Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Single-Neuron Correlates of Atypical Face Processing in Autism
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects
GABAergic Modulation of Visual Gamma and Alpha Oscillations and Its Consequences for Working Memory Performance  Diego Lozano-Soldevilla, Niels ter Huurne,
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Somatosensory Precision in Speech Production
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Mental Imagery Changes Multisensory Perception
Mismatch Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
Sing-Hang Cheung, Fang Fang, Sheng He, Gordon E. Legge  Current Biology 
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Human Hippocampal Dynamics during Response Conflict
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Tobias Staudigl, Simon Hanslmayr  Current Biology 
Deciphering Cortical Number Coding from Human Brain Activity Patterns
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Vebjørn Ekroll, Bilge Sayim, Ruth Van der Hallen, Johan Wagemans 
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Roberto Cecere, Geraint Rees, Vincenzo Romei  Current Biology 
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Overgeneralization in Anxiety
Mathilde Bonnefond, Ole Jensen  Current Biology 
Acetylcholine Mediates Behavioral and Neural Post-Error Control
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Olaf Blanke, Mel Slater, Andrea Serino  Neuron 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Decoding the Yellow of a Gray Banana
Einat S. Peled, Zachary L. Newman, Ehud Y. Isacoff  Current Biology 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Feeling numbness for someone else's finger
Dissociable Effects of Salience on Attention and Goal-Directed Action
Masaya Hirashima, Daichi Nozaki  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages R877-R878 (October 2007)
Active Interpersonal Touch Gives Rise to the Social Softness Illusion
Silvia Convento, Md. Shoaibur Rahman, Jeffrey M. Yau  Current Biology 
Self and Other in the Human Motor System
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects
Bodily Illusions Modulate Tactile Perception
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Evelina Fedorenko, John Duncan, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Cooling the Thermal Grill Illusion through Self-Touch
Kazumichi Matsumiya, Satoshi Shioiri  Current Biology 
Compensatory Neural Reorganization in Tourette Syndrome
Sharing Social Touch in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex
J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan 
Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Spatiotemporal Neural Pattern Similarity Supports Episodic Memory
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
A Goal Direction Signal in the Human Entorhinal/Subicular Region
Responsibility Assignment in Redundant Systems
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition Olaf Blanke, Polona Pozeg, Masayuki Hara, Lukas Heydrich, Andrea Serino, Akio Yamamoto, Toshiro Higuchi, Roy Salomon, Margitta Seeck, Theodor Landis, Shahar Arzy, Bruno Herbelin, Hannes Bleuler, Giulio Rognini  Current Biology  Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages 2681-2686 (November 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Lesion Analysis in Study 1 (A) Lesion overlap analysis for the FoP group revealed three regions where overlap was maximal. These regions were as follows: temporoparietal cortex (five patients; Brodmann area 22; Montreal Neurological Institute [MNI] x = 58, y = −51, z = 22), frontoparietal cortex (five patients; Brodmann area 7, MNI x = −32, y = −54, z = 62), and insula (five patients; Brodmann area 48; MNI x = −43, y = 8, z = −4). The color scale indicates the following: blue represents three patients, green represents four patients, and red represents five patients. Five patients had a right lesion, and seven patients had a left lesion; for analysis, all lesions were projected onto the left hemisphere. (B) Maximal lesion overlap for the control group. The color scale indicates the following: green represents four patients, yellow represents five patients, and red represents six patients. Five control patients had a right lesion, and seven control patients had a left lesion; for analysis, all lesions were projected onto the left hemisphere. Current Biology 2014 24, 2681-2686DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Master-Slave Robotic System and Tactile Full-Body Illusion in Study 2 (A) A schematic view of the master haptic interface (Phantom Omni; SensAbleTechnologies) and the slave robot are shown (see Movie S1; Figure S2; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Position of the slave robot is controlled by the master robot, resulting in a total correspondence between the movements of the two devices (intrinsic delay < 1 ms). The participant moved the master robot via his right index finger (that was attached to the robot), which actuated the movements of the slave robot that applied touches to the participant’s back. In order to test the impact of robotically controlled sensorimotor conflicts to induce changes in bodily self-consciousness, we tested the following four experimental conditions: (2 × 2 factorial design) (1) synchronous with force feedback, (2) asynchronous with force feedback, (3) synchronous with no force feedback, and (4) asynchronous with no force feedback. During the asynchronous conditions, the movements performed at the master device were delayed by 500 ms before being transmitted to the slave device (factor delay: synchronous or asynchronous). A “virtual back” in front of participants was created in order to have a mechanical stop (occurring synchronously or asynchronously) to the touch that the participant received on the back (factor force feedback: force or no force). (B) Ratings for illusory touch and control questions are shown. Note that illusory self-touch is significantly larger in the synchronous versus asynchronous condition (p < 0.01) and also significantly larger than ratings of the control items (p < 0.01). (C) Participants showed a drift in self-location toward the virtual back (toward the fingertip) that was larger during the synchronous than asynchronous conditions (p < 0.01) and was larger in the condition with versus without somatosensory force feedback to the participants’ fingertip (p < 0.05) (Movie S2). Self-location was quantified using the mental ball throwing task, during which participants were asked to estimate (by pressing a button) the time that a ball they were holding in their hands would take to reach the wall if they were to throw it (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The condition in which five subjects spontaneously noted a FoP is indicated with an arrow. Error bars show the SEM. Current Biology 2014 24, 2681-2686DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Robotically Induced FoP in Studies 3 and 4 (A) FoP questions, touched-by-other questions, illusory self-touch questions, and control questions are shown. As predicted, during asynchronous stimulation, participants experienced another person standing behind them (FoP; p < 0.01), touching them (touched by other; p < 0.01). As in study 2, synchronous stimulation induced illusory self-touch (p < 0.01). (B) A significant difference in self-location was found between the asynchronous (backward direction, associated with FoP) and synchronous condition in study 3 (p < 0.05; Movie S3). (C) Number of people (0–4) that participants judged as being close to them (the following question was asked: “how many people do you feel close to you?”; person numerosity task) during synchronous and asynchronous sensorimotor stimulation. As predicted, participants reported a significantly higher number of people during the FoP condition (asynchronous) than the synchronous condition (p < 0.01). Note that during the experiment, nobody was ever close to the participants. Error bars show the SEM. Current Biology 2014 24, 2681-2686DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions