Sexual selection Current Biology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolutionary Genetics: You Are What You Evolve to Eat
Advertisements

Sperm Competition: Discrimination Isn't Always Bad
Niche construction drives social dependence in hermit crabs
Biological Optics: Deep Reflections
Wilhelm Hofmeister and the foundations of plant science
Sexual Selection II The use of models.
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages R673-R676 (August 2013)
Intralocus Sexual Conflict Unresolved by Sex-Limited Trait Expression
Wilhelm Hofmeister and the foundations of plant science
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Sexual Selection: The Importance of Long-Term Fitness Measures
Animal Vision: Rats Watch the Sky
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Episodic Memory: Rats Master Multiple Memories
Comparative Cognition: Action Imitation Using Episodic Memory
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Bats eavesdrop on the sound of copulating flies
Morphogens: Precise Outputs from a Variable Gradient
Evolutionary Genetics: A Piggyback Ride to Adaptation and Diversity
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages R504-R505 (June 2008)
Restoring sight in blind cavefish
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Evolutionary Genetics: Reuse, Recycle, Converge
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Sexual selection in plants
The human circadian clock entrains to sun time
Elephant cognition Current Biology
Fiddler crabs Current Biology
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages R60-R61 (January 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Sex ratios and social evolution
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Taste: Unraveling Tomato Flavor
Neurogenetics: Short-Circuiting Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors
Elementary motion detectors
Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences
Climate Change: A Hybrid Zone Moves North
It’s all about the constraints
Scale insects Current Biology
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages R188-R189 (March 2015)
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages R5-R8 (January 2013)
Evolution: Convergence in Dinosaur Crests
Group Behaviour: Leadership by Those in Need
Visual aftereffects Current Biology
Evolution: Lending a Helping Hand in Sperm Competition?
Protein Dynamics: Moore's Law in Molecular Biology
Burying beetles Current Biology
Insect Vision: Judging Distance with Binocular Motion Disparities
Richard A. Peters, Jan M. Hemmi, Jochen Zeil  Current Biology 
Dermatophytes Current Biology
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Stalk-eyed flies Current Biology
Murmurations Current Biology
Basal bodies Current Biology
Animal navigation: Birds as geometers?
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
The mushroom body Current Biology
Mates with Benefits: When and How Sexual Cannibalism Is Adaptive
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Genital Evolution: The Traumas of Sex
Presentation transcript:

Sexual selection Current Biology David J. Hosken, Clarissa M. House  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages R62-R65 (January 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Examples of conspicuous sexually selected characters. These can be display traits used to attract females and/or weapons used in male–male combat. Shown here (clockwise from top left) are: the plumage of a male sunbird; the exaggerated sword of a male sword-tailed fish; the horns of a male chameleon; and the enlarged eye-stalks of a male stalk-eyed fly. Images courtesy of Mhairi McFarlane, Nick Royle, Jan Stipala and Sam Cotton, respectively. Current Biology 2011 21, R62-R65DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A diagram illustrating Lande's model of the Fisher process. Male trait size (the red tail of the cartoon bird) is plotted on the x-axis and female preference for the male tail is on the y-axis. The dotted line (labelled Θ) represents the naturally selected optimal tail size, and female preference tends to move the tail beyond this size. The solid black line (the line of neutral equilibria) represents a balance between natural and sexual selection, and when these two are equal, there is no net selection on tail size. The slope of this line depends on the strength of natural and sexual selection on tail size. If, for example, female preference is strong and stereotyped and natural selection against exaggerated tail size is weak, the slope will be relatively shallow. The red dotted lines (lines of motion) represent the evolutionary trajectories of a population, with the precise trajectory followed being determined by the population's starting point. The slope of the lines of motion is determined by the genetic correlation between male trait and female preference. Shown here is the case when the genetic covariance is relatively strong — the lines of motion have a relatively steep slope — and the line of equilibrium has a relatively shallow slope. This corresponds to Fisher's runaway, where populations evolve away from the line of equilibria. Note that above the line of equilibria, larger tails evolve and below it, smaller tails. Redrawn from Arnold (1983) in Bateson, P. (ed) Mate Choice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). Current Biology 2011 21, R62-R65DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions