Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Biology of Amyloid: Structure, Function, and Regulation
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber 
Identification of Structural Mechanisms of HIV-1 Protease Specificity Using Computational Peptide Docking: Implications for Drug Resistance  Sidhartha.
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway  Jane Clarke, Ernesto Cota, Susan B Fowler,
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
From Computer Simulations to Human Disease
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Conservation of Protein Structure over Four Billion Years
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Recognizing Protein Substructure Similarity Using Segmental Threading
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Aude Echalier, Celia F. Goodhew, Graham W. Pettigrew, Vilmos Fülöp 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
Alice Qinhua Zhou, Diego Caballero, Corey S. O’Hern, Lynne Regan 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Julian Gough, Cyrus Chothia  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Toward a Structural Understanding of Arf Family:Effector Specificity
Sequence-Specific RNA Binding by a Nova KH Domain
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
An Efficient Null Model for Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 1401-1410 (September 2006) Correlation between Protein Stability Cores and Protein Folding Kinetics: A Case Study on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Apo-Azurin  Mingzhi Chen, Corey J. Wilson, Yinghao Wu, Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede, Jianpeng Ma  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 1401-1410 (September 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of Azurin (Left) Three-dimensional illustration showing the structure of P. aeruginosa azurin (PDB code: 1azu). Trp48, with a unique fluorescence that reports on an intact core, is shown in green; the copper is shown in blue space filling, and its ligands are shown in stick representation. (Right) Two-dimensional view of azurin's secondary structure elements. The β strands are represented by arrows, and the helix is represented by an elongated box. The two sheets forming the sandwich are indicated. The numbering of the strands is the same as in Tables 1 and 2 and the text. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Three-Dimensional Illustration of P. aeruginosa Azurin with Residues for which ϕ Values Have Been Derived in Stick Representations The probed side chains are color coded as follows: ϕ = 0–0.29, yellow; ϕ = 0.3–0.79, red; ϕ = 0.8–1.0, purple. The four strands constituting the highest-ranking substructure in our computation (i.e., strands 3, 4, 6, and 7; Table 2) are highlighted in blue. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of TNfnIII Three-dimensional illustration showing the three-dimensional structure of TNfnIII (PDB code: 1ten); the 4 residues for which high ϕ values have been reported (Hamill et al., 2000) are shown in red stick representations. The four strands constituting the highest-ranking substructure in our computation (i.e., strands 2, 3, 5, and 6; Table 3) are highlighted in blue. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Distributions of Computational Scores (A and B) Plots of total score distributions in the computations for (A) azurin and (B) TNfnIII. The x axis corresponds to the sorted indices of all combinations of four secondary structure elements; the y axis indicates the total score of each combination. Additional energetic details for the ten lowest-scoring combinations are listed in Tables 2 and 3. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Schematic Description of Hydrogen Bonding Interactions Used in Constructing the Statistical Energy Function Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic Description of the Procedure Used for Computing the Solvent-Accessible Surface In this figure, atom j casts some burial area on atom i (the shaded region), while atom j′ does not. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Energy of Residue Solvation Two examples (i.e., Leu and Lys) of the energy terms associated with the solvent-accessible area. The minimum of Leu appears at a smaller ratio of solvent-accessible surface, which indicates that this hydrophobic residue has a higher probability of being buried than the hydrophilic residue Lys. Structure 2006 14, 1401-1410DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.07.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions