Katherine Launer-Felty, C. Jason Wong, James L. Cole 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cap-Binding Translation Initiation Factor, eIF4E, Binds a Pseudoknot in a Viral Cap- Independent Translation Element  Zhaohui Wang, Marc Parisien,
Advertisements

Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Molecular Biophysics of Orai Store-Operated Ca2+ Channels
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 
The Cap-Binding Translation Initiation Factor, eIF4E, Binds a Pseudoknot in a Viral Cap- Independent Translation Element  Zhaohui Wang, Marc Parisien,
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
EPR Spectroscopy Targets Structural Changes in the E
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Greta Faccio, Stefan Salentinig  Biophysical Journal 
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
High-Pressure SAXS Study of Folded and Unfolded Ensembles of Proteins
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Margaret J. Tse, Brian K. Chu, Mahua Roy, Elizabeth L. Read 
Deciphering the “Fuzzy” Interaction of FG Nucleoporins and Transport Factors Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering  Samuel Sparks, Deniz B. Temel, Michael.
The Two-State Prehensile Tail of the Antibacterial Toxin Colicin N
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Luthur Siu-Lun Cheung, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Tsuyoshi Terakawa, Shoji Takada  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Studies and Modeling of Eudistylia vancouverii Chlorocruorin and Macrobdella decora Hemoglobin  Angelika Krebs, Helmut Durchschlag,
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Amyloid Fibrillation of Insulin under Water-Limited Conditions
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering of the Cholesterol Incorporation into Human ApoA1- POPC Discoidal Particles  Søren Roi Midtgaard, Martin Cramer Pedersen,
Interactions of the Auxilin-1 PTEN-like Domain with Model Membranes Result in Nanoclustering of Phosphatidyl Inositol Phosphates  Antreas C. Kalli, Gareth.
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 104, Issue 7, Pages (April 2013)
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Mareike Zink, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Analysis of Adenovirus VAI RNA Defines the Mechanism of Inhibition of PKR  Katherine Launer-Felty, C. Jason Wong, James L. Cole  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages 748-757 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure probing of VAI. (a) Secondary structure of VAI. The complementary triplets in loops 8 and 10 are depicted in red, and the conserved tetrastem 4 is depicted in green. (b) DMS probing of VAI structure. The gel includes C and A sequencing ladders, a control lane without DMS (-), and a lane with DMS (+). Artifacts arising from reverse transcriptase pause sites are marked with an asterisk. (c) SHAPE probing of VAI structure. The gel includes C and A sequencing ladders, a control lane without SHAPE reagent (-) and a lane with 1M7 (+). Artifacts arising from reverse transcriptase pause sites are marked with an asterisk. (d) DMS and SHAPE reaction sites mapped onto the secondary structure diagram of VAI. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of central domain mutations on VAI structure and PKR binding. (a) Secondary structure of VAI indicating central domain mutations. (b) SHAPE reactivity of central domain mutations. Reactivities were quantitated using SAFA and normalized to the band corresponding to A65. The reactivities are indicated in color scale indicated in the legend. (c) Sedimentation velocity titration of PKR binding to WT (top) and L8 (bottom) VAI. The data were processed using DCDT+ (32) to produce normalized g(s∗) sedimentation velocity distribution functions. The shift in the peak maximum upon addition of 6 eq. of PKR to WT VAI is indicated by the dotted lines. The magnitude of the shift is decreased for L8 because of a reduced binding affinity. (d) Dissociation constants for PKR interaction with central domain mutants determined by global analysis using SEDANAL (33). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effects of loop 8 mutations on VAI structure and PKR binding. The locations of the mutations are indicated by red arrows. The SHAPE reactivities were quantitated and displayed as indicated in Fig. 2. The dissociation constants were determined by sedimentation velocity analysis. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SAXS analysis of VAI. (a) SAXS scattering curves for WT (green), WT + Mg2+ (brown), and L8 + Mg2+ (blue). The solid black lines show the fits of the data to p(r) distributions. All samples are at 2.0 mg/ml. Inset: Guinier analysis giving Rg values of 44.8 ± 1.0 Å (WT), 45.1 ± 0.1 Å (WT + Mg2+), and 45.9 ± 0.7 Å (L8 + Mg2+). The data are vertically offset for clarity. (b) p(r) distance distribution functions. The distributions were produced using GNOM (35) with a maximum q corresponding to 8/Rg. (c) Ab initio models generated by simulated annealing using DAMMIF (36). Twenty-five models were superimposed, averaged, and filtered using DAMAVER (37). The bead models were converted to surface representations using SITUS (38). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 SAXS analysis of ΔTS VAI. (a) SAXS scattering curves of ΔTS VAI. The solid black line shows the fit of the data to a p(r) distribution. Inset: Guinier analysis giving Rg = 32.7 ± 1.1 Å. (c) Ab initio model of ΔTS compared to WT VAI. The bead models were generated by simulated annealing using DAMMIF (36). Twenty-five models were superimposed, averaged, and filtered using DAMAVER (37). The models were converted to surface representations using SITUS (38). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Overlay of atomic models with ab initio SAXS models: (a) VAI, (b) ΔTS, (c) expanded view of the pseudoknot in VAI, and (d) L8 mutant. Atomic models were generated with RNAComposer (30) using the secondary structure constraints derived from SHAPE analysis. Models are color coded by domain: apical stem (blue), central domain (purple), and terminal stem (green). The pseudoknot is colored gold. The atomic models were aligned with the SAXS envelopes using SUPCOMB (31). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 748-757DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions