Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Constitutive Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Kinase Is Involved in the Myofibroblast Differentiation of Scleroderma Fibroblasts  Yoshihiro Mimura, Hironobu.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
F11L-Mediated Inhibition of RhoA-mDia Signaling Stimulates Microtubule Dynamics during Vaccinia Virus Infection  Yoshiki Arakawa, João V. Cordeiro, Michael.
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Nicole Tegtmeyer, Steffen Backert  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Rui Pedro Galão, Suzanne Pickering, Rachel Curnock, Stuart J.D. Neil 
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Arachidonic acid induces ERK activation via Src SH2 domain association with the epidermal growth factor receptor  L.D. Alexander, Y. Ding, S. Alagarsamy,
Integrin α3β1-Dependent Activation of FAK/Src Regulates Rac1-Mediated Keratinocyte Polarization on Laminin-5  David P. Choma, Vincenzo Milano, Kevin M.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
TNF-Induced Activation of the Nox1 NADPH Oxidase and Its Role in the Induction of Necrotic Cell Death  You-Sun Kim, Michael J. Morgan, Swati Choksi, Zheng-gang.
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Yiuka Leung, Shabeen Ally, Marcia B. Goldberg  Cell Host & Microbe 
F11L-Mediated Inhibition of RhoA-mDia Signaling Stimulates Microtubule Dynamics during Vaccinia Virus Infection  Yoshiki Arakawa, João V. Cordeiro, Michael.
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Masako Tamada, Dene L. Farrell, Jennifer A. Zallen  Developmental Cell 
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Coxsackievirus Entry across Epithelial Tight Junctions Requires Occludin and the Small GTPases Rab34 and Rab5  Carolyn B. Coyne, Le Shen, Jerrold R. Turner,
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Stimulates Activator Protein 1 DNA-Binding Activity by a Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Ras/MEK/Extracellular Signal Regulated.
Livio Trusolino, Andrea Bertotti, Paolo M Comoglio  Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Changes in integrin expression during adipocyte differentiation
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
A Novel Role for FAK as a Protease-Targeting Adaptor Protein
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 520-531 (June 2011) Serine Phosphorylation of Cortactin Controls Focal Adhesion Kinase Activity and Cell Scattering Induced by Helicobacter pylori  Nicole Tegtmeyer, Ruth Wittelsberger, Roland Hartig, Silja Wessler, Narcisa Martinez-Quiles, Steffen Backert  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 520-531 (June 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Role of Cortactin in the Formation of the Hp-Induced Elongation Phenotype of AGS Cells AGS cells were transfected with cortactin siRNA or with a control siRNA and then infected with the Hp strain P1 for 6 hr. (A) Cortactin expression was examined by western blot analysis. The α-GAPDH blot served as loading control. (B) Quantification of cortactin expression and number of elongated AGS cells. Error bars represent ± standard deviation (SD). (C) Phase-contrast microscopy shows that the Hp-induced phenotype is downregulated by cortactin siRNA. See also Figure S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cortactin Becomes Phosphorylated on Serine Residues S-113, S-405, and S-418 during Hp Infection (A) Schematic presentation of the 80 kDa cortactin molecule. The serine phosphorylation sites are highlighted on the left. (B) AGS cells were infected for 6 hr with Hp WT or ΔcagA mutant. Infected and control cells were separated into membrane and cytoplasmic fractions. The α-cortactin and α-integrin-β1 blots served as loading controls. (C) Cortactin phosphorylation at the known serine residues S-113, S-405, and S-418 was analyzed with the indicated phosphoserine-specific antibodies. Densitometric quantification of band intensities is also shown. Error bars represent ± SD. (D) Cortactin tyrosine phosphorylation was analyzed using an α-pan-phosphotyrosine antibody. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cortactin Forms a Complex with FAK but Not with N-WASP or Actin during Hp Infection (A) AGS cells were infected for 6 hr with Hp WT or ΔcagA mutant, followed by an IP with an α-cortactin antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with the indicated antibodies for N-WASP and actin. (C) Immunofluorescence analysis of noninfected or infected AGS cells (6 hr). Cells were fixed and costained with α-cortactin (red) and α-FAK (green) antibodies. In noninfected cells, cortactin is mainly located in the cytoplasm (arrowheads), while FAK is located in focal adhesion contacts. In Hp-infected cells, cortactin also colocalizes with FAK at the tips of the elongated cells (arrows). Quantification of the signals show that about 5% of total cortactin and 3% of total FAK colocalize in infected cells. (D) AGS cells were transfected with indicated GFP-cortactin constructs (48 hr). Cells were then infected with Hp WT for 6 hr or left untreated, followed by an IP with an α-GFP antibody. The α-FAK blot shows that FAK is in complex with cortactin during Hp infection. This complex is not detectable with the GFP-cortactinΔSH3 mutant or in non-infected cells. (B and E) Quantitation of band intensities was performed with the Lumi-Imager F1. Error bars represent ± SD. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cortactin Interacts with FAK In Vitro, and Phosphorylation of Cortactin at S-405 or S-418 Is Essential for the Binding of FAK in Cells (A) In vitro phosphorylation of GST-cortactin with ERK, followed by incubation with FAK and GST pulldown. (B) AGS cells were cotransfected for 48 hr with indicated GFP-cortactin constructs and HA-FAK WT, followed by IP with an α-HA antibody. The IPs were probed with α-HA to ensure equal amounts of HA-FAK input. Western blot analysis with α-GFP demonstrates that GFP-cortactin S405D and S418D bind to HA-FAK WT. (C) Band intensities were quantified with the Lumi-Imager F1. Error bars represent ± SD. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Binding of Cortactin Requires a Proline-rich Region in FAK and Is Associated with Increased FAK Kinase Activity (A) Schematic presentation of the domain structure of FAK and its proline-rich regions, PR1 and PR2 (gray). Two other PxxP motifs were discovered and named PR3 and PR4 (black). The indicated prolines were substituted by alanines. (B) AGS cells were transfected with the indicated HA-FAK constructs. After 48 hr, cells were infected with Hp WT for 6 hr followed by an α-HA IP. The input amount of the HA-FAK constructs is shown. The α-cortactin blot shows that the ΔPR3 mutant barely binds cortactin, suggesting that PR3 region is important for the interaction with cortactin. (C) The activity of FAK kinase was analyzed using the α-phospho-FAK (Y-397) antibody. The results show that HA-FAKΔPR1 and HA-FAKΔPR2 are highly activated during infection, while weak kinase activity was detectable with the other FAK constructs. (D) Densitometric measurement of band intensities revealed the percentage of FAK activity and the relative amount of bound cortactin per input amount of HA-FAK. Error bars represent ± SD. See also Figure S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Importance of FAK Activation and Complex Formation with Cortactin during Hp Infection (A) AGS cells were infected for 6 hr with Hp WT or ΔcagA mutant, followed by an α-cortactin IP. The IPs were probed with the indicated antibodies. (B) AGS cells were infected with Hp WT in the presence/absence of 10 μM FAK inhibitor PF-573228. The α-FAK blot confirms equal amounts of protein in each lane. FAK activity was examined by using α-phospho-FAK (Y-397) antibody. (C) Quantitation of elongation phenotype and percentage of FAK activity as reavealed by densitometric measurement of band intensities. Error bars represent ± SD. (D) Microscopic analysis shows that treatment of cells with PF-573228 blocked the elongation phenoytpe. See also Figure S5. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Role of Cortactin Phosphorylation in Interaction with FAK during Hp Infection (A) Schematic presentation of the domain structure of cortactin with the known ERK1/2, PAK1, and Src phosphorylation sites. Phosphorylation may cause a switch in cortactin and makes the SH3 domain accessible for protein/protein interactions. (B) Phosphorylation-dependent binding of FAK is shown. (C) During the course of Hp infection two independent signaling pathways are activated leading to the (1) tyrosine dephosphorylation and (2) serine phosphorylation of cortactin as indicated. Cortactin phosphorylated at S-405, but not S-113 or S-418, plays a central role for the interaction with FAK at PR3. The interaction of cortactin with FAK induces the phosphorylation at Y-397 and other sites resulting in significantly increased kinase activity of FAK. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 520-531DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.007) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions