Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Advertisements

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.

Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

RCTs: randomized controlled ...

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.

Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry for human cell differentiation molecules in samples of the right ventricular septum from ... Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.

Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

FIGURE 1 Major activities in the working week of a banker

Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look for a resource; (2) determine whether there are one or more resources in the ... Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look.

Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms

Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of AAV in three clinically relevant disease categories defined by clinical ... Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of.

Figure 3. Key words and phrases from narrative text by classification category. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to.

Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.

Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.

Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA

Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees that rejected a flower harboring a spider more often after a simulated attack by a spider (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text) than before the simulated attack (in Offer 1). Naïve honeybees were initially presented with a flower harboring either a red or yellow spider (“First spider color”), before being subject to a simulated attack, and then presented with a spider of the same or a different color (“Second spider color”). Both before and after the attack, flowers were presented up to 10 times to each honeybee until they were accepted. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary129 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4 The effect of the spider color morphs encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 4 The effect of the spider color morphs encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees which landed (response = land) and fed upon (response = feed) flowers the first time they were presented to them following a simulated attack by a spider (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text). Naïve honeybees were initially presented with a flower harboring either a red or yellow spider (“First spider color”), before being subject to a simulated attack, and then presented with a spider of the same or a different color (“Second spider color”). Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary129 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 Proportion of honeybees which fed on flowers harboring a spider on the first occasion they were presented ... Figure 3 Proportion of honeybees which fed on flowers harboring a spider on the first occasion they were presented after the honeybee had experienced a simulated attack associated with either a red or a yellow spider in Experiment 2 (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text). Data are shown for trials which were conducted on 4 different days. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary129 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2 Mean (±SE) number of times a flower harboring a spider was presented to, and rejected by, naïve foraging ... Figure 2 Mean (±SE) number of times a flower harboring a spider was presented to, and rejected by, naïve foraging honeybees before it was accepted in Experiment 2. Spiders were of 2 different color morphs (red and yellow), and data are shown for trials which were conducted on 4 different days. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary129 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E. plantagineum, and inflorescences of L. stoechas, that were ... Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E. plantagineum, and inflorescences of L. stoechas, that were accepted (upper 2 panels) or inspected (lower panel) by honeybees. Accepted flowers are shown as a proportion of all flowers (upper panel) or a proportion of only those flowers which were inspected (middle panel). Flowers harbored a red or yellow female spider, or a male spider, or no spider (control). Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary129 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.