The Molecular Basis of Sugar Sensing in Drosophila Larvae

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drosophila Standard Brain
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
The Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Larva
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Pinky Kain, Anupama Dahanukar  Neuron 
Independent, Reciprocal Neuromodulatory Control of Sweet and Bitter Taste Sensitivity during Starvation in Drosophila  Hidehiko K. Inagaki, Ketaki M.
Laura Boulan, David Martín, Marco Milán  Current Biology 
Associative Learning: The Instructive Function of Biogenic Amines
Sokol V. Todi, Josef D. Franke, Daniel P. Kiehart, Daniel F. Eberl 
Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila  Tzumin Lee, Simone Marticke, Carl.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
translin Is Required for Metabolic Regulation of Sleep
Ilaria Drago, Ronald L. Davis  Cell Reports 
Starvation-Induced Depotentiation of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Nutrient sensors Current Biology
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (January 2017)
Opposing Dopaminergic and GABAergic Neurons Control the Duration and Persistence of Copulation in Drosophila  Michael A. Crickmore, Leslie B. Vosshall 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
The Basis of Food Texture Sensation in Drosophila
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Takashi Murayama, Jun Takayama, Mayuki Fujiwara, Ichiro N. Maruyama 
Volume 24, Issue 17, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
A PDF/NPF Neuropeptide Signaling Circuitry of Male Drosophila melanogaster Controls Rival-Induced Prolonged Mating  Woo Jae Kim, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung.
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Neural Circuitry that Governs Drosophila Male Courtship Behavior
Calcium Taste Avoidance in Drosophila
A PDF/NPF Neuropeptide Signaling Circuitry of Male Drosophila melanogaster Controls Rival-Induced Prolonged Mating  Woo Jae Kim, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung.
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Abhishek Chatterjee, Shintaro Tanoue, Jerry H. Houl, Paul E. Hardin 
Taste Representations in the Drosophila Brain
A Taste Receptor Required for the Caffeine Response In Vivo
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Tetsuya Miyamoto, Jesse Slone, Xiangyu Song, Hubert Amrein  Cell 
Allan M Wong, Jing W Wang, Richard Axel  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Clock and cycle Limit Starvation-Induced Sleep Loss in Drosophila
VRILLE Controls PDF Neuropeptide Accumulation and Arborization Rhythms in Small Ventrolateral Neurons to Drive Rhythmic Behavior in Drosophila  Kushan.
Bonnie Chu, Vincent Chui, Kevin Mann, Michael D. Gordon 
Extinction Antagonizes Olfactory Memory at the Subcellular Level
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Single Serotonergic Neurons that Modulate Aggression in Drosophila
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Martin Häsemeyer, Nilay Yapici, Ulrike Heberlein, Barry J. Dickson 
Volume 25, Issue 22, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e3 (August 2017)
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
The Influence of Light on Temperature Preference in Drosophila
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Mechanism of Acetic Acid Gustatory Repulsion in Drosophila
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Shamik DasGupta, Scott Waddell  Current Biology 
Jia Huang, Weiwei Liu, Yi-xiang Qi, Junjie Luo, Craig Montell 
The mushroom body Current Biology
Neural Circuitry that Evokes Escape Behavior upon Activation of Nociceptive Sensory Neurons in Drosophila Larvae  Jiro Yoshino, Rei K. Morikawa, Eri Hasegawa,
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (October 2004)
Presentation transcript:

The Molecular Basis of Sugar Sensing in Drosophila Larvae Dushyant Mishra, Tetsuya Miyamoto, Yohannes H. Rezenom, Alex Broussard, Ahmet Yavuz, Jesse Slone, David H. Russell, Hubert Amrein  Current Biology  Volume 23, Issue 15, Pages 1466-1471 (August 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.028 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 GR43a Is Expressed in the Larval Taste Organs, as well as the Brain and the Gastrointestinal System (A) Diagram of larval taste organs, adapted from Stocker [18]: structures associated with taste sensing and processing are shown in gray. The cell bodies of the taste neurons are arrayed in ganglia and extend dendrites into the taste organ and axons into the subesophageal ganglion. Olfactory structures are shown in blue. Note that only three brain structures—subesophageal ganglion, the antennal lobe, and the mushroom bodies—are specifically indicated. The pharynx is shown in green. Abbreviations: AL, antennal lobe; BR, brain; MB, mushroom bodies; SOG, subesophageal ganglion; DO/TO/VO, dorsal/terminal/ventral organ; DPS/VPS/PPS, dorsal/ventral/posterior pharyngeal sense organ. (B) Overall view of Gr43a expression in larvae. Gr43aGAL4 drives UAS-mCD8GFP expression in neurons located in chemosensory organs, the DPS/VPS and the PPS, and the proventricular ganglion. The live expression of mCD8GFP is at the left, the phase-contrast image at the center, the overlaid image is at the right. (C and D) Expression analyses of Gr43aGAL4 UAS-mCD8RFP (red) and Gr66a-GFP-IRES-GFP-IRES-GFP (green) in chemosensory organs (C) and their projections to the SOG (D). Gr43a is expressed only in the DPS/VPS neurons, but it is not expressed in the same neurons as Gr66a. Note that Gr66a is also expressed in neurons of the TO ganglion besides of the DPS/VPS neurons. Asterisks indicate DO and TO. (E) Gr43aGAL4 drives mCD8GFP expression in the CNS. The images on the right are an enlargement view of the dorsal protocerebrum. Gr43aGAL4 is expressed in one or two big neurons per hemisphere and in many Kenyon cells. Gr43aGAL4-expressing neurons are also located in the VNC. Neuropil was counterstained with nc82. Current Biology 2013 23, 1466-1471DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Gr43a Is Required for Fast and Slow Preference to Fructose and Nonfructose-Containing Sugars Time-dependent taste preference of w1118 (Gr43a+), w; Gr43aGAL4/GAL4(Gr43a−), w R1 Gr5aLexA; R2/R2; Gr61a−ΔGr64/Gr61a− ΔGr64 (sugar Gr−); and w; Gr43aGal4/Gal4;UAS-Gr43a/+ (Gr43a rescue) to 100 mM sugars with and without a fructose moiety. (A) Gr43a was necessary for both the immediate and late preference response to fructose and the late preference for glucose; 12 ≤ n ≤ 30, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare samples to Gr43a−; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. Negative values for fructose at 2′ and 4′ and melezitose at 4′ (see B) by Gr43a mutant larvae (one-sample sign test, p < 0.05) probably reflect avoidance of high osmolarity in the absence of any sugar taste capability. (B) Response to melezitose and sorbitol recapitulate the response to fructose and glucose, both in Gr43a mutant and control larvae, implying a fructose moiety to be necessary for the immediate but not the late preference; 6 ≤ n ≤ 12, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare to Gr43a−; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. (C) Larval preference for agar containing 0.5% casein peptone (mixture of amino acids and peptides) and 50 mM NaCl is not affected by the Gr43aGAL4 mutation. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare genotypes to w1118 (Gr43a+); 18 ≤ n ≤ 27 for casein peptone, 12 ≤ n ≤ 18 NaCl; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. All data are presented as mean and error bars as ±SEM. Current Biology 2013 23, 1466-1471DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gr43aGAL4 Brain Neurons Are Sufficient for Sugar Sensing (A) Gr43aGAL4 expression was repressed by Cha7.4kb-Gal80 in taste neurons DPS/VPS/PPS and neurons in the gastrointestinal tract but not in the brain neurons. Image of the taste organs and quantification data were obtained from live GFP microscopy, and image of the brain was from immunostained preparations of third-instar larvae using anti-GFP antibody. Genotypes were the following: w; Gr43aGAL4;UAS-mCD8GFP (control) and w; Gr43aGal4;UAS-mCD8GFP/Cha7.4kb-Gal80. Number of GFP-expressing cells in taste organs and proventriculus was determined using live GFP microscopy. Weak expression in at most one proventricular neuron was observed in ∼40% of larvae. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare genotypes. (B) The slow response (16 min) to glucose and sorbitol was rescued in Gr43a mutant larvae in which Gr43a function was restricted to the brain. Immediate, but not slow, response to fructose was reduced in these larvae. Genotypes were the following: w; Gr43aGAL4/GAL4; Cha7.4kb-Gal80/+ (Gr43a mutant control), w; Gr43aGal4/Gal4;UAS-Gr43a/+ (Gr43a rescue), and w; Gr43aGal4/Gal4;UAS-Gr43a/Cha7.4kb-Gal80 (Gr43a “brain only”). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare genotypes to w; Gr43aGal4/Gal4;UAS-Gr43a/+; 12 ≤ n ≤ 18; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. ns, no statistical difference between Gr43a rescue and Gr43a “brain only” groups. (C) Larvae in which the brain neurons were inactivated by expression of TNT showed an immediate response to fructose (2 min), but their late response (16 min) to glucose or sorbitol was completely abolished. Genotypes were the following: w; Gr43aGAL4/+; Cha7.4kb-Gal80/+ (Cha-GAL80 control), w; UAS-TNT/+ (UAS-TNT control), w; Gr43aGal4/UAS-TNT (all Gr43a neurons inactivated), and w; Gr43aGAL4/UAS-TNT; Cha7.4kb-Gal80/+ (only brain Gr43a neurons inactivated). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare genotypes to controls. Note that significance at 4′ time point in sorbitol versus agar was attained only when compared to Cha-GAL80 control; 6 ≤ n ≤ 12; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. ns, no statistical difference between control groups and “only brain Gr43a neurons inactivated” group. All data are presented as mean and error bars as ±SEM. Current Biology 2013 23, 1466-1471DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Concentration of Hemolymph Sugars after Glucose, Sorbitol, or Fructose Feeding Larvae from the w1118 strain were fed on agarose containing 100 mM of each sugar and compared to larvae kept on plain agarose. The amount of each sugar (in μg) was normalized to larval weight (in mg). Data are presented as mean and error bars as ±SEM. Student’s t test was used to compare sugar fed groups to agar fed group; 4 ≤ n ≤ 8 for all groups; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. Current Biology 2013 23, 1466-1471DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions