Muons from light meson decays

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Advertisements

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Bingchu Huang, USTC/BNL 1 Bingchu Huang (for STAR Collaboration) University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Cross-sections (  barn)   ot (    ) PYTHIA (*) DPMJET (*) Minimum bias (  only) Minimum bias (  only) Single  (all) (  only) (all) (  only)
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Muon rates from minimum bias (without PionDecayer)
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, Andrea Dainese 1 Status of B analysis via single electrons Andrea Dainese INFN – Legnaro based on work with: F.Antinori,
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
The dimuon physics continuum An update June 21, 2004, Sébastien Gadrat for the LPC, Clermont-Ferrand. The contributions to the dimuon spectrum above 1.5.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Eff. determination WANG Zheng Mar Feb.2008WANG Zheng2 The method  Eff. Determined from MC sample.  Eff. Determined from data. Object id/efficiency:
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
INFN - PadovaBeauty Measurements in pp with the Central Detector 1 Beauty Measurements in p-p with the Central Detector F. Antinori, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese,
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Muons from single top events for DC04
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
The University of Manchester
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
Hadronic resonances from ALICE in pp collisions
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
CMS Physics Analysis in China
Experimental Particle PhysicsPHYS6011 Performing an analysis Lecture 5
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
58th PRC Open session, October 28th, 2004 M. Mevius, DESY Hamburg
Erik Brubaker U of Chicago
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Hadronic resonances from ALICE in pp collisions
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
Muon Trigger Software Status
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Muons from light meson decays S. Spagnolo Univ. del Salento and INFN Lecce for the Muon HLT group TAPM 30 October 2007

Outline Introduction Samples Procedures to extract Muon Trigger Rates Preliminary check of different procedures for estimating the MU6 rate at EF

Introduction Dominant contributions to Low pT muon trigger rates decays in flight of light mesons p±, K±, KL leptonic decay modes of Charmed hadrons leptonic decay modes of Bottom hadrons punch-trough of hadronic shower particles: shower muons hadrons The study of the muon trigger performance over these physics events requires very large samples of minimum bias events special samples enhancing the signal to be studied

In order of descreasing cross section below 6 GeV/c p/K  m b   c   shower muons punch-through

Samples Minimum bias Samples with forced decays misal1_csc11.005001.pythia_minbias.digit.RDO several samples simulated with different caches of 12.0.X Minimum Bias total cross section From Pythia output on these jobs: 54.71 mb (non single diffractive) From A. Moraes et al. stot = 102 (pythia*) 118 (phojet) mb snsd = 65 (pythia*) 73 (phojet) mb Samples with forced decays The purpose is study rejection cuts for fake muon on high statistics samples - how much suitable for cross section ( rate evaluation ) ? Minimum bias with PionDecayer misal1_mc12_V1.005001.pythia_minbias.digit.RDO.v12000604_tid008665 - generated with 12.0.6.1 simulated with 12.0.6.4 Single Pions with PionDecayer (see S. Grancagnolo in previous TAPM meetings) * Pythia 6.124 with a tuning for MB at LHC based on comparison with DATA http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=19298 SN-ATLAS-2006-057

Minumum bias with PionDecayer Abort the simulation of events without a charged pion or kaon with pT>2GeV/c (low pT cut in order to study feed-through of muons below threshold in the trigger acceptance) cross section of the sample is 34.55 % of standard MB s Select randomly one p or K above threshold; flag it with GenStat=9999 define the proper time td (center of mass frame) of the decay in order to force the decay vertex in a cylinder of R = 1115 mm and L = 3500mm (ID volume) events with muons from forced decay have to be re-weighted for the probability of the parent p or K to decay before showering w = Mean Path before hadr. int. x Mp/k / (p c t) flagged p/k can have hadr. int. before td + decay channel is free not necessarily there will be a muon in each event the rest of the event is not biased other light mesons can freely decay into muons – weight = 1 for them

Procedures to extract Muon Trigger Rates Latest result in terms of muon trigger rates prepared by the Muon Trigger Group have been presented at the Mini Workshop on trigger menus; 24-25 Sep 2007 – G. Siragusa http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=11&sessionId=1&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=20373 How are rates computed (mu6, as an example): obtain from single muons of pT in the range 2 – 100 GeV/c efficiency of LVL1 mu6 vs pT efficiency of LVL2 (muComb) w.r.t. LVL1 accepted events effciency of EF (MuidCombined) w.r.t. LVL2 accepted events effective thresholds applied at LVL2 and EF in order to keep 90 % eff. at the nominal threshold convolve efficiencies with cross sections ds/dpT for the most important processes rate of mu6 at EF for Luminosity = 1031 cm-2 s-1 ~50 Hz M.A.Dufour running a trigger menu for 1031 cm-2 s-1 on Minimum Bias sample reports a rate of mu6 at EF = 206 Hz

Procedures to extract Muon Trigger Rates Room for arrange the discrepancy cross sections ? Procedure (efficiency on single muons) ? how trustable is the trigger decision output

Cross sections for muons from light mesons decays used for muon trigger rates PYTHIA (*) DPMJET (*) stot(pm) (all) (p only) (K only) (p± only) (K± only) 3<pT<45 GeV 38.4 22.8 15.5 81.2 38.1 33.8 36.7 21.9 14.8 77.8 36.6 32.4 4<pT<45 GeV 10.3 5.98 4.3 20.3 9.48 8.6 9.85 5.73 4.1 19.5 9.10 8.2 5<pT<45 GeV 3.56 2.04 1.53 6.51 3.04 2.7 3.42 1.96 1.47 6.25 2.92 2.6 6<pT<45 GeV 1.48 0.83 0.64 2.59 1.21 1.07 1.42 0.79 0.61 2.49 1.16 1.03 from several years ago |h|<2.7 (*) Oren Y. and Nisati L. |h|<2.4 DPMJET default for rates computation (more conservative)

Comparison of old p/k predictions with new simulations Cross section for muons with pT >4 GeV/c <2.4 from decays in flight of light mesons Normalization to s Minimum bias = 80 mb OLD Pythia 9.85 mb DPMJET 19.5 mb CSC Minimum bias samples (pythia) – 300k events processed p 5.4±1.2 mb k 8.9±1.5 mb Total 14.3 mb T.Buanes 11.5 mb (10 Oct. B-Physics meeting) CSC Minimum bias + Pion Decayer – 110k events processed p 5 ± 1 mb (16 std decays + 6.4 forced decays) k 5 ± 1 mb (16 std decays + 5.5 forced) Total 10 mb large statistical error driven by standard decays

Comparison of old p/k predictions with new simulations Cross section for muons with pT >4 GeV/c <2.4 from decays in flight of light mesons Normalization to s Minimum bias = 80 mb CSC Minimum bias + Pion Decayer – 110k events processed try to use only forced decays in order to reduce stat. errors: a) 34.5% (16.2) ev. have mesons with pT > 2GeV/c b) multiplicity of p/k in such events is 2.03 / 1.46 c) from forced decays measure eff. for forced p/K to give muons above threshold p 4.2 ± 0.1 mb k 4.2 ± 0.3 mb Total 8.4 mb lower statistical error but some systematic effect to be well understood: errors on numbers in a)-c) ? decay volume too small ? any unpredicted bias ?

First look at Muon Rates in MB events Muon Rates studies in the HLT community are under way for the finalization of the ATLAS detector paper and will be presented at the TP week tomorrow muon slice meeting to discuss/understand/finalize procedures and numbers Meanwhile here we present a quick and preliminary look at EF rates for mu6 in comparison with M.A. Dufour at the mini-workshop on trigger menus running muon trigger slice in 13.0.30.2 over MB (160K events) output in AANT looking at trigger decision in AOD produced with 12.0.6 for MB (20k events) and J0-J8 samples

First look at Muon Rates in MB events OLD studies MU6 @ EF 50 Hz MB AOD MU6 @ EF 1 event accepted  40 ± 40 Hz MB AOD 0 events / 20k J0 AOD 15 “  103 ± 27 J1 14 8 ± 2 J2 50 8 ± 1 J3 124 1 ± 0.1 J0-J8  120 ± 30 Hz M.A. Dufour for MU4 showed that J0-J8 / MB = 0.57 assuming this scaling factor is conserved at MU6 (conservative) total MB rate ~ 208 Hz in agreement with M.A.Dufour MB AANT MU6 @ EF 160 ± 30 Hz (32 accepted ev.s / 160k) composition: 1 p, 2 k, 18 c, 7 b, 4 feed-through (or not understood)

Conclusions Current cross sections for light mesons decaying into muons seems in reasonable agreement with old estimates care must be used with samples with forced decays larger rates observed with std approach (trigger decision, event counting) w.r.t. to OLD procedure for muon rate estimate probably low cross sections for muons from charm and bottom have been assumed until now more news and details for the TP week