Determination of Eligibility 3/21/18

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA THIRD STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATIONAL MEETING October 7, 2008.
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
Evaluation Arguments X Is (Is Not) a Good Y. Overview n Criteria-Match Structure n Problem of Standards.
URBAN CHARACTER ANALYSIS. Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban area Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban.
Historic Districts in Virginia Department of Historic Resources Richmond, Virginia June 2014.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Federal Incentives for Preservation.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey = process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. Field survey= the.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Welcome. DBE Outreach for the On-Call Cultural Resource Contract Caltrans D5 July 21, 2015.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey means a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. It includes.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.
Planning and Community Development Department Grove Manor Apartments S. Orange Grove Boulevard Application for Landmark Designation City Council.
Former Flower Shop / Bakery Building Block 45 Lot 3.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT STRATEGY Lund Consulting, Inc. Community Outreach Spring 2015 City of Seattle.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
Planning Department 897 Summit Avenue Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark City Council October 15, 2012.
Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
West Linn Historic Resources and Architectural Styles Overview March 17, 2015.
Historic Landmark Request City Council Location.
The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.
Planning & Community Development Department 817 South Madison Avenue Application for Landmark Designation City Council Meeting January 12, 2015.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Denial LU HDZ – 2327.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies Documentation and Designation of Properties (Chapter 5)
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
Historic Districts Chapter 8 ARCH A Historic District is: – A geographically definable area—urban or rural, large or small—possessing a significant.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
City Council September 25, 2017
Proposed Thorndike-Madrillo Landmark District Public Hearing
Proposed Rose Villa-Oakdale Landmark District Public Hearing
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
ZTA Historic Inns and Restaurants (Clifton)
Application for Landmark Designation S
Preservation of Historically Significant Buildings
Determination of Eligibility 5/4/16
Evaluation Real Archaeology.
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
1211 Wellington Avenue Application for Landmark Designation
Proposed Magnolia Landmark District Public Hearing
Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark
Proposed South Grand-Covington Place Landmark District Public Hearing
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
1600 San Pasqual Street Application for Landmark Designation
2480 Oswego Street Application for Landmark Designation
Application for Landmark Designation North Los Robles Avenue Applicant/Owner: Dominick & Nany Cardella City Council June 5, 2017.
City Council Meeting November 5, 2018
Determination of Eligibility 6/21/17
City Council Meeting November 5, 2018
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Rochelle downtown Historic District
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
National Historic Preservation Act
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Decisions for a Local Historic District
The Statement of Significance: Format and Content
The Statement of Significance (SoS)
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Overlay Zone Spokane Historic Landmarks Commission Final Public Hearing August 28, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Determination of Eligibility 3/21/18 Riegel Brothers Dodge – 1309 W 1st (1920 below)

Determination of Eligibility Reigel bros Dodge – 1309 W 1st At the request of the owner, the SHLC will: Hearing Purpose: Per 17D.040.230, SHLC Determines Eligibility Standards Used: Per 17D.040.230, National Register – 36 CFR 60 Outcome: Eligible or Ineligible for Spokane/National Register

Downtown boundary area 17D.040.230 Subject property

1309 W 1st Avenue

To Be Eligible Under 36 CFR 60 a Property Must: Meet basic guidelines for age and resource category Be associated with an important historic context Retain historic integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance. Source: National Register Bulletin 15: How To Apply The National Register Criteria for Evaluation

Resource and Age Category Eligible Resource Category: “A property must be classified as a district, site, building, structure or object” The property qualifies as a “Building” Eligible Age: “Ordinarily…properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register.” Source: National Register Bulletin 15: How To Apply The National Register Criteria for Evaluation

Determination of Eligibility Reigel bros Dodge – 1309 W 1st

Age Criteria The property at 1309 W 1st was built in 1913 and meets the 50 year age criteria.

1309 W 1st Avenue

1309 W 1st avenue 1910 to 1950 Sanborn Map:

1309 W 1st 2007: 1938:

1309 W 1st Avenue 1952:

1309 W 1st Avenue Wall separating the two buildings:

1309 W 1st Avenue Roof structures:

Eligibility: Criterion A or B A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past (NPS Bulletin 15). A - The building at 1309 W 1st Avenue lacks sufficient integrity to be listed under Criterion A for its association with the automotive context set up in the West Downtown Historic Transportation District B – The building is not associated with a significant person in Spokane’s history, thus not eligible under B

Eligibility – criteria C Integrity The building at 1309 W 1st has lost several of the seven aspects of integrity: Location Design Setting Materials Workmanship Feeling Association

Character Defining Features Loss of parapet which was a match to the other side of the “L” shaped building on Adams Window configuration changed from two display windows with transoms to three bays with brick piers Main entry relocated to the west New doors “Ultimately, the question of integrity is answered by whether or not the property retains the identity for which it is significant.” (NR Bulletin 15)

NPS Bulletin 15 “Properties eligible under Criteria A, B, and C must not only retain their essential physical features, but the features must be visible enough to convey their significance.” The property at 1309 W 1st no longer retains its essential physical features

Summary Property is an Eligible Resource Category? Yes Property is an Eligible Age? Fit Within a Historic Context? Integrity? No

Staff Recommendation The building at 1309 W 1st Avenue is not eligible for listing on the Spokane and/or National Register based on the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (36 CFR 60 or Spokane Register Criteria). The property has lost nearly all of its integrity and no longer conveys five of the seven aspects of integrity: design, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association.