The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Hart. Interagency Coordination and Management of Supports College/Career Connection Debra Hart University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers - Dr. Dwight C. Watson - University of Northern.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Best Practices in Action in Special Education Kim Sweet, Advocates for Children of New York On the Same Page Summit September 2011.
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
Measurement: Regional PDS Network Assessment System 1 Carol Wood, PhD, Star Weaver, PhD & Stacie Siers, MEd.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
How Do We Make Adolescent Inclusion Work? What are the values, skills, and knowledge necessary for success in inclusive adolescent settings? Peter L. Kozik.
Policymakers/The Field of Education focused on educators ability to impact P12 student learning All program areas are tasked with providing evidence our.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Recent Graduate Interviews: Preliminary Feedback on Teacher Preparation Programs What’s Works/Best Practices Hayley M Cavino, Evaluation Coordinator Office.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
IMPROVING THE ROLE OF GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS TO PARTICIPATE MEANINGFULLY IN INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS Tanya Gonzales, M.Ed. SWTLC, April 2014.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Teaching and Learning with Technology
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Partnership for Practice
Inclusion of Exceptional Learners
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Competency Assessment
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Maria Aguirre, Ph.D. Milagros Bravo, Ph.D. AlACiMa
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling

World Café Questions: In what ways can we successfully capitalize on and or promote the commitment to inclusive education at our institutions? In what ways can we help ensure that the needs of all learners are addressed as we prepare teachers? In what ways can we help ensure that the needs of all learners are addressed in (through) the quality (children) of field placements for our pre-service teachers? What success have you experienced in the schools with whom you partner in ensuring that the needs of all learners are addressed? What success have you experienced in your student field placements in ensuring that the needs of all learners are addressed? What success have you experienced at your institution with regard to the promotion, teaching, and learning of inclusive practice? How can the TF affect the accreditation process to strengthen the teachers of inclusion at institutions of higher education? What questions should be asking about helping to ensure that all children learn well from the teachers we prepare?

How do we run the place? What do we teach? How do we teach it?

How do we run the place? How do we run the place? Inclusion in the mission Inclusion in the mission Modeling inclusion with students with needs on campus Modeling inclusion with students with needs on campus Professional teaching standards in place: ability to teach all learners Professional teaching standards in place: ability to teach all learners Identify/collaborate with effective inclusive ed faculty/teachers Identify/collaborate with effective inclusive ed faculty/teachers Administrative support for inclusion Administrative support for inclusion Strong, viable partnerships Strong, viable partnerships Combine/integrate disciplines Combine/integrate disciplines Collaboration/co-teaching Collaboration/co-teaching Incorporate cooperating teachers in programs Incorporate cooperating teachers in programs

What do we teach? What do we teach? o Begin with severe disabilities o Collaboration o Thinking and problem solving o Review and participate with actual IEPs o Case studies o Schools-A-Tune o Content standards o Planning for Differentiated Instruction

How do we teach it? How do we teach it? Ensure rich field experiences Ensure rich field experiencesinclusive match with good, honest mentors observe through video connect/involve cooperating teachers action research Monitor and assess outcomes Monitor and assess outcomes research based strategies measure the impact on K-12 learners demonstrated effectiveness in first years of in-service teaching

How do we teach it? How do we teach it? Working together as professionals Working together as professionals Collaborating with parents and families Collaborating with parents and families Demand differentiated lesson plans Demand differentiated lesson plans Encourage self-advocacy Encourage self-advocacy PBIS PBIS

What questions should be asking about helping to ensure that all children learn well from the teachers we prepare? Who is doing the evaluating? What do we expect in the field to demonstrate competency? How well are candidates prepared in content standards? Why do we still utilize the categorical perspective for SWD? Are we collecting meaningful data or doing what accreditation tells us to do? How are we helping schools to focus on inclusion?

Recommendations Make inclusion a requirement of the accreditation diversity standard. Make inclusion a requirement of the accreditation diversity standard. Compare and contrast indicators of inclusion across NCATE, TEAC, Middle States, NYSED. Compare and contrast indicators of inclusion across NCATE, TEAC, Middle States, NYSED. Measure growth, measure outcomes, measure competencies, measure content standards, measure first years out. Measure growth, measure outcomes, measure competencies, measure content standards, measure first years out. Demand differentiated instruction, written and practiced. Demand differentiated instruction, written and practiced. Find/build/ensure inclusive field experiences, involve cooperating teachers more completely. Find/build/ensure inclusive field experiences, involve cooperating teachers more completely. Reflect actual circumstances in curricula. Reflect actual circumstances in curricula.