Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Dechang Li, Ming S. Liu, Baohua Ji  Biophysical Journal 
Yinghao Wu, Barry Honig, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Multiparticle Adhesive Dynamics
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Diffusion in a Fluid Membrane with a Flexible Cortical Cytoskeleton
Evidence for a Common Mode of Transcription Factor Interaction with Chromatin as Revealed by Improved Quantitative Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching 
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Intermembrane Docking Reactions Are Regulated by Membrane Curvature
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Phase Transitions in Biological Systems with Many Components
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Marc Jendrny, Thijs J. Aartsma, Jürgen Köhler  Biophysical Journal 
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Arne Schreiber, Sebastian Fischer, Thorsten Lang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Yong Wang, Paul Penkul, Joshua N. Milstein  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Collective Cell Migration in Embryogenesis Follows the Laws of Wetting
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A.
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Alexander J. Sodt, Richard W. Pastor  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Firdaus Samsudin, Alister Boags, Thomas J. Piggot, Syma Khalid 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Comparative Studies of Microtubule Mechanics with Two Competing Models Suggest Functional Roles of Alternative Tubulin Lateral Interactions  Zhanghan.
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
Yinghao Wu, Barry Honig, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Demian Riccardi, Qiang Cui, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages 2216-2228 (May 2016) Geometry of the Contact Zone between Fused Membrane-Coated Beads Mimicking Cell-Cell Fusion  Filip Savić, Torben-Tobias Kliesch, Sarah Verbeek, Chunxiao Bao, Jan Thiart, Alexander Kros, Burkhard Geil, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal  Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages 2216-2228 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026 Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic depiction of the membrane fusion process. (A) Two species of membrane-coated beads are present in our experiments—one fraction of beads carries E3/E4 fusogenic peptides incorporated into the membrane (orange helices) and the other fraction displays the complementary K3/K4 fusogenic peptides (green helices). (B) Close contact of two complementary beads facilitated by formation of coiled-coil structures leads to membrane fusion, yielding a single continuous membrane covering both spheres. (C) Confocal laser scanning micrograph of membrane-coated beads with a continuous membrane spanning both spheres. Gray scale with inverted colors. Scale bar, 5 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Illustration of the reference FRAP experiment performed on single spheres. (A) Confocal laser scanning micrograph of single sphere with fluorescently labeled lipid membrane before bleaching. (B) Fluorescence micrograph after bleaching half of the sphere vertically; bleaching area highlighted as black half-circle. (C) Recovery of fluorescence intensity within bleached area. Overall intensity lowered. (D) Schematic representation of the FRAP experiment with x0 as a variable bleaching position. All fluorescence micrographs are in gray scale with inverted colors. Scale bar, 5 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Illustration of the FRAP experiment performed on fused pairs of membrane-coated silica spheres. Scale bar, 5 μm. (A) Confocal laser scanning micrograph of two silica spheres with fused membranes. A region of interest (black circle) is chosen to cover one of the two spheres. Another region on a distant sphere (black circle, dashed line) is chosen as a reference to account for general photobleaching. (B) Region of interest is bleached with a high-intensity laser pulse. (C) Recovery of fluorescence intensity recorded in bleaching region. Fusion of membranes is clearly visible due to loss in fluorescence intensity of the second, unbleached sphere. Homogeneous fluorescence intensity before and after bleaching indicates full fusion. (D) Sketch of the experiment. One sphere of the fused pair is bleached; the fluorescence recovery is observed within the bleached area. The contact angle α is introduced as the angle between the x axis connecting sphere centers and a line connecting a sphere center and the point of delamination of the membrane from the sphere. All fluorescence micrographs are in gray scale and inverted colors. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) Example FRAP experiment performed on a pair of fused membrane-coated silica beads. Fluorescence recovery within the bleached area (circles) alongside the intensity of a single reference bead (squares) to correct for general bleaching and the background (diamonds) is shown. (B) Normalized fluorescence recovery fn(t) (circles), and the fluorescence depletion Fn(t) calculated (squares). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Histogram of experimental values for the time constant τ obtained on single spheres with a Gaussian kernel density estimate (red). Time constant τ obtained from simulations is shown in blue (dashed line). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Histogram of time constants τ found experimentally with fusion pairs of both E3/K3 and E4/K4 pairs combined. The simulated time constant is shown as a green dashed line. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Histogram of diffusion coefficients found experimentally with particle tracking of single fluorescently labeled lipids on single spheres. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Schematic cut through the geometry of the contact zone of two beads in contact. The value RS denotes the radius of the spheres, and RB and RT are the minor and major radii of the ring torus, respectively. The value AB shows the membrane supported by the spheres before fusion, and AR shows an approximation of the new geometry of the membrane after fusion, forming a torus in three dimensions. The value α is the contact angle, determined by the transition of the sphere and the torus. The value xc is half the width of the contact zone. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Relative membrane area, defined as the ratio of AR to AB in Fig. 8, as a function of the contact angle α. The ratio is independent of the size of the spheres. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Random walk of a single particle on the geometry of a pair of fused beads. The time is color-coded in arbitrary units; the geometry of the fused beads is depicted via a mesh of belts around the geometry. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 (A) Fluorescence recovery simulated on a single bead as a function of the bleaching position x0, according to the bleaching scheme in Fig. 2. (B) The time constant of the fluorescence recovery is roughly proportional to the area bleached. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 Extrapolation of fluorescence depletion curves exemplified with simulation assuming α = 1.74°. Black and red with linear scaling, and blue and green with semilogarithmic scaling, showing dominance of a single exponential decay for long times. Simulated intensities above tf were used for the fit. Extrapolation was used for small angles to compute time constants, where explicit simulation would not be computationally feasible and, in fact, unnecessary. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 (A) Fluorescence recovery simulated on fused beads as a function of the contact angle α, according to the bleaching scheme in Fig. 3. Contact angle is increasing from red to blue. (B) Calculated time constants τ. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 14 (A) van der Waals interaction energy as a function of intersphere distance. (B) Enlarged section of the interaction energy, corresponding to shown intermediates. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 15 Change in energy upon full fusion of the membranes on two membrane-coated silica spheres. The different values of the spontaneous curvature c0 are color-coded. Black lines depict the van der Waals energy released by the interaction of the two spheres, thus total energy change below this line is negative. Green dots indicate the potential minimum, i.e., the contact angle with minimal free energy for given spontaneous curvature [μm−1]. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 110, 2216-2228DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.026) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions