The Effects of Pressure Release, Phonophoresis of Hydrocortisone, and Ultrasound on Upper Trapezius Latent Myofascial Trigger Point Javad Sarrafzadeh, PhD, PT, Amir Ahmadi, PhD, PT, Marziyeh Yassin, MSc, PT Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 72-77 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001 Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Measurement of active cervical range of motion using a dual inclinometer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 72-77DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Mean values for pain in 6 sessions for 3 treatments and a control group. Repeated ANOVA indicated significant differences between the 3 treatment groups and the control group (P<.001). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 72-77DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Mean PPT values in 6 sessions for 3 treatments and a control group. Repeated ANOVA indicated significant differences between the 3 treatment groups and the control group (P<.001). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 72-77DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Mean ILF values in 6 sessions for 3 treatments and a control group. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 72-77DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 5 Mean CLF values in 6 sessions for 3 treatments and a control group. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 72-77DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.001) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions