GoFormz A RISK BASED INSPECTION APPROACH A NEW INSPECTION PROCESS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Eugene Certification Project Case Study. Why Did Eugene Get Certified? Can’t do fund exchange ODOT's Local Agency Program More project control.
Advertisements

SITEMANAGER Frances J. Hood, P.E. Design/Materials/Construction Engineer Idaho Transportation Department.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
HACCP Manager Software™
Welcome to RAI, the future of collaborative Project Risk Management Overview of Project Risk and Issue Management RAI for the Project Manager RAI for the.
Civil Rights & Labor SiteManager Tina Collins - CRL Janet Treadway - SM.
PERSONAL CARE AND NURSING SERVICES PROVIDER MEETINGS 2014.
Chief Operating Officer Greg Johnson. 7 Million Sheets of Paper.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.
1 RMS Training Sponsored by the RMS Center July 2006.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Overview of the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule Module 1.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
ODOT’s Local Agency Certification Program Jill Pearson Certification Program Manager March 12, 2010.
UNIT II RCM PROCESS Module 2 PLANNING AND PREPARATION " Copyright 2002, Information Spectrum, Inc. All Rights Reserved."
1 RMS Training Sponsored by the RMS Center May 2010.
Develop Project Charter
Configuration Management and Change Control Change is inevitable! So it has to be planned for and managed.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Digital recordkeeping strategy for mobile work processes Joel Smith HPRM System Administrator.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
Chapter 9 The People in Information Systems. Learning Objectives Upon successful completion of this chapter, you will be able to: Describe each of the.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
California Health and Human Services Agency - Office of Systems Integration (OSI) PMO Forum November 19,
QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 3. Definitions Quality Assurance - A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes of doing right.
Create a system that reflects higher education best practices
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Moveware Client Wiki.
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Contract Administration Section
Implementation Strategy July 2002
SmartLaborII Supplier Training Overview October, 2016.
Sponsored by the RMS Center
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
Civil Rights & Labor SiteManager
Supplier Training Overview February 2018
Emphasis on Quality Rochester’s City Owner Contract Process
CMGT 445 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CMGT 445 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Federal Acquisition Service
Mobile Apps How to get more out of your workforce and save time money and resources.
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix
Project Charter General Information Project Title Date
Installation Restoration (IR) Collaboration Gateway
Salesforce – A new way forward
New Mexico Department of Health Immunization Program
Chapter 1 (pages 4-9); Overview of SDLC
Construction and Materials Management System
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Standard Design Process (SDP) Software Tom Czerniewski Entergy Nuclear
2018 National RAC and TRB State Representatives Meeting
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
NWT Asset Management Strategy & Implementation
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
Learning Management System (LMS) Alignment Meeting April 02, 2019
Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress
Salesforce – A new way forward
Technology Department Annual Update
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
Project Certification Planning Phase August 27, 2014
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Project.
Presentation transcript:

GoFormz A RISK BASED INSPECTION APPROACH A NEW INSPECTION PROCESS Andrew Opsitnik, P.E. Project Engineer ODOT District 6

OVERVIEW Need to document the inspection activities for quality FHWA Requirements Need to document the inspection activities for quality of workmanship Risk Based Inspection prioritization Streamlined and standardized data gathering Computer based document storage

Changes to the Manual of Procedures New process outlined in the 2017 MOP Inspection and Documentation activities have been prioritized! Engineering and Inspection staff will provide documentation for: Quantity for Payment Quality of Materials Quality of Construction

Prioritization of Inspection Activities Level 1 – Full time inspection RISK BASED PRIORITIES Prioritization of Inspection Activities Level 1 – Full time inspection Structure Concrete, piling Level 2 – Intermittent inspection Guardrail, 611 items, majority of our items Level 3 – End product Inspection Removals, mobilization, incidentals Level 1 – Full time inspection. Inspection performed continuously while the item is actively under construction. This level of inspection is required for items where the consequence of failure could result in a catastrophic, life-threatening safety hazard. Level 2 – Intermittent inspection. Inspection performed on an as needed basis, normally once per day, but focusing on initial setups and critical attributes when the item is actively under construction. This level of inspection is specified for items where the consequence of failure would directly affect environmental compliance, or where repair would delay the project or cause safety considerations. This priority level also includes items that require multi-activity construction processes. Inspection may occur as interim activities in the construction process are completed and before being covered or hidden by subsequent operations.. Level 3 – End product Inspection. Does not require inspection and construction quality documentation while the item is actively under construction, but inspection must be completed before the project is accepted. This level of inspection is specified for items where the consequence of failure is considered minimal in terms of Project performance. Generally, inspection may be completed by observation of the end product.

Prioritization of Documentation Requirements 1 - Minimum once per day RISK BASED PRIORITIES Prioritization of Documentation Requirements 1 - Minimum once per day 2 - Minimum once per Item 3 - Minimum once per group of similar items REMEMBER: Level 1 – Minimum once per day. Construction quality documentation frequency is typically required on a daily basis during active work specific to the item. Level 2 – Minimum once per Item. Construction quality documentation frequency is required at major intervals in the construction process of the item (e.g. prior to being covered or hidden by subsequent work) and shall not occur less than once during the Project. Level 3 – Minimum once per group of similar items. Construction quality documentation is required once per Project for all similar items (e.g., all shrubs, all traffic symbols…)

RISK BASED PRIORITIES. Inspection Priority and Form Selection List / RISK BASED PRIORITIES Inspection Priority and Form Selection List / Project Specific Priority List http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/Admin/Pages/InspectionForms.aspx

HISTORY OF NEW PROCESS - 2017 Pilot began July 2017 2 Pilot projects per District All forms were completed All Personnel had some type of Portable Electronic Device (Android tablet, iPad, iPhone, HP x360 2 in 1)

2018 – GoFormz went live Statewide January 1, 2018 – all projects sold on or after this date are using GoFormz Uniformity across all districts – Engineers and inspectors all use same forms All Districts have been trained Bi-weekly Risk Based Inspection/GoFormz teleconferences during the season Central Office Construction Administration Leadership AASHTOWare Project SiteManager e-Construction Group The Construction Administration Specialists District & Consultant call ins! Consultant training sessions

NEW PROCESS FLOWCHART Determine the Priority of Inspection and Documentation required for specific item of work Complete Quality and/or Quantity Forms All documentation will be stored to SharePoint as PDF If a non-conformance is noted - forms are automatically flagged in title on PDF Non-conformance tracker follows correction

Where do we go from here??

AASHTOWare Project C&M Implementation 2020

AWP is coming... ODOT is upgrading the construction administration software AASHTOWare Project SiteManager legacy system to the enterprise- wide web based solution of AASHTOWare Project - Construction & Materials module Early 2020 Since March of 2018 ODOT has been actively and aggressively working to upgrade to the AASHTOWare Project Construction & Materials system. This new application is web based so that all users will be able to access any where. We will be deploying the new system in early 2020.

Intent ODOT is implementing AASHTOWare Project web based system as a replacement of the AASHTOWare Project SiteManager construction and materials management system from the ground up statewide. To streamline processes, provide a platform to collaborate with stakeholders, utilize a unified database for all AASHTOWare modules, gain efficiency, to stay current in technological advances, integrate materials and construction management systems, allow for continual, seamless, and transparent upgrades and enhancements, provide external access to the system, collaboratively and constructively assessing business processes and making updates to meet business needs with an implementation team structure that includes expertise for each functional area with subject matter experts throughout the state Our intent is to replace the current AASHTOWare Project SiteManager system with the web based AASHTOWare Project Construction & Materials system which we now call “AWP”. AWP will provide many new opportunities for all stakeholders working with us to administer our Construction projects. We will be able to stay current with versions and new technology. We will be able to integrate the Materials functionality into one system.

Improvements Single Sign On (SSO) for all (internal and external) users This will be for Construction & Materials and Civil Rights & Labor modules Inclusion of the current TE24 Virtual Warehouse and QPL external systems to the AASHTOWare Project - Construction & Materials module Improve experience, performance, and transparency There will be many benefits with our upgrade but some of the ones highlighted here will have the greatest statewide impact from the onset. SSO Inclusion of TE24 and QPL Experience Performance Transparency

Improvements Increased use of mobile applications Mobile Inspector Field Interviewer Mobile Materials Sampler Direct access for external stakeholders FHWA Contractors Producers/Suppliers Local Participating Agencies Our field staff will be able to stay mobile and effective even if they don’t have connectivity through mobile applications. Our External Stakeholders will be able to access information and reports directly upon demand. Contractors will be given access to enter their SubContracts directly into the system. Approve Change Orders and progressive Estimates. Enter Mix Design information and more. And that is just with the Construction and Materials side. Contractors will also be able to enter payroll and prompt payment information as well as other CRL requirements in the AWP system.

With this upgrade we will be in the unified database of the AASHTOWare Project Suite - so all information will “current” for any module no matter what task is performed. This will also be a large benefit to the contractors as they will have one system to input information, not many.

Implementation Schedule 9/2019 – 2/2020 Training Explain the schedule so far and our expectations moving forward.

Training - External Stakeholders Contractors, Consultants, and Producers & Suppliers will receive training Fall 2019 Contractors will be able to select modules that their personnel will need to be trained Construction & Materials Civil Rights & Labor BOTH We will be working with contracting community to set up locations and dates Continue explanation and lay out desired attendance and requests

Training It is our intent to train our external stakeholders first and then our internal staff There will be several opportunities to take the training(s) We will conduct in-person training, as well as, links to videos and guides afterwards Continue explanation and lay out desired attendance and requests

Questions? Continue explanation and lay out desired attendance and requests