At Birth, Humans Associate “Few” with Left and “Many” with Right

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

A Gαq-Ca2+ Signaling Pathway Promotes Actin-Mediated Epidermal Wound Closure in C. elegans Suhong Xu, Andrew D. Chisholm Current Biology Volume 21, Issue.
Ancient Endo-siRNA Pathways Reveal New Tricks Julie M. Claycomb Current Biology Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages R703-R715 (August 2014) DOI: /j.cub
The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
The Origins and Evolution of Vertebrate Metamorphosis Vincent Laudet Current Biology Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages R726-R737 (September 2011) DOI: /j.cub
Calibrating color vision
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Brain Responses in 4-Month-Old Infants Are Already Language Specific
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009)
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Comparative Cognition: Action Imitation Using Episodic Memory
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Infant cognition Current Biology
Ryota Kanai, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Frans A.J. Verstraten  Current Biology 
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Joyce F. Benenson, Richard W. Wrangham  Current Biology 
Antarctic sea ice losses drive gains in benthic carbon drawdown
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Learning Biases Underlie “Universals” in Avian Vocal Sequencing
Brain Responses in 4-Month-Old Infants Are Already Language Specific
Old-Growth Fishes Become Scarce under Fishing
Quantity Cognition: Numbers, Numerosity, Zero and Mathematics
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Vocal Development: How Marmoset Infants Express Their Feelings
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Elementary motion detectors
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
Early Life: Embracing the RNA World
Motor Control: No Constant but Change
Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Neuroanatomy: Connectome Connects Fly and Mammalian Brain Networks
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Sputum culture conversion in new TB regimens
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Lysann Wagener, Maria Loconsole, Helen M. Ditz, Andreas Nieder 
David A. McVea, Keir G. Pearson  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages R350-R351 (April 2018)
Adaptive Diversity: Hormones and Metabolism in Freshwaters
Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf  Current Biology 
Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited
Circadian Biology: The Early Bird Catches the Morning Shift
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Presentation transcript:

At Birth, Humans Associate “Few” with Left and “Many” with Right Maria Dolores de Hevia, Ludovica Veggiotti, Arlette Streri, Cory D. Bonn  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages 3879-3884.e2 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.024 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Methods and Results of Exp. 1, Number, Duration, and Length Left: (A) Infants are familiarized with a long line and an 18-syllable sequence/long duration and then tested with a 6-syllable sequence/short duration paired with a short line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. (B) Infants are familiarized with a short line and a 6-syllable sequence/short duration and then tested with an 18-syllable sequence/long duration and a long line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. Right: data are represented as mean and bootstrapped 95% CI. Small dots represent individual data points. Average looking times (seconds) during test trials: infants look longer to the line presented on the left than to the one presented on the right when experiencing a decrease from familiarization (18-syllable sequence/long duration) to test (6-syllable sequence/short duration); conversely, infants look longer to the line presented on the right than to the one presented on the left when experiencing an increase from familiarization (6-syllable sequence/short duration) to test (18-syllable sequence/long duration). See also Table S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 3879-3884.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Methods and Results of Exp. 2, Duration and Length, and Exp. 3, Length Top, left: (A) Infants are familiarized with a long line and a long duration and then tested with a short duration paired with a short line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. (B) Infants are familiarized with a short line and a short duration and then tested with a long duration paired with a long line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. Bottom, left: (A) Infants are familiarized with a long line and then tested with a short line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. (B) Infants are familiarized with a short line and then tested with a long line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. Top and bottom, right: data are represented as mean and bootstrapped 95% CI. Small dots represent individual data points. Average looking times (seconds) during test trials: infants look equally long to both the left and right lines in test trials across all familiarization conditions. See also Tables S2 and S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 3879-3884.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Methods and Results of Exp. 4, Number and Length, and Exp. 5, Number and Duration Top, left: (A) Infants are familiarized with a long line and an 18-syllable sequence and then tested with a 6-syllable sequence paired with a short line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. (B) Infants are familiarized with a short line and a 6-syllable sequence and then tested with an 18-syllable sequence and a long line appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. Both numerical sequences are matched in duration. Bottom, left: (A) Infants are familiarized with a line and an 18-syllable sequence and then tested with a 6-syllable sequence paired with a circle appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. (B) Infants are familiarized with a line and a 6-syllable sequence and then tested with an 18-syllable sequence paired with a circle appearing on the left and right sides of the screen in consecutive test trials. Right: data are represented as mean and bootstrapped 95% CI. Small dots represent individual data points. Average looking times (seconds) during test trials: infants look longer to the figure presented on the left than to the one presented on the right when experiencing a decrease from familiarization (18-syllable sequence) to test (6-syllable sequence); conversely, infants look longer to the figure presented on the right than to the one presented on the left when experiencing an increase from familiarization (6-syllable sequence) to test (18-syllable sequence). See also Tables S4 and S5. Current Biology 2017 27, 3879-3884.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.024) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions