TOPSiDE – Concept of an EIC Detector and Ultra-Fast Silicon Sensors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Calorimeters Design Issues and Simulation Needs C.Woody Physics Department Brookhaven National Lab EIC Simulation Workshop Oct 9, 2012.
Edouard Kistenev for the PHENIX Collaboration Calorimetry based upgrade to PHENIX at RHIC CALOR 2012 Santa Fe, NM, June 4-8, 2012.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Calorimetry of the Future & the T3B Experiment Young Scientist Workshop – July 26 th 2011 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Status Report Fenfen An
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
Recent DHCAL Developments
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
(My personal) CALICE Report
Semi-Digital Hadronic CALorimeter
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
Studies with PandoraPFA
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Calorimetry for a CLIC experiment
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Experimental Particle Physics
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG 16 September 2002.
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Argonne National Laboratory
High Granularity Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
EIC Detectors: An Overview
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Experimental Particle Physics
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

TOPSiDE – Concept of an EIC Detector and Ultra-Fast Silicon Sensors José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Workshop on Pico-Second Timing Detectors for Physics and Medical Applictions University of Torino, Torino, Italy May 16 - 18, 2018 Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Electron-Ion Collider EIC Polarized ep, eA collider √s = 35 – 180 GeV Luminosity = 1034 cm-2s-1 Two possible sites Brookhaven → eRHIC Jefferson lab → JLEIC Scientific goals Study of perturbative & non-perturbative QCD Tomography (including transverse dimension) of the nucleon, nuclei Understanding the nucleon spin Discovery of gluon saturation… Construction to start in 2025 Nuclear physics community optimistic about its realization CD0 expected in FY2019 (making it a project) J. Repond: TOPSiDE

● To achieve the EIC physics goals we need 100% acceptance for all particles produced (acceptance is luminosity!) Excellent momentum/energy resolution PID for all particles (mostly driven by measurements of semi-inclusive DIS) → This requires full integration of the central, forward detectors and the beamline ● Particle list at MC hadron level ● Detector output We want a detector which provides the same type of information Particle ID Px Py Pz 11 (e-) -0.743 -0.636 -4.842 321 (K+) 0.125 0.798 6.618 -211 (π-) 0.232 0.008 3.776 0.151 -0.007 4.421 211 (π+) 0.046 0.410 2.995 111 (π0) -0.093 0.048 1.498 2112 (p) 0.115 -0.337 31.029 0.258 0.145 6.336 310 (KS0) 0.385 -0.408 3.226 DIS event Ee = 5 GeV Ep = 60 GeV J. Repond: TOPSiDE

TOPSiDE – 5D Concept Salient features Timing Optimized PID Silicon Detector for the EIC Salient features Symmetric design of the central detector (-3 < η < 3) Unlike the HERA detectors (ZEUS and H1) Electrons, photons and hadrons go everywhere Silicon tracking Vertex, outer, and forward/backward trackers Imaging calorimetry with very fine granularity Silicon ECAL and (gaseous or scintillator) HCAL Close to 4π coverage Ultra-fast silicon 10 ps time resolution for Time-of-Flight (PID) Superconducting solenoid 2.5 – 3 Tesla Outside the barrel calorimeters Measure E, x, y, z, t J. Repond: TOPSiDE

TOPSiDE – 5D Concept Salient features Timing Optimized PID Silicon Detector for the EIC Salient features Forward (hadron) direction (3 < eta < 5) Gaseous RICH for momenta between 10 and 50 GeV/c (within a cone of <100) Dipole or toroid for momentum measurement Ultra-fast silicon for tracking and TOF (PID for momenta up to 10 GeV/c) Backward (electron) direction (-3 > eta > -5) Crystal calorimeter for optimal energy resolution (scattered electron) Luminosity, polarization, low-Q2 tagging No additional Preshower, TOF, TRD, Cerenkov, muon chambers ← Not needed in front of the calorimeter J. Repond: TOPSiDE

TOPSiDE – 5D Concept Area of silicon ~1,400 m2 or $14M @ $1/cm2 (Compare: CMS HGCAL upgrade ~ 600 m2) J. Repond: TOPSiDE

TOPSiDE – 5D Concept The case for a hermetic (4π) hadron calorimeter The EIC is a precision machine (at the 1% level) Eneutral is small in average, but there are large fluctuations Electron ID is needed in the barrel region and is helped by a hadron calorimeter Background rejection requires hermeticity (detection of all particles) Kinematic reconstruction needs all hadrons → In particular for charged current events (no electron) → At medium/large x or low y (where the electron method fails → double angle) Special features/challenges of TOPSiDE ● Imaging calorimetry ● Ultra-fast silicon → next slides ● Tilted tracking sensors J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Imaging Calorimetry Replace Tower structure with very fine granularity (lateral and longitudinally) Few 1,000 channels → few 10,000,000 channels Option to reduce resolution on single channels to low-bit depth Technologies developed in past decades Silicon sensors with 1 x 1 cm2, 0.5 x 0.5 cm2 and 0.16 cm2 pixels Scintillator strips (4.5 x 0.5 cm2) or scintillator pads (3 x 3 cm2) Resistive Plate Chambers with 1 x 1 cm2 pads Micromegas and GEMs with 1 x 1 cm2 pads These technologies have been (mostly) validated J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Advantages of Imaging Calorimetry I Particle ID Electrons, muons, hadrons → (almost) trivial Muon system redundant Software compensation Typical calorimeters have e/h ≠ 1 Weighting of individual sub-showers possible → significant improvement in σEhad Leakage corrections Use longitudinal shower information to compensate for leakage Measure momentum of charged particles exiting calorimeter J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Advantages of Imaging Calorimetry II Gain monitoring Reconstruct track segments within hadronic showers Utilize MIP signal to monitor gain Assess local radiation damage Identify underlying events Multiparton interactions generate background of low energy particles This background can be identified and subtracted (LHC) Application of Particle Flow Algorithms (PFAs) Use PFAs to reconstruct the energy of hadronic jets J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Particle Flow Algorithms ECAL HCAL γ π+ KL Attempt to measure the energy/momentum of each particle in a hadronic jet with the detector subsystem providing the best resolution Particles in jets Fraction of energy Measured with Resolution [σ2] Charged 65 % Tracker Negligible Photons 25 % ECAL with 15%/√E 0.072 Ejet Neutral Hadrons 10 % ECAL + HCAL with 50%/√E 0.162 Ejet Confusion If goal is to achieve a resolution of 30%/√E → ≤ 0.242 Ejet 18%/√E PANDORA PFA based on ILD detector concept Factor ~2 better jet energy resolution than previously achieved EIC environment: particularly suited for PFAs, due to low particle multiplicity and low momenta J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Ultra – Fast Silicon Needed for 5D Concept Current status Future Kaons identified as kaons Pions identified as kaons Times smeared by 10 ps Ultra – Fast Silicon Needed for 5D Concept Implement in calorimeter and tracker for Particle ID (π – K – p separation) Resolution of 10 ps → separation up to ~ 7 GeV/c Current status Being developed based on the LGAD technology Best timing resolution about 27 ps Future Can we reach 10 ps? → Several groups worldwide arXiv:1608:08681

Argonne Silicon Development Testing Assembly of test bench for silicon sensors started → Acquired necessary tools: fast scope, HV, LV supplies, sources, clean space… Opening for a new postdoc → Testing of sensors to start in 1 – 2 months Participation in testing of sensors (ATLAS upgrade)in Fermilab test beam Simulation Simulation of HVCMOS sensors started Goal is to improve the timing resolution → Implementation of additional gain layer Time distribution system Timing jitter of < 10 ps required Looking into RF technologies Collaboration with Argonne HEP (ATLAS), Geneva, Santa Cruz, Fermilab, Kansas, Torino…

Silicon Tracker: Considering tilted sensors Taken from Peter Kostka and Alessandro Polini (LHeC studies) Non Tilted Sensor Planes Tilted Sensor Planes More hits, 25% less material (in X0) To be implemented in TOPSiDE simulation J. Repond: TOPSiDE

TOPSiDE in Simulation Starting point SiD detector concept developed by ILC community TOPSiDE Some initial modifications from SiD Longer barrel, lower B-field, shallower calorimeters No performance tuning yet (detector optimized for |η|< 3.0) Simulation Entire chain available → Event generation, GEANT4, digitization, reconstruction, event display, analysis Introduced DD4Hep → One geometry file for simulation, digitization, reconstruction, analysis Ongoing replacement of parts difficult to maintain/develop → digitization, tracking → generic tracking Changes to geometry → Development of workflow for ‘rapid detector iteration’ J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Simulation Studies Single Particle Resolutions Photon energy resolution Single Particle Resolutions Generated photons with 1 – 30 GeV Spread over most of solid angle TOF PID using silicon with 10 ps resolution Determination of TOF Requirement Using timing information in tracker and ECAL For each track fit time versus path length Comparison of true and reconstructed F2 Reconstruction of the F2 Structure Function Use MSTW PDF to generate DIS events Use CTEQ PDF to correct for acceptance (problem with CTEQ phase space) Validation of entire simulation tool chain J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Number of channels ECAL Silicon pixels with an area of 0.25 cm2 Total area about 1,400 m2 → 51M channels → Resolution per pixel ~14-bit HCAL Scintillator pads with an area of 3 x 3 cm2 with 14-bit/pad resolution or RPCs with 1 x 1 cm2 readout pads with 1-bit/pad resolution Total area about m2 → 3M (Scintillator) -> 26M (RPC) channels Tracker/RICH → ~4M channels Total Of the order of 58 – 81 M channels This is only a prototype J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Conclusions TOPSiDE Based on silicon Electron Method Conclusions TOPSiDE Based on silicon Features ultra-fast silicon, imaging calorimetry → 5D concept Completely hermetic Advantages of TOPSiDE Simplicity of design (limited number of subsystems) Based on silicon, which is robust (no gas, high voltages, stable operation, radiation hardness) Excellent kinematic reconstruction Excellent background rejection (hermeticity) Minimal ‘dead’ material in front of calorimeters No additional TOF, TRD, Cerenkov, muon system Provides list of particles, similar to MC Next steps Complete revamping of simulation chain Implement TOF PID Tune ECAL sampling structure Develop Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors J. Repond: TOPSiDE

Backup Slides J. Repond: TOPSiDE