Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 105, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Advertisements

Michiko Tashiro, Hana Inoue, Masato Konishi  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Chang-Chun Lee, Yen Sun, Huey W. Huang  Biophysical Journal 
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Chiu Shuen Hui, Henry R. Besch, Keshore R. Bidasee  Biophysical Journal 
Jakubs Kubiak, Jonathan Brewer, Søren Hansen, Luis A. Bagatolli 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
Hiren Patel, Quang Huynh, Dominik Bärlehner, Heiko Heerklotz 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Joseph E. Faust, Pei-Yin Yang, Huey W. Huang  Biophysical Journal 
Pulsatile Lipid Vesicles under Osmotic Stress
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Taylor Fuselier, William C. Wimley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Jérôme Lang, Amandine Maréchal, Manon Couture, Jérôme Santolini 
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Yongling Zhu, Jian Xu, Stephen F. Heinemann  Neuron 
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Aida Ebrahimi, Laszlo N. Csonka, Muhammad A. Alam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
H.M. Seeger, G. Marino, A. Alessandrini, P. Facci  Biophysical Journal 
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Mechanistic Differences in the Membrane Activity of Bax and Bcl-xL Correlate with Their Opposing Roles in Apoptosis  Stephanie Bleicken, Corinna Wagner,
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Gel-Assisted Formation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Role of Cholesterol in the Formation and Nature of Lipid Rafts in Planar and Spherical Model Membranes  Jonathan M. Crane, Lukas K. Tamm  Biophysical.
Senthil Arumugam, Eugene P. Petrov, Petra Schwille  Biophysical Journal 
Direct Visualization of Lipid Domains in Human Skin Stratum Corneum's Lipid Membranes: Effect of pH and Temperature  I. Plasencia, L. Norlén, L.A. Bagatolli 
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
V.P. Ivanova, I.M. Makarov, T.E. Schäffer, T. Heimburg 
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Electroformed from Native Membranes and Organic Lipid Mixtures under Physiological Conditions  L.-Ruth Montes, Alicia Alonso,
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Lipid Raft Composition Modulates Sphingomyelinase Activity and Ceramide-Induced Membrane Physical Alterations  Liana C. Silva, Anthony H. Futerman, Manuel.
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Acyl Chain Length and Saturation Modulate Interleaflet Coupling in Asymmetric Bilayers: Effects on Dynamics and Structural Order  Salvatore Chiantia,
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Fernando D. Marengo, Jonathan R. Monck  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Hazen P. Babcock, Chen Chen, Xiaowei Zhuang  Biophysical Journal 
Electroporation of DC-3F Cells Is a Dual Process
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages (December 2013)
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
Phase Equilibria in DOPC/DPPC-d62/Cholesterol Mixtures
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Electroformation of Giant Vesicles from an Inverse Phase Precursor
Ana Coutinho, Liana Silva, Alexander Fedorov, Manuel Prieto 
Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A. Riske  Biophysical Journal  Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 1609-1619 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Thermal treatment of preformed agarose-GUVs releases polymer from vesicle interior. Images show agarose-GUVs made in films of fluorescent agarose, before (left) and after (right) temperature treatment. Bars: 10 μm. The membrane is labeled with 0.5 mol % DPPE-Rh. Below, agarose fluorescence inside vesicles before (blue) and after (green) heating. Red squares show mean values with standard deviation. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects of entrapped polymer on agarose-GUVs upon poration. (A) Vesicle rupture and expulsion of a gel-like meshwork through a macropore observed on two different vesicles. (B) Loss of sugar asymmetry and leakage of entrapped fluorescent dye. Upper rows: phase contrast. Lower rows: confocal microscopy. The membrane is labeled with 0.5 mol % DPPE-NBD (green) and the encapsulated dye is 2.5 μM sulforhodamine (red). The times indicated on top of each snapshot are relative to the moment of pulse application (time 0). The field direction is indicated on the second image in the sequences. Arrows point to visible macropores. Arrowhead points to the GUV after expulsion of the meshwork and pore closure; above, one can also see the expulsed agarose meshwork. Bars: 20 μm. The complete sequences of panel A (phase contrast) and B (confocal microscopy) are shown in the Supporting Material (Movie S1 and Movie S2, respectively). (C) Quantification of the fraction of GUVs, which exhibit rupture with expulsion (Xrupture) or contrast loss (Xleak), for agarose-free GUVs, agarose-GUVs, and heated agarose-GUVs as observed under phase contrast. At least four different measurements, each containing 10–20 GUVs/chamber from two different batches were performed. Xleak is calculated in respect to nonruptured vesicles, see text for details. Membrane composition: POPC/POPG 8:2. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Kinetics of dye release after electroporation obtained with epifluorescence microscopy. (A) Sequence showing the release of sulforhodamine (initial internal concentration 2.5 μM) from an agarose-GUV after poration. The field direction is shown on the first snapshot. The time relative to pulse application (t = 0) is shown on each snapshot. Arrows indicate the location of the macropores observed by transient release of the dye. Bar: 20 μm. (B) Kinetics of dye release for the agarose-GUV shown in A (blue open circles), one typical agarose-free (black solid circles), and heated agarose-GUVs (green open squares). The red curve represents the exponential fit to the second (slow) leakage process, τleak. The background fluorescence was subtracted and the data were normalized by the fluorescence intensity difference before the pulse. The postpulse variation in fluorescence intensity shown for agarose-free and heated agarose-GUVs arises from small differences in the focal plane. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relaxation time (τrelax) and pore lifetime (Tpore) in porated vesicles. (A) Sequence of a typical agarose-GUV upon application of a pulse. The field direction is indicated in the first snapshot. Numbers represent time (time 0 marks the detection of the pulse as GUV response). Arrows point to macropores. Bar: 20 μm. (B) Aspect ratio a/b measured in the vesicle shown in A as a function of time. The cartoon shows the vesicle semiaxis a and b. The red curve shows the exponential fit with characteristic time τrelax. The time interval with length Tpore when macropores are detected is shaded in gray. (C) Values of τrelax and Tpore for agarose-free, agarose-, and heated agarose-GUVs—black, blue, and red circles, respectively. Each point represents a measurement on a single vesicle. The values of Tpore have a lower limit of 17 ms corresponding to the temporal resolution of the camera. Red squares show mean values with standard deviations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Fast relaxation times (τ1) in the absence of macroporation. (A) Sequence of images of an agarose-GUV during and after pulse application (0.6 kV.cm−1/600 μs). Numbers in the images represent time (time 0 is set as the beginning of the pulse). Bar: 10 μm. (B) Aspect ratio a/b as a function of time and subsequent relaxation data (blue open circles) for the vesicle shown in panel A. Red curve is the fit with a single exponential decay with characteristic time τ1. (C) τ1 values for agarose-free GUVs (black), agarose-GUVs (blue), and heated agarose-GUVs (green). Each data point represents one vesicle. Three consecutive pulses, spaced by >1 min, were applied to each vesicle and the three obtained τ1 values were averaged for each GUV. No difference in vesicle response was observed for the three consecutive pulses applied to the same GUV (not shown). Red squares are average values with standard deviation. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sketch of all possible scenarios for the response of agarose-free and agarose-GUVs exposed to electrodeformation and poration. Sulforhodamine and sucrose (represented as gray shading inside the vesicles) and agarose (green) are initially encapsulated inside the agarose-rich vesicles. Upon pulse application, the vesicles deform and may porate depending on pulse strength. The vesicle relaxation times in the presence and absence of poration (τrelax and τ1, respectively) are longer for agarose-GUVs. When exposed to pulses causing macroporation, the agarose-free vesicles porate and fully reseal. For most vesicles (containing low and intermediate concentration of encapsulated agarose as exemplified in the cartoon by the vesicles filled with less agarose), after closure of the macropores with characteristic lifetime Tpore, a leaky state is maintained resulting from the presence of agarose in the formed pores. Vesicles with high agarose concentration expulse a gel-like meshwork through the formed macropore, accompanied with fast and total mixing of internal and external contents. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1609-1619DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.009) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions