Nuclear shapes for the critical point

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.
Advertisements

Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Pavel Stránský 29 th August 2011 W HAT DRIVES NUCLEI TO BE PROLATE? Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Alejandro.
Introduction to Molecular Orbitals
Emission of Scission Neutrons: Testing the Sudden Approximation N. Carjan Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux-Gradignan,CNRS/IN2P3 – Université Bordeaux.
1 Cold molecules Mike Tarbutt. 2 Outline Lecture 1 – The electronic, vibrational and rotational structure of molecules. Lecture 2 – Transitions in molecules.
Nucleon-pair transfer-intensities nuclear shape-phase transitions
Nuclear Tidal Waves Daniel Almehed Stefan Frauendorf Yongquin Gu Yang Sun.
NPSC-2003Gabriela Popa Microscopic interpretation of the excited K  = 0 +, 2 + bands of deformed nuclei Gabriela Popa Rochester Institute of Technology.
3D Schrodinger Equation
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition Zhipan Li School of Physical Science and Technology Southwest University 17th Nuclear Physics Workshop,
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
Chem 430 Particle on a ring 09/22/2011. Richard Feynman Quantum mechanics is based on assumptions and the wave-particle duality The nature of wave-particle.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Cross section for potential scattering
Odd nuclei and Shape Phase Transitions: the role of the unpaired fermion PRC 72, (2005); PRC 76, (2007); PRC 78, (2008); PRC 79,
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
P D S.E.1 3D Schrodinger Equation Simply substitute momentum operator do particle in box and H atom added dimensions give more quantum numbers. Can.
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Predoc’ school, Les Houches,september 2004
Lecture 20 Spherical Harmonics – not examined
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
Coupling between the lattice and internal nuclear degrees of freedom Peter Hagelstein 1 and Irfan Chaudhary 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Isospin mixing and parity- violating electron scattering O. Moreno, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra and J. M. Udías (IEM-CSIC Madrid and UCM Madrid) T.
Pavel Stránský Complexity and multidiscipline: new approaches to health 18 April 2012 I NTERPLAY BETWEEN REGULARITY AND CHAOS IN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.
K. P. Drumev Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Petrică Buganu, and Radu Budaca IFIN-HH, Bucharest – Magurele, Romania International Workshop “Shapes and Dynamics of Atomic Nuclei: Contemporary Aspects”
Q UANTUM CHAOS IN THE COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS OF NUCLEI Pavel Cejnar, Pavel Stránský, Michal Macek DPG Frühjahrstagung, Bochum 2009, Germany Institute.
MS310 Quantum Physical Chemistry
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Variational approach to isospin symmetry breaking in medium mass nuclei A. PETROVICI Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Algebraic collective model and its applications Gabriela Thiamová Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Institut National Polytechnique.
Emergent Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition Yu Zhang Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition 李志攀 西南大学物理科学与技术学院.
Quantum shape transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei. J. Jolie, Universität zu Köln.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
IV. Nuclear Structure Topics to be covered include:
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
Euclidean Dynamical Symmetry in Nuclear Shape Phase Transition
oblate prolate l=2 a20≠0, a2±1= a2±2= 0 Shape parameterization
20/30.
Probing Nuclear Skins through Density Form Factors
SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION APPROACH TO THE UNBINDING TRANSITION OF BIOMEMBRANES AND STRINGS : RIGOROUS STUDY M. BENHAMOU, R. El KINANI, H. KAIDI ENSAM, Moulay.
Open quantum systems.
Emmanuel Clément IN2P3/GANIL – Caen France
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
3D Schrodinger Equation
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011
Quantum Two.
Lecture 9 The Hydrogen Atom
EXOTIC NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENA the complex EXCITED VAMPIR approach
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
Quantum Two Body Problem, Hydrogen Atom
Nuclear Tidal Waves Daniel Almehed Stefan Frauendorf Yongquin Gu
Natalia Cieplicka-Oryńczak
20/30.
Effects of Deformation Parameter on Reaction Cross Section
Coupled-channel study of fine structure in the alpha decay of well-deformed nuclei Zhongzhou REN (任中洲) Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing,
FOR RANDOMLY PERTURBED Martin Dvořák, Pavel Cejnar
Presentation transcript:

Nuclear shapes for the critical point of the U(5) – SU(3) nuclear shape phase transition Petricӑ Buganu, Radu Budaca, Andreea Budaca Department of Theoretical Physics Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest – Magurele, Romania SSNET’18 International Conference on Shapes and Symmetries in Nuclei: From experiment to theory November 5 – 9, 2018, Gif sur Yvette, France

Content Brief Introduction and Motivation for the present study Bohr Hamiltonian with a sextic oscillator potential Nuclear shapes for the critical point of the phase transition from spherical vibrator [U(5)] to prolate rotor [SU(3)] Conclusions

Brief Introduction and Motivation for the present study R. F. Casten, Nature Physics 2 (2006) 811. Interacting Boson Model (IBM): F. Iachello, A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987. Bohr – Mottelson Model: A. Bohr, Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 26 (1952) No. 14; A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 27 (1953) No. 16.

Reviewed solutions of the Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian in: X(5): F. Iachello, Physical Review Letters 87 (2001) 052502. X(5) P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, and R. F. Casten, Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (2010) 2155. Reviewed solutions of the Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian in: L. Fortunato, Eur. Phys. J. A 26 (2005) 1. P. Buganu, L. Fortunato, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 43 (2016) 093003.

Bohr Hamiltonian with a sextic potential having simultaneous spherical and deformed minima Radial-like differential equation for the β variable for prolate deformed nuclei is: [F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 052502] A general sextic potential is used to introduce the barrier separating the two minima: R. Budaca, P. Buganu, A. I. Budaca, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 26 – 31. R. Budaca, A. I. Budaca, EPL 123 (2018) 42001. The eigenvalue can be scaled as follows: Due to the scaling property, one can start from the beginning with a potential of the form: Making the change of function , one obtains a new form for the β equation: The energies and the wave functions are obtained by a diagonalization using the basis states Jν are Bessel functions of the first kind, while αn are their zeros associated to the boundary conditions for a suitably chosen limiting value βw, which encompass the relevant part of the sextic potential. The boundary value βw is determined so that to achieve a satisfactory convergence for all considered energy states for a given dimension of the diagonalization basis. In this study, the parameters a and b, describing the associated effective potential, are fixed such that the two minima, separated by a barrier, to have the same minimum energy.

R. Budaca, A. I. Budaca, EPL 123 (2018) 42001. R. Budaca, P. Buganu, A R. Budaca, A. I. Budaca, EPL 123 (2018) 42001. R. Budaca, P. Buganu, A. I. Budaca, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 26 – 31.

Th. Exp. R. Budaca, A. I. Budaca, EPL 123 (2018) 42001..

Conclusions The influence had by the barrier for the critical point of the phase transition from spherical vibrator to axial rotor is investigated in the frame of the Bohr-Mottelson model using a sextic potential for the β variable. Moreover, the study goes beyond this particular situation by increasing considerably the height of the barrier. The parameters, describing the associated effective potential, are fixed such that the two minima, separated by barrier, to have the same minimum energy. The Hamiltonian is diagonalized in a basis of Bessel functions of the first kind, which in turn are solutions for the same problem but for an infinite square well potential. Analyzing the density distribution probabilities for the ground state and for the first 0+ excited state, but also the monopole transition matrix element between these two states, one can see how the barrier influence dramatically the deformation of the ground and excited states and moreover, the fact that these states could present shape coexistence, coexistence with mixing and fluctuations, respectively, depending on the height of the barrier. An experimental realization for the present model is found for 76Kr, which is known for its shape coexisting behavior.

[R. Budaca, P. Buganu, A. I. Budaca, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 26 - 31]