Annual Progress Report & State Plan Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES Special Education Department Tracy Cartas, Director of Special Education Felipe Arroyo, AT Supervisor.
Advertisements

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
1.  Three types: ◦ Financial Loans, Other - Provide AT, Other – Savings NOTE: Totals exceed 56 as some states report multiple State Financing programs.
Title III National Professional Development (NPD) Program Grantee Performance Reporting: A Webinar for FY2011 and FY2012 Grantees February 28, 2013 Prepared.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
1.  Decrease data element confusion  Increase data reporting consistency  Eliminate duplicative data (AFP/Telework)  Eliminate data elements not useful.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
The Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as amended & Statewide AT Programs.
1.  Data comes from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008 (FY 2008).  Sources include: State Plans, Annual Progress Reports, UIC data system.  The.
Assistive Technology in the Educational Setting Ed Computers and Technology in Special Education.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
*With some FY2008 Comparisons 1.  FY09 data comes from October 1, 2008 to September 30,  FY08 data comes from October 1, 2007 to September 30,
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES Special Education Department Presenters Assistive Technology Team.
N I D R R National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Web-based Data Collection for AT Act Programs: Data from FY01 Annual Reports Presentation.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
0 State Financing: General A state financing activity is approved as part of your State Plan for AT. Examples include: financial loan programs financial.
0 Training: General Training is not public awareness – training has more depth and breadth. If the purpose is to create awareness, the training session.
0 Performance Measures: General Two survey instruments are provided: one for the “access” measure, and one for the “acquisition” measure. Two survey instruments.
The Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as amended & Statewide AT Programs.
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
UNDERSTANDING PERFORMANCE MEASURES Performance Measure Requirements Performance Measure Development Targets – Met/Not Met Strategies to Increase Performance.
THE FINAL ACTS OF THE ITU PLENIPOTENTIARY CONFERENCE, MARRAKESH, MOROCCO 2002 PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON LABOUR AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES.
READY FOR FY15 DATA? Diane Cordry Golden July 2014.
O S E R S Proposed Assistive Technology Act Data Collection June 12, 2006 Jeremy Buzzell Program Specialist Rehabilitation Services Administration Office.
Revisions to the Quality Indicators Manual for Device Loan Nov 10, :00 PM - 4:00 PM EST.
Legal Aspects of Special Education And Social Foundations The Technology-Related Assistance Act (Tech Act)
0 Device Reutilization: General Device reutilization includes:  device exchange  program serves as intermediary  program does NOT serve as intermediary.
0 Training: General Training is not public awareness – training has more depth and breadth. If the purpose is to create awareness, the training session.
CHALLENGING DATA ELEMENTS CAN WE FIND SOLUTIONS? Basis for Current Data Element Problems with the Data Element Discussion – Ideas to Revise Concensus/Summary.
Data Reporting FY 2015 Planning for FY 2016 Diane Cordry Golden Vance Dhooge.
Changes to the EPA Brownfields Assessment, Revolving Loan Fund and Cleanup (ARC) Grant Proposal Guidelines May 6, 2008 Presented by: Megan Quinn US EPA.
The Assistive Technology Act Legislative History and the Basics of the 2004 Law.
Slide 1 Assistive Technology Guidelines for Kentucky Schools AT Training Team.
Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.
The Assistive Technology Act
We Make Housing Affordable
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
A program of the Institute on Disabilities at Temple University
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
A program of the Institute on Disabilities at Temple University
Considering ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in the IEP Process
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Intent to Apply/Pre-Application Guidance
The Value of Person-Centered Planning
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
Data Reporting FY 2015 Planning for FY 2016
Diane Cordry Golden March 2017
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Arkansas Health Care Reform Task Force – ID/DD Wait List
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Good Morning!!! Kathy Adams OTL, ATP Maine CITE, Director
Data Update: APR, State Plan & much more (including homework)
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
Regional Transit Formula Fund Policies Section 5307/5340 – Urbanized Formula Fund Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Section 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities.
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
Funding Opportunity Announcement Number: HRSA
Demo Loan Community of Practice: Update
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
The Assistive Technology Act
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Data Fidelity Preconference
Assistive Technology Laws
Assistive Technology Laws
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Federal/State Structure
Lesson 3.2 Product Planning
The Assistive Technology Act
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

Annual Progress Report & State Plan Update Dr. Diane Cordry Golden March 2019

Topics Proposed Updates to Annual Progress Report (for FY 2020-2022) State Plan for FY 2018-2020 Update Historical Data Highlights/Trends

Updates to next APR (FY2020-2022) Proposed revisions targeted to -- Address areas of data inconsistency Clarify categorizations/taxonomy application Eliminate data elements or exclusions rarely used or prone to misunderstanding Revised Instruction Manual Updated AT Type Taxonomy Eliminated duplication between APR and Instruction Manual

Proposed Update – State Financing Require “investment” description for partnership financial loans reported with no interest buy-down or guarantee State AT Program must have some kind of subsidy or other “investment” in partnership loans reported in APR Most common is low-interest rate (prime or less) obtained via written agreement If loans are not low-interest, must provide description of subsidy/investment

Proposed Update - Exchange Eliminate option for automatic exclusion of all exchange recipients from performance measure Programs will need some kind of intermediary role to collect performance measure data and report exchange events Can exclude any reuse event (including exchange) when collecting performance measure is not appropriate because recipient cannot legitimately respond because they have legal obligation to provide AT (e.g. VR, IDEA, Medicaid, etc.)

Proposed Update – Device Loan Separate decision-making from other purposes in Borrower Type and AT Device Type Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number of Loans 1. Assist in decision making (device trial or evaluation) Access Performance Measure 2. Serve as loaner during device repair or while waiting for funding Acquisition Performance Measure 3. Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 4. Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity Total System-generated

Proposed Update – Device Loan Separate decision-making from other purposes in Borrower Type and AT Device Type Number of Borrowers by Type equals Purpose Type of Individual or Entity as Borrower Decision-making Number of Borrowers All other Purposes Number of Borrowers Total Borrowers Individuals with disabilities   System-generated Family members, etc. Representatives of Education Representatives of Employment Representatives of Health, etc. Representatives of Community Living Representatives of Technology Total = 1 = 2+3+4

Proposed Update – Device Loan (cont.) AT Type total greater than or equal to purpose Type of AT Device Decision-making Number of Devices All other Purposes Total Vision System-generated Hearing Speech communication   Learning, cognition, and developmental Mobility, seating and positioning Daily living Environmental adaptations Vehicle modification and transportation Computers and related Recreation, sports, and leisure ≥ 1 ≥ 2+3+4

Proposed Update - Demonstration Add separate decision-maker identification to participant data Each demo event has one AT type and one decision-maker participant type identified who completes performance measure Type of Participant Decision-maker Participant All Other Participants Total Individuals with disabilities   System-generated Family members, guardians, etc Representatives of Education Representatives of Employment Representatives of Health, etc Rep of Community Living Representatives of Technology System-generated = Access PM

Proposed Update - Leveraged Funding Delete Section B. AT Act authorized activity not included in State Plan (no APR data reported) Add selection for data reported/not reported In State Plan, data not reported needs narrative Use notes to report activity not in State Plan and why Fund Source (select one) Amount Use of Funds (select one) Data Reported (select one) Federal Public/State Agency State Appropriations Private   State Financing Training Reuse Technical Assistance Demonstration Public Awareness/I&A Device Loan Yes, data was reported in previous section of APR No, data was not reported in previous section of APR and an explanation is provided option to repeat row data

Proposed Update Acquisition Performance Measure Maintain current area calculations & eliminate 75% targets Add new overall calculation with ACL target = 85% Unable to afford or otherwise obtain AT without State AT Program Response Education Employment Comm Living Total Could only afford through the AT program AT only available through the AT program AT available through other programs but the system was too complex or wait time was too long None of the above Non-respondent Performance Same % New % ACL Performance Target 85% Met/Not Met Met/Not

Proposed Update Access Performance Measure Maintain current area calculations & eliminate 70% targets Add new overall calculation for ACL target = 90% Positive decision-making through State AT Program Response Education Employment Community Living Total Decided that an AT device/service will meet needs Decided that an AT device/service will not meet needs Have not made a decision Non-respondent Performance on this measure Same % ACL Performance Target 90% Met/Not

Proposed Update Overall Satisfaction Measure Maintain current activity satisfaction calculations Add new overall calculation and ACL targets Sum of all four state level activity satisfaction tables 95% Target for sum of highly satisfied + satisfied 90% Target for overall response rate Customer Rating Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met Highly satisfied and satisfied System-generated 95% Response rate 90%

State Plan Update Last complete State Plan for AT was FY 2015-17 Original version posted on CATADA with grantee profile Updates formally done for FY16 and 17, informally since Program participation page kept current on CATADA Last approved State Plan serves as approved application until replaced New State Plan form approved for FY 2018-20 ACL developing online collection tool Current status

Data Trends – Use Your Data Volume Output FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 Device Demonstrations 44,439 40,934 39,916 43,771 47,923 49,056 38,709 Short-term Device Loans 35,459 34,224 35,243 36,432 39,970 37,239 32,353 Reuse Recipients 41,230 38,258 43,713 50,706 63,249 57,782 59,149 State Financing Recipients 4,039 6,301 6,372 4,850 5,849 7,303 6,457 Training Participants 116,211 121,505 118,244 120,483 117,220 125,783 107,658 Add prior year above data to APR and ask for explanation of change? Actual variance – what is cause? Reflection of data fidelity issues/corrections? Reflection of data system integrity issues?

Next Steps Share feedback on proposed APR changes Watch for State Plan updates Participate in Using Your Data session and understand your data changes. CATADA – Diane Golden diane.golden@ataporg.org ACL – Rob Groenendaal Robert.Groenendaal@acl.hhs.gov