G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Advertisements

A Protein Dynamics Study of Photosystem II: The Effects of Protein Conformation on Reaction Center Function  Sergej Vasil’ev, Doug Bruce  Biophysical.
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
The Protonation State of the Glu-71/Asp-80 Residues in the KcsA Potassium Channel: A First-Principles QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Study  Denis Bucher, Leonardo.
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on SDF-1α: Binding with CXCR4 Receptor
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Onset of Anthrax Toxin Pore Formation
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Liqiang Dai, Holger Flechsig, Jin Yu  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Marian Breuer, Kevin M. Rosso, Jochen Blumberger  Biophysical Journal 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Microscopic Mechanism of Antibiotics Translocation through a Porin
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
The Role of Higher CO-Multipole Moments in Understanding the Dynamics of Photodissociated Carbonmonoxide in Myoglobin  Nuria Plattner, Markus Meuwly 
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Mechanism for Stabilizing a Short Helical Peptide Studied by Generalized- Ensemble Simulations with Explicit Solvent  Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto 
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Dominico Vigil, Stephen C. Gallagher, Jill Trewhella, Angel E. García 
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Using Metadynamics to Understand the Mechanism of Calmodulin/Target Recognition at Atomic Detail  G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal  Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages 2768-2777 (October 2006) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.086611 Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (a) Structure of CaM bound to its highest affinity target peptide (M13), as determined by NMR spectroscopy (8): CaM (red) and M13 (blue) Cα chains are drawn as ribbons; the side chains of the two anchors (W-4 and F-17), which bind to the C- and N-domains, are represented as yellow and green sticks, respectively. (b) PDB entries and peptide sequences of the 15 CaM/peptide complex structures which have been determined so far (anthrax edema factor, which is a CaM/protein complex (58), is not included here). The helical regions (as defined by the program DSSP (42)) are boxed. The two anchors (10) are colored as in panel a. For convenience, sequences are printed with the first of the two anchors aligned. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 2768-2777DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.086611) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MD simulation of the CaM/M13 complex. I. Comparison of the Cα traces of the initial structure (PDB entry 2BBM, shown in blue) and the final MD structure (red). II. Top: number of violated NMR restraints as a function of time. Middle: violation distance for each violated restraint (averaged over the frames in which violations occur). Bottom: total time for which each restraint is violated, if any violation occurs. In the last two, intramolecular restraints range from 1 to 1,486 for CaM and from 1,487 to 1,650 for M13; intermolecular restraints range from 1,651 to 1,782. III. Values of CW-4 (black) and CF-17 (red) order parameters (see definition in Computational Details) along the MD trajectory (top), and RMSD of backbone atoms with respect to the experimental structure (bottom) are plotted as a function of time. IV. S2 order parameters of CaM NH and methionines’ methyl groups: experimental (green solid circles) and calculated (red empty circles). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 2768-2777DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.086611) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Metadynamics calculations. Free energy (kcal/mol) associated to the final step of dehydration of the anchors’ binding pockets in the CaM/M13 complex. I. Two-dimensional and II. Three-dimensional plots of the free energy as a function of the anchor coordination numbers CW-4 and CF-17, as defined in the Computational Details. The coloring scheme in I. provides the energies, in II. the values of the cost function based on the NMR restraints (8,38). In II., the 21 experimental structures deposited in the PDB are represented as black dots. III. Contribution of the methionines in the W-4 binding site, i.e., CW-4(Met)/CW-4(total). IV. Same for the F-17 binding site. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 2768-2777DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.086611) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Metadynamics calculations. Molecular recognition of the W-4 (top) and F-17 (bottom) anchors from the partially hydrated states (D1 and D2 in Fig. 3) to the dehydrated complex (Ga and Gb). (a) Schematic representation of the anchors (blue) conformations: the light blue cartoon indicates the full hydrophobic pocket; Methionine side chains (yellow) and Ile side chains (green) are also shown; arrows indicate transitions explicitly observed in the simulation. (b) Corresponding three-dimensional structures of the binding sites. The peptide Cα traces are shown in blue. CaM’s solvent accessible surface is colored according to atom types (sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon in yellow, red, blue, and gray, respectively). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 2768-2777DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.086611) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Metadynamics calculations. Van der Waals interactions (kcal/mol) of W-4, F-17, and their pockets with the whole system (including solvent), calculated with the AMBER force field (34) on the metadynamics trajectory. The four components are defined including both (hydrophobic) side-chain and (polar) backbone atoms. Values at the free energy minimum Ga (CW-4, F-17=90, 45) are taken as the reference. Color scale equal to that of the free energy (Fig. 3). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 2768-2777DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.086611) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions