Public Engagement & Constituent Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. The Department of Medicine Strategic Plan  Our roadmap for the future  It will shape and guide what the Department of.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
From Kathy's blog 10/1/08: Give people a break. The break you probably deserve yourself. People are out to do good, 99% of the time. You probably are too.
U.S. General Services Administration USA.gov Contact Center Case Study: JD Power Assessment & Customer Satisfaction Results Mary Ann Monroe Director, Contact.
Nadine Drew Lynn Goldman Merrie Meyers Charles Webster.
CRVA Strategic Plan Fiscal February 2, 2011.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
Long Range Strategic Plan Advocacy Maintain & enhance tax benefits for all ESOPs Maintain & enhance tax benefits for all ESOPs Maintain & enhance bipartisan.
State Presentation:VIRGINIA October 14,  Separations (SEPs): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Communication Deficiencies / Internal and.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Ohio Housing Finance Agency – Strategic Priority Culture Initiative Ohio Housing Finance Agency Strategic Priority Culture Initiative.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Organizational Communications and Its Importance to Company Growth. Presented by: Kenneth Martinez Organizational Communications Manager.
Srija Srinivasan, Director of Health Policy and Planning Scott Morrow, MD, MPH, Health Officer San Mateo County Health Department November, 2007 Turning.
Multi-Cultural Committee Update The Message of Diversity & Inclusion Lana Fountain Flakes Director of Membership Initiatives.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
Coraggio Group | coraggiogroup.com Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Planning October 12, 2016.
PARTNERSHIP COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations
Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Direction 2017/ /20
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
Challenges and opportunities for the CFO
Welcome! Enhancing the Care Team May 25, 2017
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) Session # 21
IB Business Management
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
University Career Services Committee
Rethinking Central Office Supports to Schools
Best Practices Consortium
HUB Program Update FY Strategy
ROTARY STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE
The Women’s Council of REALTORS® Chapter-to-Network Project
Driving Colorado Forward Together
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
KEYNOTE STAGE SPONSOR.
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
TSMO Program Plan Development
Strategic Planning: Intentional Stakeholder Engagement Strategies
Research Program Strategic Plan
Vision Facilitation Template
How do we make Brand Tracking more actionable? OSG has the answers!
Docks & Harbors Staff Strategic Planning Overview
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Roadmap to an Organizational Culture of QI
Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING. Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING.
Utilizing Internal Audit Metrics to Advance Your Department
STRATEGIC PLAN
Strategy Implementation: Internal Control and Performance
Public engagement strategy
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Strategic alternative choice
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Public Engagement Risk
Connecting Customer & Employee Survey Results to District-wide Engagement Plans Discussing Public Engagement Meeting|February 7, 2019 Kayla Dean, Market.
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMING FEDERAL WORKFORCE THROUGH INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION Randy Bergquist Chair, Interagency Chief Learning Officer Council.
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
Projecting the identity of the SSC and Branding Justin Borradaile
Review of Progress in Year 1 Looking to Year 2
DREMC Balanced Scorecard Training / Planning Workshop
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Optimization
Understanding Motivation
MnDOT Public Engagement Awards
The Balance scorecard Measures that drive performance
Pulse Survey Follow up 2019.
Integrating Key Business Metrics
CREATING A STRATEGY FOCUSED ORGANIZATION
Presentation transcript:

Public Engagement & Constituent Services 2019 PECS Annual Plan Public Engagement & Constituent Services February 7, 2019

Annual Planning Process 2018 Year in Review Highlights from prior year including successes and struggles. A fair and balanced representation of the past 12 months.  Current situation What is the state of things today? What factors are impacting your work now and into the year ahead? Macro-level considerations such as leadership changes, the Strategic Operation Plan and business environment Key Issues Focus areas of time, energy and resources that should deliver most bang for the buck What needs to be addressed sooner rather than later in order to move the needle. Objectives/Strategies/Goals for 2019 Directly related to key issues Some KPI (key performance indicator) or measure of success included 4/19/2019

Driving Forces Segmentation Documentation Standardization Innovation Who is our customer? Documentation What needs to be captured and retained due to impending staff turnover and for sharing with key audiences? Standardization Where can we find commonality and consistency in timing, approach, methodology across MnDOT? Innovation How can improve upon the way we do things to move the unit, office and/or organization forward? Education Why are we focusing on this and why should it matter to you? 4/19/2019

2018 Year In Review WIG 2.0 initiated improvements integrated into the “whirlwind” as agency shifts toward implementing a customer-centered mindset via strategic data collection Re-set standards for responsiveness and accuracy of information Agency wide visibility to how engagement can influence perception Public engagement fully integrated into agency Unified D&I plan as well as Strategic Operating Plan Customer Trust workgroup and KPIs dedicated to ongoing measurement Progress reports and accountability up to Commissioner, Governor’s office and internal leadership on goals District-first operating and staffing model implemented to support “Engagement is local” vision Greater MN districts now have engagement staff in place to complement PACs Training opportunities provided to share what’s working and what we can do better/differently moving forward IAP2 (traditional and customized); FHWA Peer Exchange; Monthly meetings; Website updates Standardized processes and metrics Recording and reporting of customer issues (2018 State Government Innovation Award) Monthly Scoreboard enhancements: added metrics for timeliness, accuracy, satisfaction, and follow up requests Net Promoter Score IAP2 Spectrum and nomenclature

Current Situation New Governor, Commissioner and Chief of Staff with more focus on marketing MnDOT Increased agency visibility and scrutiny in conjunction with gas tax debate SOP retains customer trust as an ongoing key goal at MnDOT Desire to retain district autonomy vs. some standardization Customer feedback, insights and perceptions are more in-demand As engagement focus increases, so does need to educate and train broader range of staff

2019 Key Issues Marketing MnDOT Training and education internally Telling our story and how/why people should support gas tax externally Manage relationships locally Research support for the brand, operations, programs and agency services Establish and maintain a culture of accountability and performance measures

2019 Objectives/Strategies Marketing MnDOT PE version of Tribal Relations training and IAP2/ PE policy updates integrated into New Employee orientation STEM, Two Way STREETS, Artist in Residence District engagement plans FY20-21 Business Planning at office/district levels Research support for the brand, operations, programs and agency services “Real-time” polling data Project-related surveys for all levels, not just major projects Establish and maintain a culture of accountability and performance measures Monthly scorecards posted online (iHub) and downloaded for SLT/DEs Performance measures website with Omnibus data and selected data points for public consumption Case studies and knowledge sharing of what’s working

Thank you! Richard D. Davis Richard.D.Davis@state.mn.us 651-366-3052