Suburban Metro Area Continuum of Care

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life After HPRP Barbara Poppe, Executive Director, USICH March 26, 2012.
Advertisements

Retooling Transitional Housing
SSVF Program Launch: Establishing Services in Compliance with Goals and Regulations Practice Area 1: Outreach, Engagement and Admission.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Webinar Series Priority 1/Surge National Kick-Off October 16, 2014.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
OCTOBER 2012 MONTGOMERY COUNTY ROADMAP FOR HOUSING STABILITY.
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
Federal and State Funding Shifts to Rapid Re-Housing: The Positive Impact on Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing Programs Audio Conference sponsored.
HUD’s Homeless Assistance Ann Marie Oliva. Overview of Presentation Update on Status of Regulations FY 2013 and FY 2014 Budgets and Implications Policy.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
Learnings from the Maricopa County Human Services Campus, DAVID BRIDGE MANAGING DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS LODESTAR DAY RESOURCE CENTER.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
Homeless Crisis Response System
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR COORDINATED ENTRY Status: Approved by Eastern PA CoC Governing Board on October 19, 2015 Revised:
New Department on Homelessness: The Development Process.
All Home Stakeholder Meeting July 20, Agenda Welcome General Updates Measuring System Performance in King County Role of System Performance and.
Reallocation and Prioritization
Objectives General overview of Central Navigation Central Navigation function requirements for the state CYI system Collective Impact processes for establishing.
Presentation to the Joint CSAC/LCC Homelessness Task Force
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Status: Approved by Eastern PA CoC Governing Board on October 19, 2015
Megan Kurteff Schatz February 23, 2017
Strategies to Prevent and End Homelessness
Policy Advisor | U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
NAEH Preconference Session July 17, :00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
2016 Coc visioning session December 20, 2016.
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness
Anchorage Community Plan to End Homelessness
Types Of Prioritization & Matching Primarily two: Bucket Prioritization Continuous Prioritization.
Allocation Plan 2016 Continuum of Care NOFA.
2.05 Diversion: A Key Element of a Homelessness System
Midland County Continuum of Care
Florida Institute on Homelessness & Affordable Housing Input Session
Coordinated Entry Committee
Minnesota Office to Prevent and End Homelessness
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Continuum of care for the homeless
Setting the Foundation – Systems Planning Approach.
LESAR DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Systems Design For an Effective Crisis Response System to End Homelessness Kay Moshier McDivitt SENIOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST Florida Institute.
Single Adult Homelessness Advisory Group
Building Changes’ Strategic Business Planning Process
Evaluating and Improving Coordinated Entry Systems NAEH Conference on Family & Youth Homelessness February 2017.
Investigating Racial Disparities in the Homeless System and Considering Implications for Policy Tracy Bennett and Genevieve Williamson.
Investigating Racial Disparities in the Homeless System and Considering Implications for Policy Tracy Bennett and Genevieve Williamson.
Confronting Data Related Barriers in Youth Homelessness Initiatives
System Performance Measures: Goal
Lessons Learned and Work to Do
Capital Area Coalition on Homelessness
Building An Effective Coordinated Entry System
What we learned system performance az balance of state coc
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Brian Sangutei Supervisor Health Care for Homeless Veterans Program
A home for everyone is key
Keys to Housing Security
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
SMAC CE Workshop August 6th, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Suburban Metro Area Continuum of Care SMAC 2019 Annual Meeting Suburban Metro Area Continuum of Care

2018 Year in Review What is SMAC anyway?

Episodes of homelessness Prevent homelessness whenever possible, and otherwise making it rare, brief, and non-recurring PREVENT RARE BRIEF Episodes of homelessness New incidents Housing outcomes This chart helps to explain the concept. [Read title and go through animations] Coordinated Entry Person Centered Approaches Moving from Program Centric to Person Centric Collaboration NON-RECURRING Recidivism

Who we used to be.

What is CoC? The Continuum of Care is responsible for coordinating and implementing a system to meet the needs of the homeless population within the geographic area. Homelessness is a complex issue. As you will see throughout our time together this afternoon the way we work to find solutions is also complex. We have a fantastic opportunity with all of these amazing stakeholders working toward the same goal- end homelessness (make rare, brief, and non-reoccurring) however we are at times our own worst enemy as we often work in silos instead of planning together. The Continuum has the responsibility per HUD to ensure a coordinated homeless response system.

2018 Accomplishments Implementation of Case Consultation Data Driven Strategies CES Prioritization shift for ending Chronic Homelessness Quarterly Provider workshops SMAC/Ramsey combined Coordinated Entry supplemental questions NOFA Scoring Tool TA CoC Grantee Quarterly Review Process Implemented

What does the data say? And what does it mean! In the last 6 months, SMAC has worked hard to make data available and accessible to begin informing policy decisions. Coordinated Entry data is newly available in a more usable format, ICA has supported work to look at System Performance Measure data on a more regular basis. We are going to share some of that data with you today. Looking at most of this data is still fairly new so it is early to be seeing trend lines in most cases. And what does it mean!

Coordinated Entry Data: Total Households on the Priority List The numbers on the Coordinated Entry list continue to increase

Coordinated Entry: Unduplicated Households in 2018 Total Net Change Net Change % Singles 788 235 30% increase Single Youth 385 122 32% increase Families 434 140 Youth Families 179 98 55% increase A concerning trend the Governing Board is keeping an eye on is the increasing number of youth families being added to the list. This is not the only youth data SMAC has looked at that raises red flags. In the coming year SMAC will work to develop recommendations regarding youth experiencing homelessness in SMAC. If you want to be part of that work please participate in the youth breakout session!

Chronically Homeless Household on the Coordinated Entry Priority List

System Performance Improvement System Performance Measure 5 Decrease of 14.54% System Performance Measure 7 Increase 27% from 2016-2017 Using data to inform planning for the homeless response system is still a somewhat new concept. However, to create a true systemic approach to ending homelessness it is essential to look at data to tell us if we are doing the right stuff and help us correct course if we aren’t. System Performance Measures help us to gauge how our system is functioning. SMAC priorities for 2019 were set using data from the 7 measures. The two shown here are areas SMAC made improvement. From 2015 to 2017 SMAC decreased the number of individuals becoming homeless for the first time from 2,179 to 1,786. SMAC has also seen improvement in successful exits from street outreach from 2016 to 2017.

2018 Point in Time Data System Performance Measure 3 Even with improvements in some areas, SMAC is still seeing an increase in our total number of households experiencing homelessness and more concerning an increase in unsheltered homelessness across the region as you can see from the Point in Time totals.

Areas to Improve System Performance Measure 2: Returns to Homelessness Successful Exits While both Measure 2 and Measure 7 show improvement from 2016 to 2017, the improvement is small and there is work to be done to ensure continued improvement in both measures. We want to see returns to homelessness dropping and we want to see successful exits increasing!

Areas to Improve System Performance Measure 1: Length of Time Homeless The measure with the most room for improvement is Length of Time Homeless. The increase in Length of Time Homeless is significant form 2016 to 2017 and has not improved since this data was submitted to HUD. 3 of the 5 priority strategies for SMAC focus on this strategy but the Governing Board acknowledges that there are other strategies we will need to implement over time to ensure that these numbers start going down instead of up.

What’s up for 2019? And how can you be involved!

SMAC Priorities for 2019 FHPAP alignment Measure 2 Returns Developing Prevention and Diversion processes Developing process for faster shelter exits Measure 1 LOT Homeless Measure 7 Successful exits Encouraging Multi-Family Affordable Housing Development Measure 7 Successful Exits Homeless Preference with PHAs The 3 System Performance Measures SMAC will be working to improve in 2019 are Length of Time Homeless, Returns to Homelessness and Successful Exits. If you want to learn more about actions regarding these priorities reach out to any of the SMAC Governing Board members!

Coordinated Entry Phase 2 Wait we have to do it all over again!

Coordinated Entry Today Coordinated Entry as we know it today has been implemented in SMAC since January 2015.    When SMAC implemented CES it was intentionally decided to begin our process in the middle (with coordinated access to homeless specific housing programs) as opposed to at the beginning (incorporating prevention, outreach and shelter). 

Coordinated Entry of the Future Coordinated Entry as HUD envisions, is the way we do business, essentially how we respond to preventing and ending homelessness.  In HUD’s eyes it is how the CoC offers coordinated services for all households needing homeless prevention and homeless assistance resources.  It isn’t a “program” unto itself, it is our homeless response system.

Hearth Act Definition Minimum requirements for this systematic approach include: Emergency shelters Rapid rehousing Transitional housing Permanent supportive housing Prevention strategies Available resources through the Continuum of Care program are not sufficient to prevent and end homelessness, coordination and integration of other funding streams, including the Emergency Solutions Grants program and mainstream resources, is integral to carrying out the Continuum of Care System.

Prevention Immediate response/System nimbleness Integration with mainstream benefits Centralized hub that understands prevention resources available across the CoC and can make warm handoffs to those resources Coordinated access to prevention resources Streamlined prevention assessment tool Prevention approach includes supporting households housed through Coordinated Entry remain stably housed

Outreach All outreach workers are CES assessors Outreach updates assessments as contacts happen Outreach can provide resources to reduce barriers while waiting for housing Outreach provides support to resolve immediate housing crisis Outreach workers provide navigation services as defined by the CoC as allowed by the funding stream Outreach agency participates in Case Consultation Incorporate outreach from non-traditional outreach resources

Crisis Response/Emergency Shelter Access to shelter is low barrier and as immediate as possible Screening is aligned and prioritized consistently across the region Centralized hub for shelter resources All assessors understand the crisis response options for households they are assessing All assessors can make a warm handoff to available emergency shelter options Emergency Shelter staff are an integral part of Case Consultation Households in shelter are prioritized through Cases Consultation

Timeline Integrated Outreach response Fall 2019 Integrated Crisis Response/Emergency Shelter response January 2020 Integrated Prevention response by Fall 2021

Planning Coordinated Entry Work Group County Partners Shelter Providers

SMAC 2019 Initiatives As if all of that wasn’t enough!

Supporting Partnerships for Anti-Racist Communities: SPARC People of color in Minnesota, specifically African-American and American Indian households, experience homelessness and housing instability at rates that are 7-8 times higher than their representation within the general population in Minnesota

SPARC in Minnesota The Minnesota SPARC Learning Collaborative is designed to accomplish the following goals: Increase the capacity of communities to understand and respond to racial inequities in homelessness Assist communities in developing structural change objectives Implement effective strategies to reduce the number of people of color experiencing homelessness

SPARC in SMAC The Collaborative will occur over 12 months and will combine three in-person Learning Sessions and virtual coaching through specific, time-limited action periods. Teams of 4-7 people representing the CoC, housing and homeless service providers, funders, people with lived experience of homelessness and other key stakeholders from each local community will focus on five stages of work:  Community Engagement Data Analysis Action Planning Implementation and Evaluation Sustainability

True Colors Inclusion Assessment True Colors United implements innovative solutions to youth homelessness that focus on the unique experiences of LGBTQ young people. The Inclusion Assessment process in order to enable service providers to assess their current level of LGBTQ- inclusive and affirming practices and policies.

True Colors Inclusion Assessment in SMAC Introductory Webinar Friday, March 29 1:00-2:00 Targeting Emergency Shelter and Rapid Re-housing first Three Step Assessment Process: Organizational Overview All-Staff Survey Client Survey

Ending Veteran Homelessness

Work Sessions SPARC Youth Affordable Housing Development Coordinated Entry Phase 2

Thank you!! Please visit the SMAC website and sign up for the distribution list! smacmn.org For questions about today’s meeting reach out to Abby Guilford abby@mesh-mn.org