CANADA UNITED STATES British Columbia Washington Aldergove

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Border Infrastructure Project Updates Transportation Border Working Group – November , Ottawa, Ontario.
Advertisements

1 CBSA BORDER INFRASTUCTURE Border Infrastructure Coordination Session November 1, 2011.
Pacific Corridor Enterprise Council K. David Andersson President February 16, 2006 Presentation Vancouver Cross Border Regions Roundtable.
The International Mobility and Trade Corridor Project Gordon Rogers Deputy Director Whatcom Council of Governments TBWG Vancouver, BC December 4, 2002.
Transportation Border Working Group Montreal October 22 and 23, 2013 CBSA Project Update.
Qu é bec-New York Regional Workshop Report Ministère des Transports du Québec / New York State Dept. of Transportation TBWG Montréal, Québec October 25,
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
TBWG Spring 2011 Meeting Minneapolis, Mn EASTERN BORDER TRANSPORTATION COALITION UPDATE.
– Toronto Alicia Nolan – Co-Chair - FHWA Allan Wilson – Co-Chair – Transport Canada Border Infrastructure Coordination Subcommittee (BICSC)
Olympics-related Travel at the BC - WA Border & through Northwest Washington State April 29, 2004 TBWG Washington, DC.
Border Information Flow Architecture Pilot Project Funding Program Transportation Border Working Group, Québec October 27, 2010.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Wait Time Measurement Technology.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Regional Border Infrastructure Update SR 539 / Lynden-Aldergrove Port of Entry Improvements Todd Carlson Planning and Engineering Services Canada-United.
BORDER FREIGHT BACKGROUND, TRENDS, POLICIES AND BARRIERS Washington State Freight Advisory Committee SeaTac, June 17, 2013 Gordon Rogers, Deputy Director.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Northbound Border Wait Times Validation SR 543 Pacific Highway Port of Entry Transportation Border Working Group Todd Carlson Planning and Engineering.
Cascade Gateway Border ATIS Hugh Conroy Whatcom Council of Governments TBWG Boston, MA April 13, 2010 Peace Arch, Blaine, Washington.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Technology Subcommittee November Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.
Border Master Plan Laredo, Texas July 28, 2010  Laredo District  Coahuila  Nuevo León  Tamaulipas.
Border Wait-Time Emissions Analysis Study 1 Project Briefing Travis Black Federal Highway Administration November 14, 2012.
October 22, 2013 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Transportation Planning Branch Systems Analysis and Forecasting Office Rob Tardif Ontario Update on.
OAA PRESENTATION February 7, WELCOME AND TEAM INTRODUCTIONS Dave Dennis – ODOT Office of Aviation Jim Bryant – ODOT Office of Aviation Chuck Dyer.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Induced Travel: Definition, Forecasting Process, and A Case Study in the Metropolitan Washington Region A Briefing Paper for the National Capital Region.
Rebuilding Rhode Island’s Aging Bridges with Truck Tolling
7 Training Employees What Do I Need to Know?
Economic Development Research Group, Inc.
Lecture #8 Thursday, September 15, 2016 Textbook: Section 4.4
Lessons learned from Metro Vancouver
ITS Session TBWG, Boston, April 13-14, 2010
T Trade in Services Pilot project in
Bell Ringer List five reasons why you think that some new businesses have almost immediate success while others fail miserably.
Consultancy on International Trade in Services Statistics
STATUS OF GSA NORTHERN BORDER PROJECTS
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
The Management Process
An Inland Port in Salt Lake County
Part C and 619 Involvement with Integrated Early Childhood Data
Multi-state Corridor Pooled Fund Program
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board Quarterly Meeting
Sectors or Sectorial Expertise?
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
Border Crossing Best Practices Guidebook
The uses of data in Fisheries Management
Comparative Essay Overview
Business and Management Research
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Prepared by: Gregory D. Erhardt University of Kentucky Flavia Tsang
Developing Resilient Freight Systems
The Aggregate Expenditures Model The beginning of the study of Macroeconomic Models and Fiscal Policy Please listen to the audio as you work through.
Interstate Operations Study Planning + Simulation
Experiments and Observational Studies
Writing the Document Based Question (DBQ) Essay
On the Horizon: Excellence in Governance
Experiences with On-Board Mass Monitoring in Australia Gavin Hill General Manager, Strategic Development Transport Certification Australia.
Questions from Tuesday 11/15/16
Business and Management Research
BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP Technology Evaluation and Deployment
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Arizona-Mexico Economic Indicators
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
CHAPTER 4 - ORGANISATION AND JOB DESIGN
Martin Aldcroft, Senior Manager Strategic Support Unit 3 July 2019
How can DTM Multi-Sectoral Location Assessment be useful for
Presentation transcript:

CANADA UNITED STATES British Columbia Washington Aldergove Abbotsford-Huntingdon Pacific Highway Lynden Sumas Co-Chair Hoff asked me to help round out today’s session with an update on an IMTC project that, honestly, I hadn’t gotten around to. A comparative review of data sources covering different sources of data that agencies and stakeholders use for what is, essentially, the same information. So – a two for one deal. I finally get started on a small project we’ve had on our list for over a year and I have a hopefully intriguing data-topic for this session. So, today’s installment, cross-border commercial vehicle count data. What’s it good for? Without answering that question directly, I’ll just say that, people in this room us it for: Basic knowledge of demand and trends Internal agency allocation of resources Base counts for expanding related information obtained through sample surveys (commodity, origin-destination, vehicle type, etc.) Actual volumes relative to operational performance metrics Allocation of funding in programs like Coordinated Border Infrastructure (CBI) Program While we’ve understood historic truck volume data to be a bit inconsistent for many years, a project we did a couple of years ago put a finer edge on the need for a coordinated understanding of the observable discrepancies. Point out Aldergrove on this slide and note the IMTC Subgroup / WCOG study. Washington UNITED STATES

A couple of years ago – IMTC participating agencies decided to form a subgroup to compile information about the Aldergove-Lynden port-of-entry. Prompted by CBSA’s announcement of an upcoming station-replacement and somewhat concurrent assessment that the facilities and operational capabilities of the facility were inadequate to continue accepting commercial vehicles. So that a more complete understanding of the crossings relationship to regional trade and regional and national economies could be fully considered in future decisions about this crossing (like the degree to which the preservation of future commercial options should be pursued), WCOG, working with the subcommittee, undertook a technical assessment, relying on past data collection efforts, existing sources of count data and commodity data, origin-destination data, surveys with local carrier firms, and regional economic data. In putting together the early chapters of this report, I wanted to establish some baselines… like showing the relative shares of regional cross-border traffic. In doing this I wanted to quantify a KNOWN influence – the permit-port operation at Lynden Aldergrove. Even though the data could show that condition. There was more discrepancy than I could easily explain. Review slide: Pac Hway, balances well Aldergrove NB higher then Lynden SB – yes, that’s what we understood to be a result of the operations policy Sumas SB higher than Huntingdon NB – yes… but Why is the DIFFERENCE between the two different? It should be about the same. Looking at it another way…. (NEXT SLIDE)

CANADA UNITED STATES British Columbia Washington Aldergove Abbotsford-Huntingdon Pacific Highway Lynden Sumas I assumed Pac Hwy was sufficiently balanced in vehicle flow in both directions. To control for the policy based diversions (permit port), combined the directional totals for the other two ports to the east. Washington UNITED STATES

Cascade Gateway Truck Volumes – Finding a Balance So, if you’re willing to go along with me and conclude that, in general, Pac Hwy is balanced out, AND, that there is not anything going on to significantly violate the principal – what goes up must come down – then we can conclude that either southbound Lynden-Sumas combined counts are high OR Aldergrove—Abbotsford-Huntingdon are low. Well, this was the impetus for a small project – to stop wondering about this stuff and start asking structured questions of the agencies that actually collect the data. Pacific Highway Lynden-Aldergrove Sumas-Huntingdon

2011 Pacific Highway One-way Truck Counts by Data Source

2011 Pacific Highway One-way Truck Counts by Data Source

2011 Pacific Highway One-way Truck Counts by Data Source

2011 Pacific Highway One-way Truck Counts by Data Source