IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONET Problem Scope and Requirements draft-kniveton-monet-requirements-00 T.J. Kniveton Alper Yegin IETF March 2002.
Advertisements

Mobile IP How Mobile IP Works? Agenda What problems does Mobile IP solve? Mobile IP: protocol overview Scope Requirements Design goals.
PMIPv6 Localized Routing Problem Statement draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-ro-ps-01.txt Marco Liebsch, Sangjin Jeong, Qin Wu IETF75 - Stockholm NetExt WG, 30.
Mobile IPv6: An Overview Dr Martin Dunmore, Lancaster University.
Deployment of Existing Mobility Protocols in DMM Scenario draft-liu-dmm-practice-of-deployment-00 draft-chan-dmm-framework-gap-analysis-05.
MIP Extensions: FMIP & HMIP
1Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date University of Twente On the Security of the Mobile IP Protocol Family Ulrike Meyer and Hannes Tschofenig.
Mobile IPv6 趨勢介紹 1. Mobile IP and its Variants Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) – MIPv4 – Low-Latency Handover for MIPv4 (FMIPv4) – Regional Registration for MIPv4.
Distributed mobility management in the context of the MEDIEVAL project MEVICO Final Seminar, part 2 23 rd November 2012 Carlos J. Bernardos, UC3M
DISTRIBUTED/DYNAMIC MOBILITY MANAGEMENT(DMM) PROBLEM STATEMENT Dapeng Liu (China Mobile) Hidetoshi Yokota (KDDI) Charles E. Perkins (Tellabs) Melia Telemaco.
1 © NOKIA NSIS MIPv6 FW/ November 8 th 2004 Mobile IPv6 - NSIS Interaction for Firewall traversal draft-thiruvengadam-nsis-mip6-fw-01 S. Thiruvengadam.
Mobile IP Overview: Standard IP Standard IP Evolution of Mobile IP Evolution of Mobile IP How it works How it works Problems Assoc. with it Problems Assoc.
Mobile IP.
NEtwork MObility By: Kristin Belanger. Contents Introduction Introduction Mobile Devices Mobile Devices Objectives Objectives Security Security Solution.
Cellular IP: Proxy Service Reference: “Incorporating proxy services into wide area cellular IP networks”; Zhimei Jiang; Li Fung Chang; Kim, B.J.J.; Leung,
MultiMob WG. Potential future work (draft-von-hugo-multimob-future-work-02) IETF 78, Maastricht / Dirk von Hugo (Deutsche Telekom), Hitoshi.
81st IETF, Quebec Citydraft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 A PMIPv6-based solution for Distributed Mobility Management draft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 Carlos.
Mobile IP Performance Issues in Practice. Introduction What is Mobile IP? –Mobile IP is a technology that allows a "mobile node" (MN) to change its point.
Mobile IP Seamless connectivity for mobile computers.
Mobile IP, PMIP, FMC, and a little bit more
1 MultimEDia transport for mobIlE Video AppLications 9 th Concertation Meeting Brussels, 13 th February 2012 MEDIEVAL Consortium.
Introducing Reliability and Load Balancing in Home Link of Mobile IPv6 based Networks Jahanzeb Faizan, Mohamed Khalil, and Hesham El-Rewini Parallel, Distributed,
National Institute Of Science & Technology Mobile IP Jiten Mishra (EC ) [1] MOBILE IP Under the guidance of Mr. N. Srinivasu By Jiten Mishra EC
Internet Goes Mobile Alper Yegin KIOW 2003 at APNIC 16 August 19th, Seoul, Korea.
Multimob possible future work I’: dmm multicast D. von Hugo Contributions from S. Figueiredo, S. Jeon, D. Liu IETF-83, Paris 1.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Distributed Mobility Management using IEEE Date Submitted: March 16, 2011.
Seamless Handover Scheme for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Ju-Eun Kang, LGDACOM CORPORATION/Research Institute of Technology, Korea Dong-Won Kum, Yang Li, and You-Ze.
NEtwork MObility (NEMO) Houcheng Lee. Main Idea NEMO works by moving the mobility functionality from Mobile IP mobile nodes to a mobile router. The router.
A Route Optimization Scheme Based on Roaming in PMIPv6 (pROR) S.-s. Oh, H.-Y. Choi, and S.-G. Min 1 in Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS.
1 Motorola PMIPv4 Call Flows: Bearer Setup with Dual Anchoring Parviz YeganiVojislav VuceticAlmon Tang (408) (732) (847)
1 Route Optimization for Large Scale Network Mobility Assisted by BGP Feriel Mimoune, Farid Nait-Abdesselam, Tarik Taleb and Kazuo Hashimoto GLOBECOM 2007.
1 Evaluation of PMIPv6 Base Multicast Support Drafts Stig Venaas Behcet Sarikaya November 2009 Multimob WG IETF 76.
1 Mobility Support for IP-Based Network Professor : Sheau-Ru Tong Reporter : M 李 思儀 M 林 濟斌 IEEE Communications Magazine October 2005 Jie.
PMIPv6 Route Optimization Protocol draft-qin-mipshop-pmipro-00.txt Alice Qin Andy Huang Wenson Wu Behcet Sarikaya.
Santhosh Rajathayalan ( ) Senthil Kumar Sevugan ( )
Mobile IP 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 VoIP 특론 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 2 References  Tutorial: Mobile IP
Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement Speaker: Jong-Ru Lin
REGIONAL COLLEGE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY.
Network Mobility (NEMO) Advanced Internet 2004 Fall
21-07-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Network based Distributed Mobility Approach Date Submitted: July,
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary) 28 Sep
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: srho Title: Consideration for MGW discovery Date Submitted: July 18, 2012 Presented at IEEE.
Multicast Routing Optimization Juan-Carlos Zúñiga Luis M. Contreras Carlos J. Bernardos Seil Jeon Younghan Kim MULTIMOB WG, July
: MobileIP. : r Goal: Allow machines to roam around and maintain IP connectivity r Problem: IP addresses => location m This is important for efficient.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: May 14, 2009 Presented at IEEE session.
PMIPv6 multicasting support using native infrastructure draft-sijeon-multimob-direct-routing-pmip6-00.txt Seil Jeon and Younghan Kim 80 th IETF, March.
IETF-70 in Vancouver1 STANDARDIZATION OF SOLUTIONS Behcet Sarikaya Huawei Research.
Software-Defined Networking in Heterogeneous Radio Access Networks TNC 2014 Conference, Dublin Hao Yu, DTU/NORDUnet May 21, 2014.
th IETF NEMO WG 1 NEMO RO Problem Space Prepared for 55 th IETF By Pascal Thubert (Cisco), Ng Chan Wah & Takeshi Tanaka (Panasonic)
Mobile IP THE 12 TH MEETING. Mobile IP  Incorporation of mobile users in the network.  Cellular system (e.g., GSM) started with mobility in mind. 
Network-based Localized Mobility Management
Authors: Jiang Xie, Ian F. Akyildiz
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab
Distributed Mobility Management for Future 5G Networks : Overview and Analysis of Existing Approaches IEEE Wireless Communications January 2015 F. Giust,
Security Issues With Mobile IP
Route Optimization of Mobile IP over IPv4
Support for Flow bindings in MIPv6 and NEMO
Fast Handover for Multicast in Proxy Mobile IPv6
Fast Handover For Multicast in Proxy Mobile IPv6
with distributed anchor routers
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary)
H. Anthony Chan, Unified framework and DMM gap analysis draft-chan-dmm-framework-gapanalysis H. Anthony Chan,
Enhanced Mobility Anchoring
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: srho
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
NETLMM 및 IETF 이동성기술 표준화 동향
Mobile IP Presented by Team : Pegasus Kishore Reddy Yerramreddy Jagannatha Pochimireddy Sampath k Bavipati Spandana Nalluri Vandana Goyal.
Network-based and Client-based DMM solutions using Mobile IP mechanisms draft-bernardos-dmm-cmip-07 draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-08 draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-09.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
Presentation transcript:

IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER Title: Distributed mobility management Date Submitted: Authors or Sources: H Anthony Chan Abstract: Introduction to distributed mobility management 21-10-0195-00

Centralized mobility anchors Current mobile networks are hierarchical, and existing mobility solutions are deployed with centralized mobility anchoring E.g. HA in MIPv6/DSMIPv6, LMA in PMIPv6, GGSN in 3GPP GPRS/UMTS SAE PMIP GGSN P-GW LMA SGSN SGSN S-GW S-GW MAG MAG 21-10-0195-00

Existing technology Terminology: Network: hierarchical versus flattened Mobility management: centralized versus distributed Existing mobile networks are hierarchical. Existing mobility solutions deployed with centralized mobility anchoring have some problems or limitations. 21-10-0195-00

Problems and limitations 1. Routing via a centralized anchor leads to non-optimized routes. 2. Routes are set up for a large number of mobile hosts even though the majority are not moving : scalability and performance. 3. Mobility contexts are maintained even if a mobile host will not actually move, resulting in wasted resources. In addition, maintaining mobility contexts in a central entity has scalability issue. 4. Single point of failure in the centralized architecture 5. As the volume of wireless data traffic continues to increase exponentially, the revenue growth is falling far behind. Hierarchical architecture is more costly than the more flattened network, so that mobility management deployment with distributed architecture is needed. 21-10-0195-00

Non-optimized routing problem Packets between MN and CN need to tunnel between MAG and LMA, even when MN is far from home network but is close to CN Home network with LMA Visited network with MAG LMA: Local mobility anchor = Home agent (HA) + PMIP function MN: mobile node CN: correspondent node MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Possible solution: Copy LMA in many networks HoA’s are anycast addresses Solves triangle routing problem by using the LMA closest to MN. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-nemo-global-haha-02 Yet, synchronizing the location information among the LMA’s in real time is a challenge. LMA LMA LMA LMA LMA MAG MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Distributed Mobility Anchors LMA functions: mobility routing (MR) + location management (LM) + HoA allocation. Only copy the MR function in different networks. LM MR MR MR MR MR LM: Location management MR: Mobility routing MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Distributed Mobility Anchors LMA functions: mobility routing (MR) + location management (LM) + HoA allocation. Only copy the MR function in different networks. LM MR (H-MA) MR (V-MA) MR (V-MA) MR (V-MA / D-MA) MR (V-MA / O-MA) H-MA: Home MA: MR + LM V-MA: Visited MA: MR only O-MA: Originating MA D-MA: Destination MA MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Receiving packets First packet Subsequent packet: Optimized route H-MA V-MA V-MA D-MA O-MA MN CN H-MA V-MA V-MA D-MA O-MA MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Route optimization algorithm Whenever a node is the end of an incoming tunnel segment and the beginning of the outgoing tunnel segment for the same packet, the node knows optimization is possible. The node simply informs the start of the incoming tunnel segment to tunnel future packets to the end of the outgoing tunnel segment. 21-10-0195-00

Sending packets to another mobile node to fixed node H-MA V-MA V-MA D-MA O-MA MN1 MN2 H-MA V-MA V-MA D-MA O-MA MN CN 21-10-0195-00

Further optimization Between 2 mobile nodes H-MA V-MA V-MA D-MA O-MA MN1 MN2 21-10-0195-00

Thank you 21-10-0195-00