DATA: Four leveling campaigns between first order bench marks all over the Netherlands are used (1930s, 1950s, 1970s, 1990s). RELATIVE VERTICAL VELOCITIES (from west to east) RESULTS: The relative vertical velocities between bench marks are determined. Areas with significant relative rates (pink boxes) are shown. One relatively stable area (blue box) in the south-east and a large area in the south-west with significant relative vertical velocities exist. RELATIVE VERTICAL VELOCITIES AND ACTIVE QUATERNARY FAULTS ( * after Worum et al., 2005, Quat. Sc. Rev. # 24) In the stable area significant relative velocities can be associated with existing faults A NEW STEPWISE LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT APPROACH Absolute velocity estimations from relative velocities from leveling & InSAR and relative & absolute velocities from GPS allows a better representation of vertical rates. Vertical changes of WSRT w.r.t. KOSG RAW DATA (green), PERIODIC COMPONENTS (blue), UNITS [MM] approximation level vertical rate -0.07mm/year 1th level vertical rate -0.00mm/year 2th level vertical rate 0.00mm/year 3th level vertical rate -0.01mm/year 4th level vertical rate 0.01mm/year 5th level vertical rate 0.09mm/year 6th level vertical rate -0.16mm/year 7th level vertical rate -0.45mm/year 8th level vertical rate -0.11mm/year 9th level vertical rate -0.53mm/year 10th level vertical rate 0.03mm/year 11th level vertical rate -0.07mm/year 12th level vertical rate -0.06mm/year 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 APPROXIMATED TREND (red) : -0.19mm/year TREND FROM RAW DATA (black) : -1.31mm/year mm/y + Relative velocities from leveling plus their variance- covariance estimations Relative& absolute velocities from GPS Relative vertical velocities from InSAR Surface displacements GPS Leveling Difference KOSG -0.60 -0.90 -0.30 WSRT -2.50 -2.00 +0.50 BORK -12.30 -5.10 +7.20 TERS -8.90 -10.50 -1.60 DELF -9.20 -7.20 2.00 EIJS +3.30 +7.00 3.70